Scott,
I have the comments test set up like this:
COMMENTScommentsweight x 0 0
As I understand it, this essentially counts the number of comments and adds
the total to the weight of the message. If I'm understanding this
correctly, then I think it isn't
I have the comments test set up like this:
COMMENTScommentsweight x 0 0
As I understand it, this essentially counts the number of comments and
adds the total to the weight of the message.
That is correct.
If I'm understanding this correctly, then I
I mean't to search for normal but uneccessary repeated html-tags like
font ...
This can trigger a lot of false positives not only in Frontpage composed
html.
The target is to remove them completely before search for keywords.
OK, I guess I am still not sure then how this test works.
Of
I have set this up as a way to prevent lost emails. I have a problem with
three different companies saying they are losing their emails. Will this
allow their emails to go through...regardless of what it is?
WHITELIST TODOMAIN pyramidhealthcare.com
WHITELIST TODOMAIN standardhardware.com
Jim
I have them entered differently and it works.
WHITELIST TO @pyramidhealthcare.com
Not sure if the other way works, but this does...
Sincerely,
Grant Griffith, Vice President
EI8HT LEGS Web Management Co., Inc.
http://www.getafreewebsite.com
877-483-3393
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Title: Message
Anyone know how
the heck to submit a removal for postfixgate? is there even a
way?
The link on their
website (www.postfixgate.com) is a js
popup,
which when I
pulled the js page it refers to
http://www.liswireless.net/postfixgate/dispute/default.htm
When you go
there, its
Title: Message
Their "join postfixgate" link goes to the same
place with absolutely no joining instructions.
-
- Original Message -
From:
Tom Baker |
Netsmith Inc
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:22
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Thanks , will set it up that way.
Jim Rooth
Klotron, Inc.
214.244.0979
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Anyone know how the heck to submit a removal for postfixgate? is there
even
a way?
The link on their website (www.postfixgate.com
http://www.postfixgate.com
) is a js popup,
which when I pulled the js page it refers to
http://www.liswireless.net/postfixgate/dispute/default.htm
I have them entered differently and it works.
WHITELIST TO @pyramidhealthcare.com
Not sure if the other way works, but this does...
This should NOT work. WHITELIST TO looks for an exact match.
WHITELIST TODOMAIN looks for a partial match, so WHITELIST TODOMAIN is
needed to whitelist all
hmmm, I thought it was working... Sorry, I will make the change to mine.
Thanks Scott
Sincerely,
Grant Griffith, Vice President
EI8HT LEGS Web Management Co., Inc.
http://www.getafreewebsite.com
877-483-3393
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Scott,
I seem to remember this coming up maybe a few months ago?
Hell I have a bad memory.
The first link in postfixgate says you shalt not be listed on any other spam
lists to be removed, and links to www.dnstuff.com
Maybe you guys could throw a note on http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch
Maybe you guys could throw a note on http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch
making note that its dead to help guys out like me that have no memory, or
people that don't have access to this mailing list to get help from others ?
We're going to remove it from the list.
If I have a filter like this:
BODY 5 CONTAINS links
And the body contains 5 links, will it count each time, or just once?
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
If I have a filter like this:
BODY 5 CONTAINS links
And the body contains 5 links, will it count each time, or just once?
It will only count it once. So an E-mail with a body of Here are some
links will be treated exactly the same as an E-mail with a body of Here
are some links to links.
It will only count it once. So an E-mail with a body of Here are some
links will be treated exactly the same as an E-mail with a body of Here
are some links to links.
I think it would be an added bonus if it could count each time, similar to
the new comments test.
Or could the comments test
Check out this article if you haven't already.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/29159.html
The link to the Newsgroup message thread for pro vs. con is worth a read,
and includes some gems.
The short of it is that spews.org often lists a much bigger netblock than
they need to, on the
Well,
Nah, they're incompetent, overzealous and irresponsible.
Did I say that out loud?
I feel like I did my part. Today we helped convinced another mid-sized
provider (http://www.OLM.com) to stop using spews completely. They
implemented spews on 02/03/03 and by 02/05/03 it was gone.
However,
So I am running the weight10 test, and doing a ROUTETO
to a mailbox called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have some legit messages in the box, that I need to get to the intended
users here at work.
How do I go about doing this, while trying to keep the header intact so that
the user
sees the msg as if it
I have an custom external test that gets passed the %NRECIPS% variable. The test is
never seeing a value for NRECIPS greater than 99. Is there something in the Declude
code limiting this value to 99?
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
20 matches
Mail list logo
