X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3616 - in trunk/driver: . xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev/debian xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev/debian/patches xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev/man xs

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: ijc Date: 2006-10-05 02:09:29 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3616 Added: trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev/ trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev/COPYING trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev/ChangeLog trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev/Makefile.am

Re: debian ivtv driver

2006-10-05 Thread Ian Campbell
Hi, I've added debian-x to the cc since others may be interested in my response. (I typo'd the list address first time round, sorry for the second copy you may receive) On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 02:58 +, Dhaval Patel wrote: Hi Ian, I saw your post on the Debian list at

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3616 - in trunk/driver: . xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev/debian xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev/debian/patches xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev/ma

2006-10-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 02:09 -0400, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin Unfortunately the driver does not currently work with X.org 7.1. The package includes a patch whcih makes it compile and not segfault but unfortunately the screen remains blank. More investigation/hacking is required.

Bug#391048: jabref shows a blank window under compiz

2006-10-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 19:52 +0200, Armin Berres wrote: Teemu Ikonen wrote: The bibliography manager Jabref is unusable when started under compiz. The splashscreen of jabref displays ok, but the main window does not show any widgets, only the blue-gray background color fills the window.

Bug#371065: how about sarge and sid?

2006-10-05 Thread Gebhardt Thomas
Hi, just two bits of additional information: * xfree86 from sarge works fine for me * dist-upgrade to current sid doesn't solve my problem. I run into an infinite loop Respawn - Watch pointer - Arrow pointer. Cheers, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#391192: xkb-data: Symbols for Logitech Cordless Desktop Optical are lacking

2006-10-05 Thread Lionel VAUX
Package: xkb-data Version: 0.8-15 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/base defines a model name for Logitech Cordless Desktop Optical: logicdo. This is not used anywhere else in the package, hence choosing logicdo as keyboard model results in using a default model. In

Bug#391048: jabref shows a blank window under compiz

2006-10-05 Thread Armin Berres
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 19:52 +0200, Armin Berres wrote: Another strange thing: Moving this gray Window needs 100% of the CPU while moving a normal Windows doesn't really stress the CPU. Which process hogs the CPU? Xorg. Another thing: Typing (on the keyboard) also needs

Bug#276143: Still present (Re: Bug#276143: altwin:meta_win breaks 3rd level modifier (AltGr))

2006-10-05 Thread Lionel VAUX
Package: xkb-data Version: 0.8-15 Followup-For: Bug #276143 This bug is still present in versions 0.8-12 (testing) and 0.8-15 (unstable). The patch from Jean-Christophe Dubacq worked for me and seems to solve a quite longstanding bug. Is there anything wrong with this patch ? iouri. -- System

What to do with backtraces?

2006-10-05 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hi, my X server dies often. What should I do with the backtraces? I can't read them. Therefore I don't know if a backtrace belongs to an already reported bug or not. Should I file a new bugreport for every backtrace I get? BTW: How informative these backtraces are for you? Do you find bugs with

Re: What to do with backtraces?

2006-10-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 23:38 +, Jörg Sommer wrote: my X server dies often. What should I do with the backtraces? I can't read them. Therefore I don't know if a backtrace belongs to an already reported bug or not. Should I file a new bugreport for every backtrace I get? As server crashes

Bug#391224: this version doesnt work with the version of xorg-server it states as dependency

2006-10-05 Thread Martin Lemmen
Package: xserver-xorg-video-sunffb Version: 1:1.1.0-1 my sunffb package was upgraded by aptitude on wed, 4 oct. i didnt request specific versions of anything manually, i was just running update and upgrade. the next time i booted the computer, the xserver wouldn't start. the error message at

Bug#390503: killing gconf helps, unseting not

2006-10-05 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, deleting the gconf* and gnome2* folders helps - after that I had window-borders with compiz. Is this a general compiz/gconf bug, or did it happen because of the previos installation of compiz from the ubunti package from compiz.net? Unsetting XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS did not help (the variable

Bug#391228: compiz: does not work correctly with twinview

2006-10-05 Thread Evgeni Golov
Package: compiz Version: 0.0.13+git20060928-2 Severity: normal Hi, I've just tried out the new compiz packages and they seem to work ok with a single-screen setup. But I have a dual one (1024x768+1280x1024) and compiz seems not to recognize that. When I maximize a window, it gets as big as my

Bug#391072: compiz: screen looks completely white, but some effects are present

2006-10-05 Thread Claudio Saavedra
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:47 -0700, Nick Rusnov wrote: I had exactly this problem on the same hardware. I had installed etch and upgraded to unstable (well, partially), in order to run compiz. It turns out the 'partially' nature of the upgrade was the culprit, at least in part, in that when I

IMPORTANT: xorg sparc driver version mismatch in testing

2006-10-05 Thread Jurij Smakov
Hi, As was recently pointed out in #391224, the new sparc xorg drivers (1:1.1.0-1) do not have a correct dependency on the new xorg-server, so they have propagated to testing ahead of the xorg-server against which they have been built. If you are using xorg on sparc in *testing*, and have

Re: IMPORTANT: xorg sparc driver version mismatch in testing

2006-10-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 09:47 -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote: Hi, As was recently pointed out in #391224, the new sparc xorg drivers (1:1.1.0-1) do not have a correct dependency on the new xorg-server, so they have propagated to testing ahead of the xorg-server against which they have been

Re: IMPORTANT: xorg sparc driver version mismatch in testing

2006-10-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 19:15 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: This all sounds like these drivers don't have the correct Provides: xserver-xorg-video(-1.0) either. Actually, I guess there's nothing that prevents a driver providing xserver-xorg-video-1.0 from getting installed with

Re: Help compiling 4.3.0 for 3.1 stable

2006-10-05 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Robin Whittle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I installed packages dbs (0.34), debhelper (4.2.3), build-essential (10.1), debian-builder (1.3-5), devscripts (2.8.14). dbs is Doogies Build System: You will almost certainly need to install a number of additional packages; apt-get build-dep

Processed: Re: Bug#391187: [INTL:nl] updated Dutch po-debconf translation

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 391187 pending Bug#391187: [INTL:nl] updated Dutch po-debconf translation Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#391187: [INTL:nl] updated Dutch po-debconf translation

2006-10-05 Thread Christian Perrier
tags 391187 pending thanks Quoting Bart Cornelis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Package: xorg Version: 1:7.1.0-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Updated dutch translation is attached Committed. And, as written on #boot: 20:04 bubulle fjp: 5f in samba debconf templates, 1f in debconf

Bug#276143: Still present (Re: Bug#276143: altwin:meta_win breaks 3rd level modifier (AltGr))

2006-10-05 Thread Denis Barbier
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Lionel VAUX wrote: Package: xkb-data Version: 0.8-15 Followup-For: Bug #276143 This bug is still present in versions 0.8-12 (testing) and 0.8-15 (unstable). The patch from Jean-Christophe Dubacq worked for me and seems to solve a quite longstanding

Processing of xkeyboard-config_0.8-18_i386.changes

2006-10-05 Thread Archive Administrator
xkeyboard-config_0.8-18_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xkeyboard-config_0.8-18.dsc xkeyboard-config_0.8-18.diff.gz xkb-data_0.8-18_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3618 - in trunk/data/xkb-data/debian: . patches

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: barbier Date: 2006-10-05 18:32:11 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3618 Added: trunk/data/xkb-data/debian/patches/japan.diff Removed: trunk/data/xkb-data/debian/patches/finnish-macron.diff trunk/data/xkb-data/debian/patches/mac-gb-euro.diff

Bug#391304: IMO, right-clicking in xterm should bring up the font size menu

2006-10-05 Thread Jason Spiro
Package: xterm Version: 210-3 IMO, right-clicking in xterm should bring up the font size menu (currently only accessible by Control+rightclick). The font menu would be more useful than the current feature that is bound to the right mouse button (extend selection). Plus, most people currently

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3619 - tags/data/xkb-data

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: barbier Date: 2006-10-05 18:36:53 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3619 Added: tags/data/xkb-data/0.8-18/ Log: Tagging xkeyboard-config 0.8-18 Copied: tags/data/xkb-data/0.8-18 (from rev 3618, trunk/data/xkb-data) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

xkeyboard-config_0.8-18_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: xkb-data_0.8-18_all.deb to pool/main/x/xkeyboard-config/xkb-data_0.8-18_all.deb xkeyboard-config_0.8-18.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xkeyboard-config/xkeyboard-config_0.8-18.diff.gz xkeyboard-config_0.8-18.dsc to pool/main/x/xkeyboard-config/xkeyboard-config_0.8-18.dsc Override

Bug#390271: Resizing and scrolling very slow with r200

2006-10-05 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:30:43AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 20:15 -0400, David Nusinow wrote: On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:23:33PM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 13:53 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: Assuming you're using XAA with Option

Bug#391072: marked as done (compiz: screen looks completely white, but some effects are present)

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:35:58 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#391072: compiz: screen looks completely white, but some effects are present has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3622 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-10-05 21:59:53 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3622 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog trunk/debian/xorg/debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in trunk/debian/xorg/debian/xserver-xorg.templates Log: * Make ImPS/2 the default mouse port in the

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3623 - in trunk/debian/xorg/debian: . local

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-10-05 22:06:20 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3623 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog trunk/debian/xorg/debian/local/dexconf Log: * Have dexconf actually use the mouse protocol and port selected during debconf config. Thanks Ilguiz Latypov.

Bug#390416: marked as done (compiz-core: missing dependency on libxcomposite1 = 1:0.3-1)

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:32:41 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#390304: compiz --replace fails to launch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Setting Severity

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 389429 important Bug#389429: xserver-xorg: Crashes on startup after the upgrade to 7.1 Severity set to `important' from `grave' severity 390630 important Bug#390630: xorg hangs on logout when used with this driver Severity set to `important'

Bug#388011: marked as done (xserver-xorg.config needs /var/lib/x11 from x11-common; .config scripts can't count on Pre-Depends)

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:35:51 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388011: xserver-xorg.config needs /var/lib/x11 from x11-common; .config scripts can't count on Pre-Depends has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#390304: marked as done (compiz: Bad build-depends causing FTBFS and bad depends)

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:32:41 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#390304: compiz --replace fails to launch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3624 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-10-05 22:22:01 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3624 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog Log: Prepare changelog for upload Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog === ---

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3625 - tags/debian/xorg

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-10-05 22:22:33 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3625 Added: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.1.0-3/ Log: Tagging upload of xorg-1:7.1.0-3 to unstable. Copied: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.1.0-3 (from rev 3624, trunk/debian/xorg) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#379480: iMac Indigo freezes after upgrade to Sid

2006-10-05 Thread Jiří Paleček
Hello, On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:25:18 +0200, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 23:59 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 05:20:38PM +0200, Jan Stedehouder wrote: Hi, I have the following problem. After upgrading from Debian Sarge to Sid I

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3626 - tags/debian/xorg

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-10-05 22:26:15 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3626 Removed: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.1.0-3/ Log: Remove botched commit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3627 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-10-05 22:26:55 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3627 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/xserver-xorg.templates Log: Fix default. Thanks Frans Pop for catching this in the nick of time Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/xserver-xorg.templates

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3628 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-10-05 22:45:35 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3628 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog Log: Fix changelog message and prepare for upload. Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3629 - tags/debian/xorg

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-10-05 22:45:49 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3629 Added: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.1.0-3/ Log: Tagging upload of xorg-1:7.1.0-3 to unstable. Copied: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.1.0-3 (from rev 3628, trunk/debian/xorg) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#360852: marked as done (Unpurgeable: problem with postrm script)

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:15:49 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#360852: Unpurgeable: problem with postrm script has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#353992: marked as done (xserver-xorg dosn't purge cleanly)

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:15:49 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#360852: Unpurgeable: problem with postrm script has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#351326: marked as done (xserver-xorg: trouble purging)

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:15:49 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#360852: Unpurgeable: problem with postrm script has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#390956: marked as done (xorg: [INTL:zh_CN] Updated simplified Chinese translation)

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:02:23 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#390956: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#385078: marked as done (xserver-xorg: impossible mouse configuration other than /dev/input/mice)

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:02:23 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#385078: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#376055: marked as done (x11-common: dexconf ignores mouse port and protocol selections)

2006-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:02:23 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#376055: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3630 - trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sunbw2/debian

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: jurij Date: 2006-10-05 23:34:42 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3630 Modified: trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sunbw2/debian/changelog trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sunbw2/debian/control Log: The first in the send more brown paper bags series of commits. Fix the versioned

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3631 - trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suncg14/debian

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: jurij Date: 2006-10-05 23:42:55 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3631 Modified: trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suncg14/debian/changelog trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suncg14/debian/control Log: Fix the version of dependency on xserver-xorg-core. Modified:

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3632 - trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suncg3/debian

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: jurij Date: 2006-10-05 23:47:29 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3632 Modified: trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suncg3/debian/changelog trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suncg3/debian/control Log: Fix the version of dependency on xserver-xorg-core. Modified:

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3633 - trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suncg6/debian

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: jurij Date: 2006-10-05 23:50:05 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3633 Modified: trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suncg6/debian/changelog trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suncg6/debian/control Log: Fix the version of dependency on xserver-xorg-core. Modified:

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3634 - trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sunffb/debian

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: jurij Date: 2006-10-05 23:52:41 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3634 Modified: trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sunffb/debian/changelog trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sunffb/debian/control Log: Fix the version of dependency on xserver-xorg-core. Modified:

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3635 - trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sunleo/debian

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: jurij Date: 2006-10-05 23:54:54 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3635 Modified: trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sunleo/debian/changelog trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sunleo/debian/control Log: Fix the version of the dependency on xserver-xorg-core. Modified:

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3636 - trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suntcx/debian

2006-10-05 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: jurij Date: 2006-10-05 23:57:33 -0400 (Thu, 05 Oct 2006) New Revision: 3636 Modified: trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suntcx/debian/changelog trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-video-suntcx/debian/control Log: Fix the versioned dependency on xserver-xorg-core. Modified:

Bug#391304: IMO, right-clicking in xterm should bring up the font size menu

2006-10-05 Thread Marc Wilson
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:12:15PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote: IMO, right-clicking in xterm should bring up the font size menu (currently only accessible by Control+rightclick). And in MY opinion, not. Gee, we offset each other, don't we? And both our opinions are even valid. Fortunately, Tom

Re: IMPORTANT: xorg sparc driver version mismatch in testing

2006-10-05 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:47:46AM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote: As was recently pointed out in #391224, the new sparc xorg drivers (1:1.1.0-1) do not have a correct dependency on the new xorg-server, so they have propagated to testing ahead of the xorg-server against which they have been

Re: Feature Freeze

2006-10-05 Thread Drew Parsons
David Nusinow wrote: I thought you had made a simple mistake in calling the freeze before they had been processed, so I thought I was providing a service in helping get them done as quick as possible. It was a simple mistake, you were 100% right in that. So it's like this. You

Bug#391224: this version doesnt work with the version of xorg-server it states as dependency

2006-10-05 Thread Jurij Smakov
Hi Martin, You are absolutely right. By an oversight the versioned dependency of the drivers on xserver-xorg-core has not been updated in the recent upload, causing the unintended propagation of drivers to testing. I'll be uploading a new version with correct dependency soon. I have also