Re: g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-26 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:24:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: Well, XFree86 CVS just resynced with the DRI at sourceforge, the Mesa version is now 3.4, etc. etc. Maybe try a bleeding edge kernel? That worked, but I also had to get rid of the binary driver from Matrox. Although the

Re: g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-26 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:24:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: Well, XFree86 CVS just resynced with the DRI at sourceforge, the Mesa version is now 3.4, etc. etc. Maybe try a bleeding edge kernel? That worked, but I also had to get rid of the binary driver from Matrox. Although the

g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-25 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
When I left work last Friday, everything was working well with phase2v8. My G400 was providing nice, hardware-accelerated textures, and I was happy. Today, however, I upgraded to phase2v10, and I was immediately disappointed to find out that I no longer get hardware acceleration for OpenGL apps.

Re: g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:51:59PM -0500, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote: First, I looked at the logged output from X. There was a conflict between drm 1.0 and 2.0 or something like that, and the next statement was "dri disabled". Shucks. [...] Any ideas? Well, XFree86 CVS just resynced with the

g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-25 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
When I left work last Friday, everything was working well with phase2v8. My G400 was providing nice, hardware-accelerated textures, and I was happy. Today, however, I upgraded to phase2v10, and I was immediately disappointed to find out that I no longer get hardware acceleration for OpenGL apps.

Re: g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:51:59PM -0500, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote: First, I looked at the logged output from X. There was a conflict between drm 1.0 and 2.0 or something like that, and the next statement was dri disabled. Shucks. [...] Any ideas? Well, XFree86 CVS just resynced with the DRI

Re: g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-25 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:24:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: First, I looked at the logged output from X. There was a conflict between drm 1.0 and 2.0 or something like that, and the next statement was dri disabled. Shucks. [...] Any ideas? In the snipped-out part of the quote, I