[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed

2004-01-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi Due to the nature of our business (online retail), we get some e-mail that triggers most content driven spam tests (alligate, nolegitmatecontent, and sniffer). But, we NEED that e-mail. We receive one frequent type of e-mail from a company that doesn't have its act together, so I need to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed

2004-01-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
I can't tell if they actually control that IP. If they did, I guess I could. -- -Would adding 66.207.130.10 into your host antispam trusted ip addresses work? ~Rick Due to the nature of our business (online retail), we get some e-mail that triggers most content driven spam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed

2004-01-17 Thread Rick Klinge
Well I do see what you mean. This is interesting.. Doing a mail test via http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/[EMAIL PROTECTED] shows two different mail servers in anyway. HTH, ~Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed

2004-01-17 Thread Pete McNeil
We (SortMonster) can easily create custom white rules for this specific message as part of our normal subscription policy. Please let us know if that's what you'd like to do. Another thing also is that you could code such a rule to an alternate symbol (such as 10 for example) and have Declude

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed

2004-01-17 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Why not setup a filter and negative weight the helo string for beefree.com. Use enough negative weight to deliver the mail. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 7:22 AM To:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A question for you power grepers -

2004-01-17 Thread nick
Thank you Thank you Thank you! Very helpful. Thanks for the effort. -Nick Hayer -- Original Message -- From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:13:10 -0800 Nick, this is not possible with a single-line

[Declude.JunkMail] Update on SpamCop FP'ing on AOL

2004-01-17 Thread Matt
One of SpamCop's deputies replied to my message about them listing several of AOL's mail servers for the better part of last week. The gist of the reply was that there wasn't a bug, and these servers are listed because they have been witnessed sending spam (though in very low volumes as I had

[Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDSENDER, spam hit on Virtumundo

2004-01-17 Thread Matt
This one came from a well known spam house, Virtumundo. I'll report it in just a moment, however, BONDEDSENDER is now being dropped from my system (I've been expecting this to happen). http://www.senderbase.org/search?searchString=216.21.208.78 Looks like it might be a good idea to list the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDSENDER, spam hit on Virtumundo

2004-01-17 Thread Orin Wells
Forgive me if this has been addressed before, but I would like to hear from Cyan what the policy and procedures are for de-listing a Bonded Sender when it is apparent they have disseminated spam. If I were running the show I would not only de-list them immediately, but I would bar the company