Bug#438098: xdm: Useless calls of laptop-detect in maintainer scripts

2007-08-15 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: xdm Version: 1:1.1.4-3 Severity: minor The xdm maintainer scripts all contain superfluous calls of laptop-detect in the following snippet: , | LAPTOP= | if [ -n $(which laptop-detect) ]; then | if laptop-detect /dev/null; then | LAPTOP=true | fi | fi ` The LAPTOP

Bug#332753: xlibmesa-gl-dev: cannot link OpenGL app: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find, -lGL

2005-10-09 Thread Sven Joachim
Do you have nvidia-glx installed? That package diverts some files in the xlibmesa-gl package, which leads to the dangling symlink /usr/lib/libGL.so. Here's what dpkg -L xlibmesa-gl prints for me: /. /usr /usr/X11R6 /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 diverted by nvidia-glx to:

Bug#332753: xlibmesa-gl-dev: cannot link OpenGL app: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find, -lGL

2005-10-09 Thread Sven Joachim
severity 332753 important thanks Andre Heynatz wrote: I have read bug report #208198 and am somewhat confused. It has become a combinatorical problem, and my head smokes. But there seems to be an easy way out: libGL.so.1 is linked to different files whether Mesa or nVidia libs are used:

Bug#315195: Symlink for x-terminal-emulator.1.gz is still dangling here

2007-02-06 Thread Sven Joachim
Found 315195 223-1 thanks Somehow the symlink /usr/share/man/man1/x-terminal-emulator.1.gz is dangling on my system: $ ls -l /usr/share/man/man1/x-terminal-emulator.1.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2007-02-02 17:59 /usr/share/man/man1/x-terminal-emulator.1.gz -

Bug#373711: libxv1: missing copyright file

2006-06-15 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: libxv1 Version: 1:1.0.1-3 Severity: serious The copyright file is missing in /usr/share/doc/libxv1. Please add it as mandated by section 12.5 of the Debian Policy Manual. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable')

Bug#457900: xfs: upgrade from xterm freezes X server

2008-03-16 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-03-16 01:35 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: Last time I saw problems while upgrading xfs, my xterm/dist-upgrade was unable to display anything, but it was still upgrading things in background. So xfs finally got restarted at the end of the upgrade and I got everything working as before.

Bug#50859: xfs Bug #50859: use start-stop-daemon --chuid ?

2008-05-16 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-05-12 08:15 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Ah, right. This work better. Now the xfs process is running as user nobody. This is the patch. diff -ur xfs-1.0.6/debian/xfs.init xfs-1.0.6.pere/debian/xfs.init --- xfs-1.0.6/debian/xfs.init 2008-05-12 08:13:32.0 +0200 +++

Bug#50859: xfs Bug #50859: use start-stop-daemon --chuid ?

2008-05-16 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-05-16 13:07 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:16:20 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: Just FYI, I've been running xfs with this patch for the last few days and don't have any problems. Could this be uploaded to unstable to get xfs back into testing? One question

Bug#50859: xfs Bug #50859: use start-stop-daemon --chuid ?

2008-05-17 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-05-16 23:43 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Sven Joachim] Not at all, good catch. I just didn't know it even has a log file. How about compiling with -DUSE_SYSLOG? I must admit, I would prefer xfs logging to syslog. When debugging the segfault in #148650, the first place I

Bug#481758: xfs: Please build with syslog support

2008-05-18 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: xfs Version: 1:1.0.6-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Following the recent discussion in #50859, I hereby request that xfs should be compiled with syslog support. This is achieved by #defining USE_SYSLOG, you probably want to do add -DUSE_SYSLOG to CFLAGS or CPPFLAGS. Here is a patch

Bug#451617: xdm: Please remove /usr/bin/X11 from $PATH

2007-11-17 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: xdm Version: 1:1.1.6-3 Severity: minor Tags: patch The default PATH in /etc/X11/xdm/xdm-config still contains the /usr/bin/X11 directory, which is redundant for X.Org 7.0 and higher (and xdm cannot be used with earlier X11 versions anyway). Please remove these entries: --- xdm-config~

Bug#547443: xterm: wrong backspace key behavior in xterm{16,256,88}-color

2009-09-19 Thread Sven Joachim
=db203a5a4d30f9b3effaf746c38b8bad0aa5b5f8 From a7092a6cf56f8bfef23501a6bab5a7325a8835c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:25:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Derive xterm{16,256,88}-color from xterm-debian With TERM=xterm-256color, the backspace key would delete

Bug#362313: breaking the xserver-xorg-* circular dependency?

2008-12-04 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-12-04 21:17 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: Hi, for some reason, the etch-lenny upgrade results in epic fail when using aptitude, because random X driver packages get removed. At least if one accepts the first solution offered by aptitude, the subsequent ones are usually better. I'm

Bug#362313: breaking the xserver-xorg-* circular dependency?

2008-12-06 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-12-04 21:54 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2008-12-04 21:17 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: Hi, for some reason, the etch-lenny upgrade results in epic fail when using aptitude, because random X driver packages get removed. At least if one accepts the first solution offered

Bug#362313: yet another devil in the xorg dependency hell

2009-04-17 Thread Sven Joachim
Hi, I just discovered another problem related to the xorg dependency hell. On my laptop, where I don't want to upgrade to xorg 7.4 just yet, I tried to put it on hold with aptitude hold xserver-xorg. Much to my surprise, aptitude safe-upgrade would upgrade xserver-xorg-core and the input drivers

Bug#524822: xserver-xorg-core: X: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application

2009-04-20 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 2:1.6.1-1 The following message from libgrcypt11 appears in the syslog whenever X starts: X: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application -- Package-specific info: Contents of /var/lib/x11/X.roster: xserver-xorg

Bug#522358: xserver-xorg-video-intel: [945GM + KMS] Misdetection of TV output

2009-06-24 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-04-03 05:34 +0200, Piotr Lewandowski wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel Version: 2:2.6.1-1 Severity: normal When I start X on a freshly booted system (kernel mode-setting enabled) it starts with allegedly TV output connected, thus setting the wrong resolution (1024x768

Bug#522358: xserver-xorg-video-intel: [945GM + KMS] Misdetection of TV output

2009-06-29 Thread Sven Joachim
reassign 522358 linux-2.6 reassign 533550 linux-2.6 merge 522358 533550 tags 522358 + fixed-upstream thanks On 2009-06-24 22:36 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2009-04-03 05:34 +0200, Piotr Lewandowski wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel Version: 2:2.6.1-1 Severity: normal When I

Bug#482551: xfs: segfaults at startup

2008-05-23 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: xfs Version: 1:1.0.7-1 Severity: grave xfs segfaults at startup, citing /var/log/messages after /etc/init.d/xfs start: , | xfs[5728]: segfault at eip b7df5be3 esp bfa7a95c error 4 ` -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy:

Bug#489232: xfs: missing syslog dependency in init script

2008-07-04 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: xfs Version: 1:1.0.8-1.1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: incorrect-dependency Now that xfs uses syslog by default, the init script needs to depend on the syslog facility, otherwise xfs might be started before syslog which is bad. Here is the patch:

Bug#500722: xfs: stop links in runlevels 0 and 6 are unnecessary

2008-09-30 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: xfs Version: 1:1.0.8-2 Severity: wishlist There is currently a small but noticeable slowdown when turning off the machine due to xfs' inability to remove its own pid file (see #498823). This could be circumvented by not running the stop script in runlevels 0 and 6; since xfs doesn't have

Bug#559852: xinit: --tmpdir is not supported by Lenny's mktemp

2009-12-06 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: xinit Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: important Quoting the Debian changelog: , | xinit (1.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low | | [ Julien Cristau ] | * 06_move_serverauthfile_into_tmp.diff: use mktemp --tmpdir to honour | $TMPDIR (closes: #480958). ` The mktemp version in Lenny

Bug#578026: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: should not migrate to testing before linux-2.6

2010-04-21 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-04-19 20:37 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 09:40:05 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Version: 1:0.0.15+git20100329+7858345-3 Severity: serious This package needs the nouveau.ko kernel module which is not available in Squeeze

Bug#578026: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: should not migrate to testing before linux-2.6

2010-04-25 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-04-22 15:15 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 18:54:17 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: So you are saying: It does not really matter that the package is unusable, because it isn't used by default. Interesting point of view, but not quite in the spirit of http

Bug#579562: /etc/init.d/x11-common should wait till mountall-bootclean is done

2010-04-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-04-28 18:45 +0200, Steven Hudson wrote: Package: x11-common Version: 1:7.5+5 Severity: normal The script /etc/init.d/x11-common adds directories to /tmp but the script mountall-bootclean could delete them. Could you elaborate? I think this cannot really happen, at least not during

Bug#580307: nouveau: Hibernation restore problem. Computer hangs

2010-05-12 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-12 00:41 +0200, Vassilis Virvilis wrote: On 07/05/2010 06:34 μμ, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 08:51:13 +0300, Vassilis Virvilis wrote: This is likely a kernel issue. Can you try a newer kernel (2.6.34-rc or so)? Note that will require a new libdrm and

Bug#579425: Still no dice, but a segfault instead

2010-05-12 Thread Sven Joachim
; urgency=low + + * New patch 04_fix_nouveau_bo_new_tile_segfault.diff, backported from +upstream commit df32c307e8f81b46ee8aa4dd7222fc18f175bbb3. + + -- Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Thu, 13 May 2010 07:06:57 +0200 + libdrm (2.4.18-5) unstable; urgency=low * Upload to unstable. diff -u libdrm

Bug#579425: Still no dice, but a segfault instead

2010-05-13 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-13 15:14 +0200, Stefan Monnier wrote: So I upgraded to 2.6.32-12 (after spending some time to finally understand it's named 2.6.32-5) as well as 2.6.33-experimentl4 (couldn't find the experimental5 you mention), and booted without the vga= argument. The result is a segfault

Re: libdrm: Changes to 'ubuntu'

2010-05-14 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-14 20:27 +0200, Robert Hooker wrote: libdrm (2.4.20-2ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low - * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes: + * Merge from debian experimental, remaining changes: - Dropped patches: 02_fix_kms_detection_with_linux_backport_modules.diff

Re: libdrm: Changes to 'ubuntu'

2010-05-14 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-14 22:16 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 21:16:03 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: You will get interesting segfaults in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (and other rdepends of libdrm-nouveau1, if there are any) after this ABI break without soname bump. Anyone who has

Re: Ubuntu X plans for the next release

2010-05-22 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-21 12:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 17:53:37 +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: We'll be on a 2.6.35 kernel, so we'll have the new 0.0.16 nouveau ABI which will be reflected in our libdrm packages. Now that linux 2.6.34 is in experimental

Re: libdrm: Changes to 'ubuntu'

2010-05-22 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-14 22:16 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 21:16:03 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-05-14 20:27 +0200, Robert Hooker wrote: libdrm (2.4.20-2ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low - * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes: + * Merge from debian

libdrm: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2010-05-22 Thread Sven Joachim
| 35 ++-- 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) New commits: commit d0e14dd4d1eb18fab55dd9b372c7d2daada59503 Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Sat May 22 13:40:50 2010 +0200 debian/changelog entry for xsfbs update diff

libdrm: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2010-05-22 Thread Sven Joachim
Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Sat May 22 17:13:58 2010 +0200 Include full SONAME in libdrm-nouveau1.install diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 3c3882f..ee6125e 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ libdrm (2.4.20-3) UNRELEASED

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Changes to 'upstream-unstable'

2010-05-22 Thread Sven Joachim
New branch 'upstream-unstable' available with the following commits: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ofqt4-0005ls...@alioth.debian.org

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Changes to 'upstream-experimental'

2010-05-22 Thread Sven Joachim
Makefile.am |2 README.NV1 | 42 configure.ac| 49 man/nouveau.man | 27 src/Makefile.am | 40 src/drmmode_display.c | 850 ++-- src/nouveau_bios.h | 224 - src/nouveau_calc.c | 612 --- src/nouveau_class.h |

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2010-05-22 Thread Sven Joachim
src/nv_proto.h |2 19 files changed, 9273 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) New commits: commit 32959c388149a5b7cf60e8f5f70f6c8a71e7d0fd Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Sat May 22 14:38:52 2010 +0200 Require libdrm-dev 2.4.20-3~ for build

Bug#582995: xserver-xorg-video-nv: FTBFS: ../../compat/modes/xf86Cursors.c:40:28: error: xf86CursorPriv.h: No such file or directory

2010-05-25 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-25 09:25 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: tag 582995 unreproducible moreinfo kthxbye Your log has: checking for xf86Modes.h... no checking whether XSERVER_LIBPCIACCESS is declared... no configure: X server is missing new mode code and --with-xserver-source not specified, using

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2010-05-25 Thread Sven Joachim
debian/changelog |1 + debian/control |3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 43bb41998ce428613d56a045c315bd6103d26fb8 Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Wed May 26 06:57:25 2010 +0200 Add myself to Uploaders diff --git a/debian

Bug#583802: xdm: init script should support the status option

2010-05-30 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: xdm Version: 1:1.1.10-1 Severity: wishlist I just saw this during a libc6 upgrade: , | Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von libc6 2.10.2-9 (durch .../libc6_2.11.1-1_i386.deb) ... | Checking for services that may need to be restarted... | Checking init scripts... | Usage: /etc/init.d/xdm

Bug#583802: xdm: init script should support the status option

2010-06-01 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-30 20:12 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: Package: xdm Version: 1:1.1.10-1 Severity: wishlist I just saw this during a libc6 upgrade: , | Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von libc6 2.10.2-9 (durch .../libc6_2.11.1-1_i386.deb) ... | Checking for services that may need to be restarted

Bug#583802: xdm: init script should support the status option

2010-06-02 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-06-02 13:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 09:44:49 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: diff --git a/debian/xdm.init b/debian/xdm.init index 93fcb62..4127dff 100644 --- a/debian/xdm.init +++ b/debian/xdm.init @@ -113,8 +113,12 @@ case $1 in log_end_msg 0

xdm: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2010-06-02 Thread Sven Joachim
debian/changelog |5 + debian/control |2 +- debian/xdm.init |6 +- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit 914dc2060e9307eadf76875614c1f4e7e6ca24d0 Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Tue Jun 1 09:05:00 2010 +0200 xdm.init

Bug#559852: xinit: --tmpdir is not supported by Lenny's mktemp

2010-06-05 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-06-05 15:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 07:34:57 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: Quoting the Debian changelog: , | xinit (1.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low | | [ Julien Cristau ] | * 06_move_serverauthfile_into_tmp.diff: use mktemp --tmpdir to honour

xinit: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2010-06-05 Thread Sven Joachim
2477599fe9ff57303394a2f5ce33769016f55d05 Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Sat Jun 5 19:08:26 2010 +0200 debian/changelog entry for xsfbs update diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 0d23099..7e5afd5 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ xinit (1.2.0-2

Bug#585019: Wishlist: Support for nVidia G94 [GeForce 9600 GT] (NV50)

2010-06-08 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-06-08 15:00 +0200, oz wrote: since xserver-xorg-video-nv does not support dual-head with (Zotac) GeForce 9600GT, I hoped this situation would be better with xserver-xorg-video-nouveau. But nouveau not even supports single-head, It does. [drm] failed to load kernel module nouveau

Bug#585933: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: blender display broken

2010-06-15 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-06-15 01:32 +0200, jmtrivial wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Version: 1:0.0.16+git20100518+4b8f1a0-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Using nouveau driver from experimental under kde, a strange bug appears on blender. Inside the blender window, the display is shift down

Bug#585933: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: blender display broken

2010-06-15 Thread Sven Joachim
reassign 585933 libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental found 585933 7.8.1-2 thanks On 2010-06-15 16:40 +0200, jmtrivial wrote: Le mardi 15 juin 2010 16:19:23, Sven Joachim a écrit : Does it happen with software rendering as well (use LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 blender to try)? No, it does not happen

Bug#586085: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: segfault prevents X start

2010-06-16 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-06-16 11:31 +0200, James Cameron wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Version: 1:0.0.15+git20100329+7858345-4 Severity: important After an apt-get dist-upgrade just now, X fails to start, a manual invokation of X from text console reveals this error: Backtrace: 0: X

Re: [RFC] removing xserver-xorg-video-nv from squeeze

2010-07-12 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-07-12 21:09 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote: If nouveau set KMS by default, as the intel driver does, but did not *require* KMS, I would agree. But the last time I checked, using the nouveau driver *forces* KMS. I don't like that. I still use, and prefer, hardware text mode virtual

Re: [RFC] removing xserver-xorg-video-nv from squeeze

2010-07-13 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-07-13 04:31 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote: Second, I can't seem to get an 80-column virtual console with KMS. Yes, I can change the font size, but the traditional 80-column display doesn't seem to present itself. Maybe I just haven't tried hard enough. It's not possible with a

Bug#588927: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: cannot use a decent resolution

2010-07-18 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-07-13 21:28 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=L2.6.32-686+KMS ro root=UUID=cdeb20e6-e3dd-436d-8c03-9cb2e4b9229f video=1280x1024 Appending video=1280x1024 is necessary to get that mode on the console; 1024x768 is used by default. If remove /etc/X11/xorg.conf,

Bug#593784: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: fails to detect monitor resolution

2010-08-22 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-08-22 11:02 +0200, Ryo Furue wrote: Hi Julien, | Please attach your kernel and X logs (when booting with the latest | kernel and without xorg.conf). Sure. Thanks for your help. Your kern.log is not really helpful since it comes from a 2.6.26 kernel. Anyway, the problem seems to be

Bug#593784: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: fails to detect monitor resolution

2010-08-23 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-08-23 04:06 +0200, Ryo Furue wrote: | Anyway, the problem seems to be that your monitor does not supply EDID | data, in which case X will choose 1024x768 as a presumably safe fallback | resolution. See also #588927. Thank you for the info. But, reading that thread, I couldn't tell

Re: libdrm: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2010-08-24 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-08-24 21:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: New commits: commit 752295ba101d84b8e3e695621fa41ce9406104e1 Author: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Date: Tue Aug 24 19:32:36 2010 +0200 Drop 04_fix_nouveau_bo_new_tile_segfault.diff, applied upstream. This is actually only half

Re: libdrm: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2010-08-24 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-08-24 21:53 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 21:48:51 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-08-24 21:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: New commits: commit 752295ba101d84b8e3e695621fa41ce9406104e1 Author: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Date: Tue Aug 24 19

libdrm: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2010-08-24 Thread Sven Joachim
70a3a37650293fed3bced8cf4882ffb1f9b14d9b Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Tue Aug 24 22:17:31 2010 +0200 Restore 04_fix_nouveau_bo_new_tile_segfault.diff There is another code path which does no longer exist upstream, but is restored by 03_revert_abi_change.diff. diff --git a/debian/changelog

Re: libdrm: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2010-08-25 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-08-24 22:33 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-08-24 21:53 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 21:48:51 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: BTW, it is now possible to install the experimental xserver-xorg-video-nouveau together with sid's libdrm-nouveau1. :-/ Yeah, I know

libdrm: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2010-08-25 Thread Sven Joachim
changed, 59 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) New commits: commit 7649f7ab7bd2cfaf61b5d6901a2fe82b7128b9a0 Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Wed Aug 25 18:25:39 2010 +0200 Add lintian override for symbols-file-contains-debian-revision We actually need 2.4.21-1 as minimal version

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Changes to 'upstream-experimental'

2010-08-25 Thread Sven Joachim
src/drmmode_display.c | 20 src/nouveau_class.h | 1169 ++ src/nouveau_dri2.c| 12 src/nouveau_exa.c | 49 -- src/nouveau_xv.c | 21 src/nv04_exa.c|4 src/nv30_exa.c|2 src/nv40_exa.c|2

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Changes to 'pristine-tar'

2010-08-25 Thread Sven Joachim
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_0.0.16+git20100825+390f1c8.orig.tar.gz.delta |binary xserver-xorg-video-nouveau_0.0.16+git20100825+390f1c8.orig.tar.gz.id|1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+) New commits: commit 61cf9860c7354c2a9030d6f387b1d26742b60b38 Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2010-08-25 Thread Sven Joachim
| 20 src/nv_driver.c | 42 src/nv_type.h |1 18 files changed, 1362 insertions(+), 184 deletions(-) New commits: commit dc851af294bfc477c40cda0c0c5cc5fa0404e820 Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Wed Aug 25 18:47

Bug#595173: Apologies: Bug #595173

2010-09-02 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-09-01 21:54 +0200, henryb...@xobie.com wrote: Submitted the wrong email address: was not using my machine So which address should be used to contact you? Regards, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#595173: , update

2010-09-02 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-09-02 15:39 +0200, henryb...@fsfe.org wrote: Removed most of gnome and replaced it with xfce4 (initially I was planning to replace all of gnome with icewm simply to see what impact that would have) Oddly enough: - System froze as soon as she used to file a shortcut on the

Bug#595173: , update

2010-09-03 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-09-02 21:26 +0200, henryb...@fsfe.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 07:08:13PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: You could also use the nv driver after blacklisting the nouveau kernel module or booting with the nouveau.modeset=0 option. Can you point me to a webpage where I can follow

Bug#595447: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Bad graphics on GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go AGP

2010-09-04 Thread Sven Joachim
tags 595447 + moreinfo thanks On 2010-09-04 02:22 +0200, Rob Owens wrote: Graphics display on my Dell Latitude laptop makes it just about impossible to read anything. Blacklisting nouveau and using the nv driver makes things work. Please boot with nouveau enabled anyway and use reportbug -N

Bug#595447: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Bad graphics on GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go AGP

2010-09-06 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-09-04 16:31 +0200, Rob Owens wrote: Here are my logs w/ nouveau enabled. Hm, I don't see anything unusual in them. :-| Let me know if you need any additional info. You could do either of the following: - Try xserver-xorg-video-nouveau from experimental. This requires a newer

Bug#596012: some more info

2010-09-08 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-09-08 10:26 +0200, Rémi Letot wrote: I too have been hit by this. I use the radeon driver too, but others with intel cards have been hit (see 595973 and 595776). I've seen something like this on two machines with Intel and Nvidia cards, respectively. The trigger is compiz (or

Bug#595566: xserver-xorg-core: xorg drastic performance decrease after upgrade

2010-09-09 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-09-07 20:45 +0200, marco wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 2:1.7.7-4 Severity: important I have exactly the same bug as Andreas Berger in n° 595566 except this : - No problem with Iceweasel. - CPU usage hit 70% when moving gnome terminal. Gnome terminal background is

Bug#596064: xserver-xorg: /usr/bin/X hangs (CPU 100%) on nVidia Corporation GT218 [GeForce 310]

2010-09-10 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-09-10 17:43 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com writes: I finally got it ! :) Thanks, this confirms my suspicion: ioctl(9, 0x40086485, 0x7fffa426f020) = ? ERESTARTSYS (To be restarted) --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) @ 0 (0) --- rt_sigreturn(0xe) = -1

Bug#595447: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Bad graphics on GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go AGP

2010-09-10 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-09-10 19:25 +0200, Rob Owens wrote: I tried with xserver-xorg-video-nouveau from experimental, but I'm getting the same bug. (By the way, that package did not list a newer kernel as a dependency, but I installed one anyway per Sven's instructions). It is not possible to depend on

Bug#596832: base: crash on startup

2010-09-17 Thread Sven Joachim
reassign 596832 linux-2.6 thanks On 2010-09-14 15:05 +0200, Thomas van der Burgt wrote: Package: base Severity: important My laptop often crashes just after booting, the message given is shown in the attached picture: INIT: version 2.88 booting Using makefile-style concurrent boot in

Bug#598312: gdm crashes

2010-09-28 Thread Sven Joachim
reassign 598312 linux-2.6 reassign 596453 linux-2.6 found 596453 2.6.32-21 forcemerge 596453 598312 thanks On 2010-09-28 10:41 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Juha Mäkinen juha.maki...@koti.soon.fi (28/09/2010): after last update (28 september 2010) gdm crashes. trouble maybe with intel driver

Bug#579425: Still no dice, but a segfault instead

2010-09-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-13 02:15 +0200, Stefan Monnier wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Version: 1:0.0.15+git20100329+7858345-3 Severity: normal So I upgraded to 2.6.32-12 (after spending some time to finally understand it's named 2.6.32-5) as well as 2.6.33-experimentl4 (couldn't find the

libdrm: Changes to 'upstream-experimental'

2010-09-29 Thread Sven Joachim
configure.ac|2 include/drm/drm.h |4 include/drm/drm_mode.h |4 include/drm/i915_drm.h |4 include/drm/nouveau_drm.h |1 include/drm/radeon_drm.h|4 include/drm/vmwgfx_drm.h| 69 ++ intel/intel_bufmgr.h

libdrm: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2010-09-29 Thread Sven Joachim
| 30 xf86drmMode.c | 44 +++ 15 files changed, 588 insertions(+), 230 deletions(-) New commits: commit 55eca8de3790c3d67f6e05da3001c2aa0da5aca7 Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Wed Sep 29 08:59:48 2010 +0200 Bump changelogs diff --git a/ChangeLog b

xserver-xorg-video-intel: Changes to 'upstream-experimental'

2010-09-29 Thread Sven Joachim
.gitignore |1 NEWS | 61 configure.ac | 85 man/Makefile.am | 17 man/intel.man| 14 src/Makefile.am | 70 src/common.h | 237 --

xserver-xorg-video-intel: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2010-09-29 Thread Sven Joachim
insertions(+), 26340 deletions(-) New commits: commit bcaaaf77a75981aa1a456fe2ea1cba9b2904af42 Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Wed Sep 29 10:03:11 2010 +0200 Bump libdrm build-dependency to 2.4.22 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 0aa6c60..7937160 100644

xserver-xorg-video-intel: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2010-09-30 Thread Sven Joachim
: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Thu Sep 30 19:39:35 2010 +0200 New upstream release diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 58bc18f..954e305 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@ +commit 9f232ad67c72b7869dcd112207bc41dc01d7d104 +Author: Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org

Bug#598624: xserver-xorg-video-intel: 830M crashes with 'Failed to submit batchbuffer: Input/output error'

2010-10-01 Thread Sven Joachim
Am 01.10.2010 um 12:19 schrieb Alexander Heinlein: Another thing that bothers me with the new kernels is that I have to enable KMS to use the intel driver, but disable it if I want to use vesa (the current fallback for me). Changing the bootloader configuration and rebooting just to switch

Bug#598803: xserver-xorg-video-intel: X crashes / hung gpu, now and then

2010-10-02 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-10-02 18:31 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:07:51PM +0200, Cesare Leonardi wrote: Hello Steinar, can you tell us what's your chipset? 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2010-10-04 Thread Sven Joachim
debian/README.Debian | 22 ++ debian/changelog | 11 +++ debian/control |4 ++-- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) New commits: commit eb8ce3267b17cc99add0f6361f1dfc958492aecb Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Mon Oct 4 19

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2010-10-04 Thread Sven Joachim
debian/README.Debian |7 +++ debian/changelog |2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) New commits: commit aa84c618934dcf58eec567ac7d4bfd410e47df54 Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Date: Mon Oct 4 20:18:34 2010 +0200 Mention nv as incompatible

Bug#598819: Bug similar to 598819 reported in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau

2010-10-05 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-10-05 15:25 +0200, r.duc...@gmail.com wrote: The bug 598819 I reported is similar to the one reported in xserver-xorg- video-nouveau: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595173 You might want to redirect my report to xserver-xorg-video-nouveau, which seems more

Bug#598819: output of /usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg-core/script 31

2010-10-07 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-10-07 08:25 +0200, r ductor wrote: As was asked. Check out also the previous attachments that document the freezes, namely Xorg.0.log.old of message 10 and kdm_all of message 5. They tell that your GPU is locked up, but unfortunately it's next to impossible to know why that happens.

Bug#599719: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Graphical glitches on GTX 285

2010-10-11 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-10-10 14:49 +0200, Stephan Thamm wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Version: 1:0.0.16+git20100825+390f1c8-1 Severity: important I am using a GeForce GTX 285 and am getting graphical glitches since I switched from the proprietary nvidia to nouveau. They are appearing near

Bug#601936: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: slow during fullscreen videos on GeForce 8200

2010-10-31 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-10-31 09:11 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: When I am watching a video in fullscreen, I see many glitches, the system is less responsive to keyboard events, and mplayer takes 100% CPU. This happens with recorded videos as well as live captures (even when there is nothing to capture

Bug#601207: mesa: Mesa 7.9 requires libdrm-dev (= 2.4.22) and libxcb1-dev (= 1.6)

2010-10-31 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-10-30 23:55 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: While building the 32bit package I noticed that Mesa 7.9 dous not build with libdrm-dev 2.4.21 or libxcb1-dev 1.1-1.2 It works with the later versions available in debian which are 2.4.22 and 1.6 respectively. I doubt that libdrm 2.4.22 is

Bug#601936: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: slow during fullscreen videos on GeForce 8200

2010-10-31 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-10-31 19:20 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Le 31/10/2010 09:37, Sven Joachim a écrit : Which video output driver do you use in mplayer? [...] I don't know exactly. Attached is a sample mplayer output. Which shows that xv is being used, which is good in principle: VO: [xv] 512x384

Re: [pkg-nvidia-devel] X stack for squeeze

2010-03-17 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-03-17 09:37 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 04:23:11PM -0700, Randall Donald wrote: We generally go with the latest version at the time of freeze and then build a kernel module package that is compatible. Other than that is there something else you are asking about?

Bug#568168: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau needs nouveau bits from libdrm

2010-03-23 Thread Sven Joachim
block 568168 by 568162 thanks Now that the drm parts from 2.6.33 have been backported to the Debian 2.6.32 kernel, packaging xserver-xorg-video-nouveau seems to be desirable, but that needs a fixed libdrm which includes the nouveau parts. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#568168: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau needs nouveau bits from libdrm

2010-03-23 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-03-23 13:51 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 13:30:03 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: block 568168 by 568162 thanks Now that the drm parts from 2.6.33 have been backported to the Debian 2.6.32 kernel, packaging xserver-xorg-video-nouveau seems to be desirable

Bug#568162: patch for this bug

2010-03-23 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-03-23 21:39 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: I'd like to know which upstream commits are reverted by 03_revert_abi_change.diff. Do you by chance know that? Commit b496c63143e9a4ca02011582329bce2df99d9b7c and its successor are reverted by the patch. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#568168: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau needs nouveau bits from libdrm

2010-03-23 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-03-23 14:14 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 14:02:19 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: I had just begun to tackle that task, using the ubuntu branch from xserver-xorg-video-nouveau git as a starting point. Oh, cool. Thanks for doing this. I have some good news, since

Bug#568168: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau needs nouveau bits from libdrm

2010-03-25 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-03-24 02:53 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de (23/03/2010): I have some good news, since (after fixing #568162) I indeed managed to build a working package. At least X has been running for about two hours which is a promising start. :-) I'd like to echo

Bug#568168: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau needs nouveau bits from libdrm

2010-03-25 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-03-24 09:20 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 22:19:20 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: I'm not sure how to do the merge. While merging upstream-ubuntu into upstream-experimental is a trivial fast-forward, and merging upstream-experimental into debian-experimental

Bug#558788: add nouveau in squeeze, please

2010-03-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-03-28 00:23 +0100, Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi, there are a few problems which will probably prevent nouveau from being added to Squeeze: First, Squeeze is certainly going to be shipped with 2.6.32 since it is a kernel with long-term support from upstream. Since Debian puts a strong

Bug#568168: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau needs nouveau bits from libdrm

2010-03-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-03-28 16:36 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 16:17:00 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: The only remedy for that would be if the Debian kernel team could pull nouveau drm from 2.6.34 rather than 2.6.33. They are probably not going to do that, but I'd have a good

Bug#568168: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau needs nouveau bits from libdrm

2010-03-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-03-28 19:57 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 19:25:43 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 16:17:00 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: The only remedy for that would be if the Debian kernel team could pull nouveau drm from 2.6.34 rather than 2.6.33

Re: Packagaing nouveau firmware

2010-03-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-03-29 03:36 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 18:43 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: Followed by the text of the actual license. Since Nvidia does not distribute the files themselves and their license only allows redistribution of unmodified files, it seems

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >