Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Alias passing Junkmail

2002-09-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelisted in Declude Junkmail ... it is an alias that points within Imail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If it passes Declude Junkmail due to the whitelist, is it scanned a second time when Imail passes it along as an alias? No. The E-mail will only be scanned

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More encoded spam

2002-09-07 Thread Smart Business Lists
I started special trapping on messages with base 64 encoding ONLY in text/html mime segments late on 9/5. In slightly more than 2,000 total messages since then there has been one such message. It was spam. Why the message was encoded in base64 is just a mystery to me. The message failed most

[Declude.JunkMail] Is Declude working on email that is passing through a primary MX machine?

2002-09-07 Thread David Dodell
I have two servers ... my primary machine stat.com is running Imail with the Declude Junkmail / Virus installed on it. All incoming mail for my primary machine and secondary machine (idf.stat.com) comes to stat.com first ... (primary MX) ... I also am the primary MX for some domains that are

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Why scanned?

2002-09-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
Why is the email scanned when the following exists in the Global.cfg WHITELIST FROM @CHARITYCHANNEL.COM I thought the whitelist should be the e-Mail that is identified as: X-Declude-Sender The header follows: X-Declude-Sender: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.94.19.26] Yes,

[Declude.JunkMail] Why scanned?

2002-09-07 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message Hi; [Version 1.58 beta] Why is the email scanned when the following exists in the Global.cfg WHITELISTFROM@CHARITYCHANNEL.COM I thought the whitelist should be the e-Mail that is identified as: X-Declude-Sender The header follows: = X-SMTPExp-Version:

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Declude working on email that is passing through a primary MX machine?

2002-09-07 Thread David Dodell
But the email passing through to idf.stat.com and the off-site machines doesn't seem to be stopped? That's because IMail treats those domains as remote (outgoing E-mail), so the actions in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file will be used. To get around this, you can have per-domain settings

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Declude working on email that is passing through a primary MX machine?

2002-09-07 Thread David Dodell
That's because IMail treats those domains as remote (outgoing E-mail), so the actions in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file will be used. To get around this, you can have per-domain settings for those domains (so that mail to those domains won't be treated the same as outgoing mail).

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Declude working on email that ispassing through a primary MX machine?

2002-09-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have two servers ... my primary machine stat.com is running Imail with the Declude Junkmail / Virus installed on it. All incoming mail for my primary machine and secondary machine (idf.stat.com) comes to stat.com first ... (primary MX) ... I also am the primary MX for some domains that are

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Declude working on email that ispassing through a primary MX machine?

2002-09-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, another dumb question; Why are the actions for incoming email defined in $default$JunkMail but outgoing actions are defined in global.cfg? Because outgoing actions are global (not per-domain/per-user), and are rarely used. -Scott --- [This E-mail was

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain alias checking

2002-09-07 Thread Glen Harvy
Hi and thanks for your reply. DECLUDE VIRUS: As I have no control over how people address their mail then I presume I must (to be safe) include the domain alias. Similarly, if mail is addressed to an alias (either user or domain) then I need to specify four others. To summarise, if a user