Bug#501954: use MediaWiki instead of MoinMoin

2008-10-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:05:57PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
 On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 05:50:29AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Package: wiki.debian.org
  Severity: wishlist
  
  I hereby propose wiki.debian.org be moved from MoinMoin to the popular
  MediaWiki software.
  
  I expect this proposal to sit here for several years slowly gaining
  supporters (so please don't just stamp it wontfix, etc.) By that time
  there will be even more programs available to do the conversion than now.
 
 There is a page on the Wiki where others (including me) already brought
 this up, please find it and link it (or maybe better to paste it).
 
 Mentioning only popular as the argument for MediaWiki does not do it
 justice, in fact maybe even the opposite...

In the interest of fairness, I looked it up myself, and found it pretty
quickly at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWebsiteDiscussion

Mediawiki?

I'm really ashamed to bring this up, but maybe Debian could consider
a change to MediaWiki? I guess I'll get flamed for this, but I
actually think it's a much nicer interface (eye candy and
usage-wise).

If you compare with e.g., the Gentoo wiki, the Gentoo wiki has a
much higher activity than the Debian wiki has, and I think the
userbase does not explain this (I'd expect Debian to be just as
large).

Very sorry to bring this up, be gentle with the flaming of me now!

Answer

wiki.debian.org is a 4 months old wiki started after the DSA
volunteered to host an official Debian wiki instead of having
Michael Ivey host wiki.debian.net using Kwiki. The switch to Moin
happened at the same time. When the wiki was still run with Kwiki, I
think I was the most insistent person to request a move to
MediaWiki. Kwiki is a really poor engine, so migrating to Moin
already improved things more than they would be improved now by
switching to MediaWiki. When the migration occured, Moin was in a
little bit better position to be used by DSA than MediaWiki, Moin
was in Debian since a long time while MediaWiki was only ITP-ed.
When the migration was complete though, MediaWiki was already in
Sid, so it must not have been a big factor for the DSA. My guess is
that the DSA chose Moin since it's in Python while MediaWiki is in
PHP (I don't see anything else explaining why an engine so clearly
inferior to MediaWiki in terms of usability would have been chosen).

If you still think that moving to MediaWiki is worth it and there is
a chance that DSA agrees and implements that, there are other pages
about migrating to MediaWiki (e.g. HelpMoveDebianWikiToMediaWiki or
DebianWiki/Engine) where this discussion should be more appropriate.
This page can probably be deleted.

small note to wikis

moinmoin seems currently (2007) the most feature rich and flexible
wiki technology available, and it will stay so for some time. its
biggest advantage is the graphical editor, but also its simpler wiki
syntax and theming make it much easier to use for a beginner. from
an administration point of view it is also much simpler. just try to
get personal moin run on your pc in 5 min and synchronize with a
real moin on the web which has wiki sync enabled. -- ThurnerRupert
2007-06-13 07:35:13

software

This Wiki software that we're using right now, and/or the way it is
set up, is just horribly unfriendly compared to MediaWiki. I admit I
could be biased, having made tens of thousands of edits on Wikipedia
under MediaWiki, but other than a gazillion functional user
interfaces fixes that it could greatly benefit from, it could also
benefit from mediawiki stuff such as namespaces, slashes in URLs, no
CamelCase (ugh), categorization that is distinct from the rest of
the pages, or Special:Whatlinkshere (list of links to the page), or
edit links on sections... heck, this discussion page as such seems
strange to me, with people using subsections for responses rather
than indentation... --Joy

I should also mention - this thing doesn't allow me to remember my
login credentials in the browser. While this could be considered a
security feature, and is probably possible to work around using
greasemonkey or whatever, it's also really annoying :) --Joy

Another thing is that we don't seem to have administrator users
here. I don't know if this is the fault of our current installation
(maybe we just don't have a way of listing them? :) or a generic
problem, but MediaWiki has that, and admins are able to ban spammers
etc. --Joy

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of 

Bug#501954: use MediaWiki instead of MoinMoin

2008-10-14 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Am Dienstag, den 14.10.2008, 09:20 +0800 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 OK, now I made http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/Engine and
 http://wiki.debian.org/HelpMoveDebianWikiToMediaWiki also link back to
 this bug so users can better find this proposal in the BTS rather than
 opening a new wishlist. The pros and cons are already mentioned on
 those web pages. Just let this bug be a longterm standing request to
 compliment those web pages. No action required for now. Thanks.

 Neither of the two pages do answer Josip's nor Franklin's question on
what's the rationale for the proposal. There is a short list of
advantages that MediaWiki would have over twiki in the Engine page, but
almost all of them are available through usage of Moin already, so I
like to follow Franklin's reason for closing this bug. The
HelpMoveToMediaWiki page also lists many people that would like to help
to move away from kwiki/twiki so I'm not sure wether they are still all
that eager since the switch to Moin.

 So, agreeing with Franklin here, if you aren't able to bring up a
rationale for why you want to have the switch, this bug doesn't make
sense. With the same reasoning one could open a bugreport for switching
to ikiwiki. And to some degree I would even see the good in the
latter. :)

 So long,
Rhonda


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Bug#501954: use MediaWiki instead of MoinMoin

2008-10-14 Thread jidanni
If MediaWiki is to be crossed off the longterm wishlist, so be it.
You all have a clearer view of each wiki's momentum than I.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#501954: use MediaWiki instead of MoinMoin

2008-10-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 05:50:29AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Package: wiki.debian.org
 Severity: wishlist
 
 I hereby propose wiki.debian.org be moved from MoinMoin to the popular
 MediaWiki software.
 
 I expect this proposal to sit here for several years slowly gaining
 supporters (so please don't just stamp it wontfix, etc.) By that time
 there will be even more programs available to do the conversion than now.

There is a page on the Wiki where others (including me) already brought
this up, please find it and link it (or maybe better to paste it).

Mentioning only popular as the argument for MediaWiki does not do it
justice, in fact maybe even the opposite...

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#501954: use MediaWiki instead of MoinMoin

2008-10-13 Thread jidanni
OK, now I made http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/Engine and
http://wiki.debian.org/HelpMoveDebianWikiToMediaWiki also link back to
this bug so users can better find this proposal in the BTS rather than
opening a new wishlist. The pros and cons are already mentioned on
those web pages. Just let this bug be a longterm standing request to
compliment those web pages. No action required for now. Thanks.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#501954: use MediaWiki instead of MoinMoin

2008-10-12 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi,

On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 05:50:29AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Package: wiki.debian.org
 Severity: wishlist
 
 I hereby propose wiki.debian.org be moved from MoinMoin to the popular
 MediaWiki software.
 
 I expect this proposal to sit here for several years slowly gaining
 supporters (so please don't just stamp it wontfix, etc.) By that time
 there will be even more programs available to do the conversion than now.

Unless  MediaWiki conversion (including table support) and XML export
capability exist, I strongly oppose it.  It breaks debian-reference
package maintenance.

I do not mind if other URL is used and provide another site if someone
maintain.

Osamu




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#501954: use MediaWiki instead of MoinMoin

2008-10-12 Thread Franklin PIAT
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 05:50 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Package: wiki.debian.org
 Severity: wishlist
 
 I hereby propose wiki.debian.org be moved from MoinMoin to the popular
 MediaWiki software.

Please provide rationale for this proposal.

 I expect this proposal to sit here for several years slowly gaining
 supporters (so please don't just stamp it wontfix, etc.) By that time
 there will be even more programs available to do the conversion than
 now.

Unless you provide some rationale, I would close this wishlist.

BTW, The following pages are considered replace to elaborate :
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/Engine
http://wiki.debian.org/HelpMoveDebianWikiToMediaWiki

Franklin




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#501954: use MediaWiki instead of MoinMoin

2008-10-11 Thread jidanni
Package: wiki.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

I hereby propose wiki.debian.org be moved from MoinMoin to the popular
MediaWiki software.

I expect this proposal to sit here for several years slowly gaining
supporters (so please don't just stamp it wontfix, etc.) By that time
there will be even more programs available to do the conversion than now.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]