If you did not know
Cox the High Speed Internet provider of cable modems. Beginning Wednesday,
June 25 2003 has filter access to all 3rd party outgoing (SMTP) mail
servers.
What they did was to block port 25 that SMTP uses to send emails
Since I am on a cable modem at home I can no longer
To get around this on my email server on the T-1 I added the built-in SMTP
server that come with IIS and Windows 2000 but changed the default port
number from 25 to 26.
Now I have two SMTP servers on the same server Imail ver 8.0 and Declude
Junkmail and Virus using the standard ports so
Hi Scott,
Would it be possible to enhance the hold action with the ability to move
the message file to another folder that /spool/spam ?
I see more advantages with this function:
1.) We can move messages 200% of our hold weight directly to our
/spool/spam/hold folder without the need to review
Hello,
I was wondering if there was a subject contains type of test.
E.g. A message subject line contains Viagra, kinky, xxx, sex, etc. it will
fail the tests.
Is there something like this already? Thanks..
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Jeff,
Tuesday, July 1, 2003 you wrote:
JMH I was wondering if there was a subject contains type of test.
JMH E.g. A message subject line contains Viagra, kinky, xxx, sex, etc. it will
JMH fail the tests.
JMH Is there something like this already? Thanks..
That is filtering and it is
Ahh, ok.. Thanks..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smart Business
Lists
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 8:29 AM
To: Jeff Maze - Hostmaster
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Subject Contains test
Jeff,
Tuesday, July 1, 2003 you wrote:
JMH I
Would it be possible to enhance the hold action with the ability to move
the message file to another folder that /spool/spam ?
This is something that we definitely plan to add.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for
Scott,
I had someone point out that two addresses in my range (209.144.1.100,
209.144.1.14) are listed in ORDB, I went to DNSStuff.com and the lookup
tool said they were not, bud a direct query of ORDB shows them. I know
the l;istings are old, from 2001, and neither IP is in use for mail, so
I
Cox ( as well as most ISPs) only block specific ports as needed, and allow
everything else. ( vs a corporate organization or ISP servers which block
all, and allow whats needed ).
To the best of my knowledge cox only blocks
Out: 25
In: 25,80
The cox filters only apply to Residential customers,
(1)no SPAM or Anti-Virus checking
How does using a different SMTP server effect your inbound spam filtering?
Cox subscribers are forced to use the cox SMTP so what?
The only way this should effect your declude is that auto-whitelist may not
work.
If you still want to scan on the senders IP,
Our Imail version 8.0 with hot fix 1 is holding email with embedded web
pages, but only those that are sent from legitimate sources. All the SPAM
web pages get through. The email being held up passes all SPAM testing and
virus testing according to the Declude logs. It just doesn't get delivered.
I had someone point out that two addresses in my range (209.144.1.100,
209.144.1.14) are listed in ORDB, I went to DNSStuff.com and the lookup
tool said they were not, bud a direct query of ORDB shows them. I know
the l;istings are old, from 2001, and neither IP is in use for mail, so
I
correct they are blocking port 25 in and out but not port 26, you could also
use port 2525 for example
Sincerely,
William J. Baumbach II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
9975 Pennsylvania Ave. Manassas, Va. 20110-2028
Ph: 703-367-7900 ext:1708 Fax: 703-691-0946
I am running the VB script from this list tu purge all held messages after
14days. I guess I could make it part of the app instead of using the vb
script.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Webmaster
Sent: Tuesday, July 01,
Hello, All,
We've been using IMail server in-house for a couple of years now. We are in
the process of migrating our set of POP3 e-mail boxes over to Exchange 2000
but we would still like to take advantage of Declude's Virus and Spam
Filtering.
If we setup our mail to relay through IMail via
Your app would be a great tool to transfer the review work away from the
admins.
At the moment we already send out a virus vulnerability warning
containing a link to requeue the message. This works great for us.
But I'll see a problem with the ratio between false positives and spam
in the
This will stop me from finding what is obvious to the user and not me as the
admin. I have looked over messages I have thought were spam ant the user
calls a day or two later looking for a message from a customer. I do not
know who al of our customers are and all of their email addresses. But the
We've been using IMail server in-house for a couple of years now. We are in
the process of migrating our set of POP3 e-mail boxes over to Exchange 2000
but we would still like to take advantage of Declude's Virus and Spam
Filtering.
If we setup our mail to relay through IMail via Store and
Hi, Scott,
Thanks for responding.
We've been using IMail server in-house for a couple of years now. We are
in
the process of migrating our set of POP3 e-mail boxes over to Exchange
2000
but we would still like to take advantage of Declude's Virus and Spam
Filtering.
If we setup our mail
There is a way you can get your imail/declude-exchange-relay box to treat
the mail as inbound mail, but there is more administrative overhead (ie
not a good choice for most people).
Our organization does not make changes to our exchange mailbox's often so
this works great for us, and has the
Why did this one not get caught by the spam domains test. What would I need
in my sd.txt file to catch items like these.
These are the lines in my sd.txt that contain verizon.net
bellatlantic.netverizon.net
gte.net verizon.net
verizon.net .bellatlantic.
Kevin Bilbee
Why would you expect this line in your SD file to flag this message? The
X-Declude-Sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED] SD looks at the X-Declude-Sender
domain and does are RDNS query on it to see if the response has a matching
domain, or one that is listed as an alternative on the same line in your SD
Oops, I mean that Declude looks at the sender domain and if listed in your
SD file, then does an RDNS on the connecting IP (following your HOP and
IPBYPASS rules) to see if it responds with a matching domain entry, or
alternative domain entry, if one is listed in your SD file.
Bill
- Original
I did not expect it to be caught. I was woundering why it was not caught.
Whith your explanation I think I have a better understanding of how spam
domains works.
So you are saying that if I have the following line
gmx.at
the message would have failed spam doamins? But if I say have the
So you are saying that if I have the following line
gmx.at
the message would have failed spam doamins? But if I say have the
following
line
gmx.at verizon.net
it would have passed spam domains and also no entry would pass all mail
from
sender gmx.at.
Correct, the SD filter only
Why did this one not get caught by the spam domains test. What would I need
in my sd.txt file to catch items like these.
These are the lines in my sd.txt that contain verizon.net
bellatlantic.netverizon.net
gte.net verizon.net
verizon.net .bellatlantic.
The catch here
I am going to implement an app I have almost completed. The app will work
like this.
1) Read the files in the hold folder for the previous day
2) Sort the email by recipient
3) Send the recipient an email containing the subject,
from address, tests it was held on, and a http link to recover
27 matches
Mail list logo
