Re: HELP!! Re: Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!

2006-04-29 Thread Andreas Metzler
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (gmane.linux.debian.devel.x) you wrote: Hi, I need some help or suggestions or something. My package WMRack builds fine here--but I haven't yet upgraded to the new modular X. It fails to build on Debian's autobuilders though, and I'm darned if I have any idea why.

Re: HELP!! Re: Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!

2006-04-29 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-04-29 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (gmane.linux.debian.devel.x) you wrote: [cannot find X] The build-dependencies (which worked before) are: libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxpm-dev, xutils, debhelper (= 4.0.0) and the autoconf stanza (from

Re: Bug#365126: HELP!! Re: Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!

2006-04-29 Thread Chris Waters
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:03:28PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2006-04-29 Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Er, no, that's AC_PATH_XTRA. AC_PATH_X searches for [X11],[X11/Xlib.h],[XrmInitialize ()]. [...] Only in Debian (yet) and only since since autoconf 2.59a-4 (#327655).

HELP!! Re: Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!

2006-04-28 Thread Chris Waters
Hi, I need some help or suggestions or something. My package WMRack builds fine here--but I haven't yet upgraded to the new modular X. It fails to build on Debian's autobuilders though, and I'm darned if I have any idea why. I am the sole upstream maintainer of this package as well as the Debian

Re: HELP!! Re: Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!

2006-04-28 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -I${x_includes} LIBS=$LIBS -L${x_libraries} -lX11 x_includes and x_libraries now expand to the empty string, biting anything that assumed otherwise. Accounting for that isn't too hard, though: CFLAGS=$CFLAGS

Re: HELP!! Re: Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!

2006-04-28 Thread Chris Waters
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:24:11PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: x_includes and x_libraries now expand to the empty string, biting anything that assumed otherwise. Hi, Aaron, thanks, that's definitely useful information, and I will be incorporating your patch, but I don't think it addresses the