Declude Support,
I need a little help. I have many of these emails that
just fail one test like CMDSPACE. I have a 8 weight to CMDSPACE and you
will see that the first header weighted at 8 and the second at 3 and they
failed the same tests. My biggest problem is I cant find a way for
Your just getting them ahead of the spam tests. I
see 84.98.46.191 is listed now by CBL, UCEPROTECT, SPAMCOP...
Maybe some content filter would have helped
here.
- Original Message -
From:
Kyle Fisher
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 15,
Is it posiable to have includes file in your
$default$.JunkMail? kinda like the WHITELISTFILE.
Thanks
-Seth
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an
Sorry for the OT but...
It seems we have a lot of goofing off during the work day around here!
Therefore, I am looking for recommendations for software (or hardware) based
solutions for internet monitoring/filtering in a corporate setting of less
than 150 users. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
I suggest Management by Walking Around.
Software isn't the solution. People can goof off in all kinds of ways,
not just from IM, email, or websurfing.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
Childers
Sent: Tuesday, February
Websense... Although its a bit expensive...
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and
We use a Watchguard firewall on our corporate network.
http://www.watchguard.com
You can use it to log all web browsing activities and there is a web filtering
service called web blocker that it uses to block sites based on content. I
believe that it uses surf controls databases for the
Therefore, I am looking for recommendations for software (or
hardware) based solutions for internet monitoring/filtering in a
corporate setting of less than 150 users. Any suggestions?
I find WebSense quite reasonably priced, endlessly flexible, and
stable. Cannot say the
We use SmartFilter by Secure Computing in integerates with our pix firewall.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Patrick Childers
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 11:00 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
We use a Watchguard firewall on our corporate
network. http://www.watchguard.com
FYI, if you use a Watchguard Firebox, make absolutely sure that the DNS
Proxy is *disabled*. There's a serious bug that they have been ignoring
for over a year now that makes it useless when multiple requests
Websense here. We had a year-long project last year to try and find a
replacement for Websense, cause management didn't like the price. After
a year of testing everything under the sun, we came back to Websense as
the best of the breed. The licensing costs are not even that expensive
when you
I suggest Management by Walking Around.
Software isn't the solution. People can goof off in all kinds
of ways, not just from IM, email, or websurfing.
Andrew 8)
I'll leave the walking around to the project managers. I only have to worry
about IM, email and websurfing. ;-)
Thanks for the
www.astaro.com has a fantastic solution, firewall, IPS, Content filtering,
transparent DNS, HTTP and SMTP proxies, anti-virus and anti-spyware for the
HTTP SMTP streams.
some of the features are ala carte and can get pricy but it is one very nice
all in one solution
Rick Davidson
National
Hi,
sonicwall can do that also
Thanks,
Andrew Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Tuesday, February 15, 2005, 3:02:34 PM, you wrote:
www.astaro.com has a fantastic solution, firewall, IPS, Content filtering,
transparent DNS, HTTP and SMTP proxies, anti-virus
If these are machines that the company owns and you can install them...
I have some Reg Keys that a guy who works under me wrote for windows XP that
blocks AOL-IM download and some others. It also prevents certain selected
sites from being accessed and prevents things like my bargain buddy from
I am currently evaluating some of the products from Fortinet (
www.fortinet.com ) and I am pretty impressed.
In addition to web blocking, it also does AV, IDS, and also can block
grayware.
I am now using the Watchguard product, but find the web blocker very
limiting because of thhe fact that
Hi Barry/Scott,
I'd like to request some separated variables.
Namely, splitting %ALLRECIPS% into %TORECIPS%, %CCRECIPS%, and
%BCCRECIPS%. I come to an occasion where I need to add the TO and CC
recips to the headers, but don't want to reveal BCC.
Thanks for considering it.
Darin.
I just wanted to check here and make sure that I am not messing
something up. Prior to switching to separate MTA's for handling our
gatewayed domains instead of having things delivered directly to IMail,
I had to enter an IP of the gatewayed domain in the Relay for
Addresses part of the SMTP
Hi Matt:
Not certain that I understand your question correctly.
The reason why you have the HOSTS entry would be to override the DNS.
Normally, DNS would point to your Imail server (or now, to your inbound
gateway). If Imail were to try to deliver the mail, it would use DNS to
look up the MX -
I do a ton of gateway E-mail scanning using the HOSTS file and I was
also entering the IP's in the Relay for Addresses screen. Formerly
E-mail wouldn't be relayed unless it was in Relay for Addresses, but
since a change to using MS SMTP for my MX gateways, and then having
those gateways
20 matches
Mail list logo
