Chow Loong Jin hyper...@debian.org writes:
In this case, we're talking about confusion between a package name + /usr/bin
binary and a file format. There isn't, to my knowledge, any other executable
in
PATH by the name of gpx, nor is there a package named gpx, so this is still
rather in the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:16:43PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote:
Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 01:48:36PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote:
If it's not too late, would it be possible to change the name of this
package? gpx is also the name of a common file format
Hi.
If it's not too late, would it be possible to change the name of this
package? gpx is also the name of a common file format used for GPS
tracks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_eXchange_Format
I think it may be confusing to have a gpx package that refers to
something completely different.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 01:48:36PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote:
Hi.
If it's not too late, would it be possible to change the name of this
package? gpx is also the name of a common file format used for GPS
tracks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_eXchange_Format
I think it may be confusing to
Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 01:48:36PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote:
If it's not too late, would it be possible to change the name of this
package? gpx is also the name of a common file format used for GPS
tracks:
5 matches
Mail list logo
