Re: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels

2004-11-07 Thread Bill Landry
Andrew, thanks for sharing your scripts, however, I would bet that few list member will actually see them. Log entries: == 11/07/2004 01:00:46 Qe43e56af00464c1b MIME file: Scripts.zip [base64; Length=5925 Checksum=655492] 11/07/2004 01:00:46 Qe43e56af00464c1b Banning .ZIP file with cmd

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Suggestion: Most stringent test

2004-11-07 Thread Rick Davidson
Try this in your global config file, it will cause an email to be unwhitelisted and go through the testing process BYPASSWHITELIST bypasswhitelist x y 0 0 where x is the weight you want to assign where y is the amount of recipients required to skip the whitelist no setting is required in

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Maps of Spam, Viruses, and Dictionary harvest attacks.

2004-11-07 Thread Mark E. Smith
Interesting maps by Postini that illuminate the geographical origins of spam, viruses and directory harvest attacks. Map shortcuts: Spam http://postini.com/stats/world-spam-2048.jpg Viruses http://postini.com/stats/world-virus-2048.jpg Directory harvest attacks

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Maps of Spam, Viruses, and Dictionary harvest attacks.

2004-11-07 Thread Markus Gufler
Wow! Practically no viruses from Europe?! Can't be true. For my understanding the geolocation for spam and dictionary attacks in middle europe is not very exact as several cities like Milano (Italy), Frankfurt and Hamburg (Germany) are missing completely and I can't believe they have better or

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Maps of Spam, Viruses, and Dictionary harvest attacks.

2004-11-07 Thread Mark E. Smith
Also, it could be that their ARIN IP numbers are off. For example, UUNet might be servicing WANs in one country with IP allotments from another... Not sure if that's possibly but it could be. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Maps of Spam, Viruses, and Dictionary harvest attacks.

2004-11-07 Thread Dave Doherty
...South America, also, and most of Asia, as well. I think this just shows that the virus generators are sophisticated enough to cover their tracks well by using zombies in the US. -d - Original Message - From: Mark E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday,

[Declude.JunkMail] Latest Spam Tests

2004-11-07 Thread Glen Harvy
Hi, I'm about to review/update my spam tests which currently are: BASE64 WARN CBL WARN COMMENTS WARN DSBL WARN MYFILTERS WARN X-Warning: This E-mail failed Spam filters ORDB WARN REYNOLDSRSMT WARN SORBS-NOMAIL WARN SORBS-SMTP WARN SORBS-SPAM WARN SPAMCOP WARN DSN WARN NOABUSE WARN NOPOSTMASTER

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest Spam Tests

2004-11-07 Thread Pete McNeil
I highly recommend you review this site as part of your planning: http://www2.spamchk.com/public.html _M On Monday, November 8, 2004, 12:07:25 AM, Glen wrote: GH Hi, GH I'm about to review/update my spam tests which currently are: GH BASE64 WARN GH CBL WARN GH COMMENTS WARN GH DSBL WARN GH

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest Spam Tests

2004-11-07 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Well, Glen, there's a LOT more that you could be doing. I see that you've only put forward the names of built-in tests and IP4R tests. Do you have Declude Junkmail Lite, Standard or Pro? And have you upgraded to the current version of the declude.exe application? The manual is here: