Bug#1059267: ITP: apt-verify - extend apt's gpgv-based verification mechanism

have actual users (I see e.g. apt-canary downloading files) that you can solve only by being a proper part of the acquire process, not by attaching yourself with duck tape and hot glue to its underbelly. Especially not if you want this to be a security feature… Best regards David Kalnischkie

Bug#1008644: ITP: nala -- commandline frontend for the apt package manager

from the apt team, I don't think we have the resources to help you with packaging through.) Best regards David Kalnischkies signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#964970: RFP: dotpagemod -- Firefox add-on to load local CSS and JavaScript from your dotfiles into websites

s upstream and/or sponsor (if needed) even. [Even if I am still not really believing there are other users…] Best regards David Kalnischkies ¹ sometimes, I get the impression that side-loading browser add-ons is on its way out upstream and hence heavily discouraged even here. signature.asc Descri

Bug#869654: ITP: no-resource-uri-leak -- browser extension for improving privacy by denying resource:// access to Web content.

ser context. Could it be that Firefox upstream itself or via Tor is working on fixing this at the root? Best regards David Kalnischkies signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#756022: ITP: apt-transport-s3 -- APT transport for privately held AWS S3 repositories

On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 12:44:16AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: * David Kalnischkies da...@kalnischkies.de, 2014-07-26, 15:25: You don't need to write your credentials in a sources.list anymore (which should be world-readable) if your apt is recent enough (and with recent I mean at least

Bug#756022: ITP: apt-transport-s3 -- APT transport for privately held AWS S3 repositories

and set for it the permissions to your liking!). Best regards David Kalnischkies signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#745259: ITP: apt-transport-tor -- APT transport for anonymous package downloads via Tor

support to the existing methods… Where does it lead us to, when DDs prefer to do forks of Debian native packages? I am bit scared of the answer… (it explains though why my apt3 in brainfuck is going nowhere. ;) ) Best regards David Kalnischkies ¹ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 37 deletions

Bug#703366: RFH: apt-file -- search for files within Debian packages (command-line interface)

and OptionalIndexTargets the later aren't really optional (but hardcoded-optional as we couldn't break ABI at that point), fixing this now would be good [aka: needed]. So long, Best regards David Kalnischkies -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#652891: ITP: nerdtree -- Nerdtree is a vim plugin which gives a tree view of all the directories

not be a package of its own, but submitted as a patch to vim-scripts. There is already a bug+patch for it in the bts: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624661 So you might want to contact the author, update/check the patch and ping the maintainer(s) to get it included. Best regards David

Bug#592877: ITP: apt2 -- Advanced Package Tool 2

(cross post to merge the two independent threads http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/08/msg00338.html http://lists.debian.org/deity/2010/08/msg00097.html and to ensure everyone has the same information. In case you want to discuss the topic feel free to do it at deity@) We started this