RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Word of Mouth connection?

2004-02-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I consider it spam! I have had a couple of conversations with them. IMHO, the so called notices that some one is looking into you is nothing more than a marketing attempt to get you to sign up and pay money. There is absolutely no way you can find out if it is true that some one is looking you

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Strange message not marked as SPAM:

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
Hmmm...Where does the problem lie, Declude or IMail? Has it been fixed in post-1.75 Declude or post-8.01 IMail? These account for about half of the 6% of spam that slips through my current weighting. The rest I don't currently have tests for, but fixing this alone would improve my results

[Declude.JunkMail] virus tester

2004-02-02 Thread Terry Fritts
The virus tester is asking for a log on at the web site. Is there one or is this a mistake? If there is one how do we get it? Terry Fritts --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] virus tester

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
The virus tester is asking for a log on at the web site. Is there one or is this a mistake? If there is one how do we get it? Our web hosting company accidentally set up all PHP files to require a password (we don't even know the password!). We expect that it should be fixed shortly.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Word of Mouth connection?

2004-02-02 Thread Timm Jasper
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: I consider it spam! I have had a couple of conversations with them. IMHO, the so called notices that some one is looking into you is nothing more than a marketing attempt to get you to sign up and pay money. There is absolutely no way you can find out if it is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about MAILBOX action.

2004-02-02 Thread Charles Frolick
I don't use the MAILBOX action at all, I write a filterable header and use Imail filters to sort mail. Means it will work even on forwarded accounts to other servers or in clients with header filtering capabilities. Also, since I classify spam rank, you can take different actions based on rank,

[Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread Matt
I have a client that we switched over to our service last Thursday. The mail server is located at mail.domain.tld (according to the A record), but their MX records on their authoritative DNS server both point to us. Unfortunately, they are still receiving E-mail directed at their server

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
One thing they could do, is restrict incoming e-mail by IP address to only your server IP. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, February 02,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a client that we switched over to our service last Thursday. The mail server is located at mail.domain.tld (according to the A record), but their MX records on their authoritative DNS server both point to us. Unfortunately, they are still receiving E-mail directed at their server

[Declude.JunkMail] Truth in advertising?

2004-02-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Fortunately, the site is not reachable. Hello, Thank you for registration on our board - http://www.carderportal.o= rg Welcome to our underground Site! http://www.carderportal.org In our site you will find: Spam Hosting - from 20$ per

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread Matt
Here's their SOA query results: nameserver = NS85.WORLDNIC.com. mailaddress = namehost.WORLDNIC.com. serial = 2004013002, refresh = 10800, retry = 3600, expire = 604800, minimum = 7200. I'm thinking that what this says is that it will take up to 7 days for the records to expire. It

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
Here's their SOA query results: nameserver = NS85.WORLDNIC.com. mailaddress = namehost.WORLDNIC.com. serial = 2004013002, refresh = 10800, retry = 3600, expire = 604800, minimum = 7200. I'm thinking that what this says is that it will take up to 7 days for the records to expire.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread Matt
That's not possible under the client's current setup. I can remove the mail.domain.tld address in this case, however for clients that have SMTP AUTH and remote users, a change of this sort, or a change of the sub-domain would cause them to have to change their mail client configurations, and I

[Declude.JunkMail] False spam - spam database

2004-02-02 Thread Bridges, Samantha
Hello. Seems that mail from delphi.com is not being delivered. I Whitelisted @delphi.com and received the message fine. Therefore, I assume that Declude is blocking it. I looked the address up on www.dnsstuff.com and saw that it was listed under 3 spam databases. CSMA CSMA-SBL INTRUDERS I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] False spam - spam database

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
Seems that mail from delphi.com is not being delivered. I Whitelisted @delphi.com and received the message fine. Therefore, I assume that Declude is blocking it. I looked the address up on www.dnsstuff.com and saw that it was listed under 3 spam databases. That means that their IP is listed in

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] False spam - spam database

2004-02-02 Thread Bridges, Samantha
If I whitelisted it, will the logs still show which tests it failed? -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 2:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] False spam - spam database Seems that mail from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] False spam - spam database

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
If I whitelisted it, will the logs still show which tests it failed? Yes. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver vulnerability

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation

2004-02-02 Thread Dave Doherty
I use BulkRegister.com. Nice interface, easy login, $12/year. -Dave - Original Message - From: Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 1:05 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation Anyone using a registrar that they

[Declude.JunkMail] Any sort of Challenge Response tool for Declude/Imail??

2004-02-02 Thread ITG Lists
Hi all, RANT We got hammered today with failed delivery messages, as most of our email addresses were set as reply-to in a ton of spam :-( On top of that I have clients complaining about the continuing flood of ads dealing with those pills for men (name omitted for obvious reasons). It sure

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any sort of Challenge Response tool for Declude/Imail??

2004-02-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Search the archives for Challenge Response. It was just discussed last week. (Maybe on the virus list.) Do not use it! John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ITG

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Any sort of Challenge Response tool for Declude/Imail??

2004-02-02 Thread Matt
Challenge/Response has been covered at length twice recently on this list, and the almost universal informed opinion is that the shortcomings ruin it's applicability to a general E-mail environment. Aside from that, there is no doubt that you could be better handling the bounce messages as

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any sort of Challenge Response tool for Declude/Imail??

2004-02-02 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi George, is there any type of Challenge Response tools available for Imail that you are aware of Unfortunately - not. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send