Re: Updated Debian XFree86 4.x mini-FAQ and status report

2000-10-07 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
* Stop complaining about the size of these experimental packages, particularly xlibs-dev; they contain everything that they are supposed to per Debian policy, and will get much smaller when I do the official release because I will be stripping them. I am presently not stripping

Re: Updated Debian XFree86 4.x mini-FAQ and status report

2000-10-06 Thread reiner
Hello Branden, Hello all, Here is a list of issues that are delaying official Debian XFree86 4.x packages: * The Mesa problem (specifically, the lack of libGLU.so) really has to be sorted out upstream if Debian is going to have a sensible handling of Mesa in our

Re: Updated Debian XFree86 4.x mini-FAQ and status report

2000-10-02 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 05:30:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: * The Mesa problem (specifically, the lack of libGLU.so) really has to be sorted out upstream if Debian is going to have a sensible handling of Mesa in our distribution. Alternatively, I can stop shipping the Mesa

Re: Updated Debian XFree86 4.x mini-FAQ and status report

2000-10-02 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 05:30:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: * The Mesa problem (specifically, the lack of libGLU.so) really has to be sorted out upstream if Debian is going to have a sensible handling of Mesa in our distribution. Alternatively, I can stop shipping the Mesa stuff

Updated Debian XFree86 4.x mini-FAQ and status report

2000-10-01 Thread Branden Robinson
Feel free reproduce this mail anywhere you like. Reply to the list debian-x@lists.debian.org. Do not send mail to me privately. * To use DRI you need a proper kernel version (not to mention a card supported by current DRI code). Unfortunately there is no official Linux kernel with the