Hi,
I realize that a lot of e-mail goes to the spam folder that is addressed to
non-existent (or not-anymore-existent) addresses. Is there any reason, why
Declude does not check the recipient's name before doing other tests?
Wouldn't it be better to return e-mail to non exiistent addresses
I realize that a lot of e-mail goes to the spam folder that is addressed
to
non-existent (or not-anymore-existent) addresses. Is there any reason, why
Declude does not check the recipient's name before doing other tests?
Wouldn't it be better to return e-mail to non exiistent addresses instead
Actually, it would be better to setup IMail not to receive mail for
non-existent e-mail addresses. In fact, that is the default. IMail will
only accept e-mail for non-existent e-mail addresses if you have setup a
nobody alias within your domains. I would suggest removing the nobody
aliases if
I don't have a nobody alias set up. It seems to me that Declude takes the
incoming mail and does the tests (spam, virus) before putting it into the
inbox. If somebody writes to a non-existent mail that fails the test with a
weight that is set to HOLD, it will be stored in the spam folder instead
I don't have a nobody alias set up.
If you don't have a nobody alias set up, IMail will reject E-mail to
non-existent accounts, so the E-mail shouldn't be delivered. However:
It seems to me that Declude takes the
incoming mail and does the tests (spam, virus) before putting it into the
inbox.
OSSRC is still in GLOBAL.CFG but it has been commented
out and moved
to the Not Commonly Used section. Does anyone know why
this was
changed? It also still seems to be a valid test and it's
not a pay
service so I don't understand the move.
The reason for that is that
Given that OSSRC and OSSOFT are no longer effective, besides EASYNET-DNSBL and
SPAMCOP, what are others giving good Weight to, thanks for the info.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 8/1/2003 5:01 PM
To:
Scott,
This has probably been mentioned but I just heard about it. The
SUBJECTSPACES test, is it an undocumented test? Will it check spaced all in
a row, ie: This MessageHere and the spaces between or does it also
count the space between words.
Jeff Kratka
Jeff, this test adds all spaces found in the subject together (including
single spaces between words), not just contiguous spaces.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Kratka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
This has probably been mentioned but I just heard about it. The
SUBJECTSPACES test, is it an undocumented test?
It's currently undocumented, but is part of what we are adding to the
documentation for 1.75.
Will it check spaced all in a row, ie: This MessageHere and the
spaces between
Ditto
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russ Uhte
(Lists)
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Report System
If you would like to try it out let me know and I will
What would be the best way to delete all messages that contain an attachment using Pro?
Thanks,
Paul Navarre
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
JunkMail is not really geared to do this. However, if you are running
Declude virus, you can use the BANEXT feature to quarantine e-mail messages
that contain defined attachment extensions. I don't know if the BANEXT
feature supports a wildcard entry that will let you ban all e-mail messages
Everyone,
We have decided to close the Trustic service. As has become apparent
recently, there are several issues with the system as it is designed. As
such, we do not believe Trustic will reach the level of accuracy that we
require. The issue of handling large ISPs that, for the most part,
14 matches
Mail list logo
