On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 07:59:57AM -0500, Ashley Clark wrote:
I think the MANIFEST.i386 file is missing the glxinfo lines, actually I
know it is. It seems odd that it would compile for Branden without it and
not I... strange.
It is likely that I went ahead and finished the build by hand after
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:59:58AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently opened a bug against fvwm describing the observed misbehaviour
but I'd like to get a little bit of a feel for what other multihead X
users are using for window
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 04:47:09PM +0200, Torbjörn Andersson wrote:
Branden Robinson wrote:
* Yes, the shared memory extension is broken in recent phase2 packages.
This is a recent development in upstream CVS. If you'd like to help fix
it, subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and pursue
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000925 08:51]:
Use +xinerama.
No can do, unless one of you guys can figure out how to do xinerama
between a colour display and a greyscale display. ;)
Very simple -- make the color display the same bitdepth as the
grayscale.
(Not pretty, but
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Simon Kongshoj wrote:
Can that down-clocking hurt the card in any way?
No. I ran with mine without problems for months before I realized it
didn't set the value right. :)
Me too, but the card did have trouble once in that time... had to replace
the
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Seth Arnold wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000925 08:51]:
Use +xinerama.
No can do, unless one of you guys can figure out how to do xinerama
between a colour display and a greyscale display. ;)
Very simple -- make the color display the same
When I left work last Friday, everything was working well with phase2v8.
My G400 was providing nice, hardware-accelerated textures, and I was happy.
Today, however, I upgraded to phase2v10, and I was immediately disappointed
to find out that I no longer get hardware acceleration for OpenGL apps.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:51:59PM -0500, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote:
First, I looked at the logged output from X. There was a conflict between
drm 1.0 and 2.0 or something like that, and the next statement was "dri
disabled". Shucks.
[...]
Any ideas?
Well, XFree86 CVS just resynced with the
Please upgrade to v10; I think there is something in xfree86-common that
err, addresses your bug report.
- Forwarded message from Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: asd
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:46:29 -0400
Someone wanna mail him what I've already told everyone else?
- Forwarded message from Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: phase 2 v 9, SHM BUGs (ignore if you are already aware)
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 21:48:59 +1100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL
Wow, one I haven't heard before.
- Forwarded message from WOL - Andreas Plesner Jacobsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
From: WOL - Andreas Plesner Jacobsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Small XFree86 4.0.1-0phase2v9 bug
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 18:26:15 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL
Yo, you're not sending your complaints to the right address.
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 05:01:24PM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote:
Yo, when I try to run Eterm I get the following errors:
IMLIB ERROR: SHM can't get SHM Identifier for Shared Pixmap Wrapper
Falling back on Shared XImages
Recently I decided I wanted to have a button bar with a clock and the
pager in it on my primary display, and while configuring it I discovered
that I had two instances of FvwmIconMan and FvwmPager on each of my two
heads. It seems from the way fvwm loads, that it is spawning another
instance of
Branden Robinson wrote:
* Yes, the shared memory extension is broken in recent phase2 packages.
This is a recent development in upstream CVS. If you'd like to help fix
it, subscribe to xpert@xfree86.org and pursue the issue there; please try
to submit helpful bug reports to upstream,
* Branden Robinson in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Small XFree86 4.0.1-0phase2v9 bug]
* dated 2000/09/24 23:15 wrote:
Wow, one I haven't heard before.
- Forwarded message from WOL - Andreas Plesner Jacobsen [EMAIL
PROTECTED] -
From: WOL - Andreas Plesner Jacobsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
FYI, it seems the latest X CVS has the SHM problem fixed.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],havoc,gaeshido}.fi,{debian,wanderer}.org,stonesoft.com}
unix, linux, debian, networks, security, | The Web site you seek
kernel, TCP/IP, C, perl, free software, | cannot be located but
mail, www, sw devel,
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Josip Rodin bashed his keyboard into the wall and
hit the folllowing keys:
Can that down-clocking hurt the card in any way?
No. I ran with mine without problems for months before I realized it
didn't set the value right. :)
--
Simon Kongshoj - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:59:58AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently opened a bug against fvwm describing the observed misbehaviour
but I'd like to get a little bit of a feel for what other multihead X
users are using for window
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 04:47:09PM +0200, Torbjörn Andersson wrote:
Branden Robinson wrote:
* Yes, the shared memory extension is broken in recent phase2 packages.
This is a recent development in upstream CVS. If you'd like to help fix
it, subscribe to xpert@xfree86.org and pursue
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000925 08:51]:
Use +xinerama.
No can do, unless one of you guys can figure out how to do xinerama
between a colour display and a greyscale display. ;)
Very simple -- make the color display the same bitdepth as the
grayscale.
(Not pretty, but
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Simon Kongshoj wrote:
Can that down-clocking hurt the card in any way?
No. I ran with mine without problems for months before I realized it
didn't set the value right. :)
Me too, but the card did have trouble once in that time... had to replace
the
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Seth Arnold wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000925 08:51]:
Use +xinerama.
No can do, unless one of you guys can figure out how to do xinerama
between a colour display and a greyscale display. ;)
Very simple -- make the color display the same
When I left work last Friday, everything was working well with phase2v8.
My G400 was providing nice, hardware-accelerated textures, and I was happy.
Today, however, I upgraded to phase2v10, and I was immediately disappointed
to find out that I no longer get hardware acceleration for OpenGL apps.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:51:59PM -0500, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote:
First, I looked at the logged output from X. There was a conflict between
drm 1.0 and 2.0 or something like that, and the next statement was dri
disabled. Shucks.
[...]
Any ideas?
Well, XFree86 CVS just resynced with the DRI
Please upgrade to v10; I think there is something in xfree86-common that
err, addresses your bug report.
- Forwarded message from Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: asd
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:46:29 -0400
Branden, thanks for putting in that great all-caps header file. I
especially liked the part about the upset X maintainer. :)
Thanks for all the effort. I am enjoying using XF86 4.0.1! :)
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:09:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Please upgrade to v10; I think there is something in xfree86-common that
err, addresses your bug report.
Ok, thanks for helping me find the bug report instructions.
Since this feels like a packaging problem (behavior changed
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 11:37:31PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:09:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Please upgrade to v10; I think there is something in xfree86-common that
err, addresses your bug report.
Ok, thanks for helping me find the bug report
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:24:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
First, I looked at the logged output from X. There was a conflict
between drm 1.0 and 2.0 or something like that, and the next statement
was dri disabled. Shucks.
[...]
Any ideas?
In the snipped-out part of the quote, I
29 matches
Mail list logo
