* Jon Dowland jon+debian-...@alcopop.org [2009-09-14 12:26:37 CEST]:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
I was trying to see where the current state of some
files were and noticed we have (at least) two version
control systems going on here.
Is now a good
* Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com [2009-09-14 22:05:06 CEST]:
On Mon,14.Sep.09, 11:26:37, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
I was trying to see where the current state of some
files were and noticed we have (at least) two version
On Wed,23.Sep.09, 13:22:18, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
That would be an extremely interesting approach, I though fear of some
limitations of po(4a) here with either getting huge chunks in the
message catalogue or losing the posibility to rearange parts of the text
or adding additional parts
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:05:06PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mon,14.Sep.09, 11:26:37, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
I was trying to see where the current state of some
files were and noticed we have (at least) two version
On Mon,14.Sep.09, 16:59:32, Craig Small wrote:
Hello,
I was trying to see where the current state of some files were and
noticed we have (at least) two version control systems going on here.
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/webwml/trunk/webwml/
and
http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/webwml/
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
I was trying to see where the current state of some
files were and noticed we have (at least) two version
control systems going on here.
Is now a good time to move to git? :-)
(sorry)
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:15:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mon,14.Sep.09, 16:59:32, Craig Small wrote:
Which one is the correct one to use? And if it is not cvs.d.o then
someone needs to update the documentation at
http://www.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs
CVS is correct.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:20:06PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
Aaargh - I just realized I have been happily making updates to the CD
vendor list in the _SVN_ repo in the last weeks!
Turned out to be just one commit of english/CD/vendors/vendors.CD, which
I manually inspected and moved over
Richard Atterer wrote:
Aaargh - I just realized I have been happily making updates to the CD
vendor list in the _SVN_ repo in the last weeks! I thought we'd switched
to SVN and never bothered to check whether my changes appeared on
www.d.o.
As (AFAIK) there is no active work being done on
On Mon,14.Sep.09, 11:26:37, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
I was trying to see where the current state of some
files were and noticed we have (at least) two version
control systems going on here.
Is now a good time to move to git?
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:15:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
There were experiments to switch to svn instead of cvs, probably that's
why you see newer files.
Ah ha, and of course the files I checked were Richard's, and they
happened to be just the ones that were in the wrong spot.
CVS is
11 matches
Mail list logo
