On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:12:22AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
[ ] yes to a
[ ] no to a [ ] yes to a AND b
[ ] yes to b === [ ] yes to b alone
[ ] no to b [ ] further discussion
[ ] further
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:37:58PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
That's not precisely what I recall us agreeing to. I recall us agreeing to a
ballot that, I suppose, could take a form like this:
[ ] YES to Foundational Documents amendment
[ ] NO to Foundational Documents amendment
[ ] YES
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
If my memory serves me correctly, Branden I decide that our
proposals should be on the same ballot; though there does remain some
difference in them. We think that there should be three options of
the ballot: (ordering of A and B was done by a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
If my memory serves me correctly, Branden I decide that our
proposals should be on the same ballot; though there does remain some
difference in them. We think that there should be three options of
the ballot: (ordering of A and B was done by a
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 01:50:49PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
If my memory serves me correctly, Branden I decide that our
proposals should be on the same ballot; though there does remain some
difference in them. We think that there should be three options of
the ballot:
5 matches
Mail list logo
