I don't know if it's something new. Today I've seen the attached spam
message using table cells to split up suspicious keywords but keep them
still readable in the html view.
I think it's not a realy big problem as it's still a spam message containing
a link. The URIBLs should catch them soon.
Title: Message
Last Friday I finally upgraded from
1.81 to 2.0.6. We use Declude Pro
Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus. On Friday
after the install Imail web messaging crashed several times. We let the problem go until Monday. On Monday the problems got worse with
numerous crashes of web
I upgraded my organization to ICS a few months back and we couldn't be
happier. We went with the non-Symantec version as we're presently
running Declude Virus. Trend Micro's product isn't bad at all either
(it's kinda like Symantec used to be before they started charging users
through the
Title: Message
I haven't upgraded jet to v2 but can see the same problems
with imail since installed win2003 SP1
Haven't seen any crash since removing SP1 but this is not
100% sure at the moment.I will report it later this
week.
Markus
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I saw this a while ago with the medication spam that had subject lines
like
xx-99 Medication
where xx was two letters and 99 two numbers.
It was a big problem for me. It also had a URL in it so I was able to
trap on that.
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
-Original
Title: Message
We just put SP1 on this morning but have
not had a crash since we went back to 1.81 on Declude.
Thanks,
Scott
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gufler Markus
Sent: Tuesday, April
19, 2005 8:31 AM
To:
Title: Message
I'll
add our point too. We also are crashing with 2.0.6 (also SP1
installed). We've put back 1.82 into production. No
issues.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of scott_pownerSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 4:35
Title: Message
iwegmsg has big stability issues, especially when the server is under
heavy load. I noted an increase in CPU utilization after going to SP1,
but I'm leaning towards that being related to volume and not the SP at
the moment. iwebmsg is so unstable that you can crash any server by
Title: Message
I don't know if this is of any help here, but two new SP1 features that
I don't understand and I fear to some extent are the "Application
Experience Lookup Service" and "Data Execution Prevention (DEP)". It
seems like both might represent overhead to things like Declude which
Title: Message
DEP can be configured under Control panel system
advanced performance
select the new third tab.
It's my new top for "idiotic placementsin a GUI
configuration"
Markus
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Tuesday, April
I've noticed this issue and wanted to pass it by the list.
Occasionally the mail server will get a piece of mail that
has been processed and given a weight that would send it
to the SPAM folder. Instead of sending it to the SPAM folder,
the mail-to address is appended with a -SPAM. This is
added
Title: Message
Nothing about the service that SP1 installs, but I did I find multiple
pages on Microsoft's site about "Application and User Experience", which seems
to be their quality and regresssion testing. They indicate that 3rd party
vendors should follow:
Would someone direct me to some instructions to begin using SpamAssassin
with Declude?
Thank you very much.
Will
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be
Would someone direct me to some instructions to begin using SpamAssassin
with Declude?
See my sig and the archives.
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19 Apr 2005 at 14:32, Will wrote:
On 19 Apr 2005 at 14:32, Will wrote:
Hi Will -
Would someone direct me to some instructions to begin using
SpamAssassin with Declude?
Here you go - Sandy's script works fine:
http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release/
Do you recommend using SpamAssassin with Declude?
Will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 1:48 PM
To: Will
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin Plugin for Declude
Would someone direct
On 19 Apr 2005 at 15:08, Will wrote:
Do you recommend using SpamAssassin with Declude?
No question. I really like it - but bottom line is it is just
another test - but matched w/combo filters it really helps me with my
setup.
-Nick
Will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Title: Message
Sorry about not getting back to anyone
some malcontent set up a winmx server in my network! Anyway the bottom line right now is:
Declude
1.81 - No problems for about a million years
Declude
2.0.6
Thought this was interesting...
ISPs are finally taking some responsibility for the amount of
spam we all get. Both
Earthlink and AOL are beginning to implement procedures that will require
users to use a password when they send emails, in an effort to cut down on the
use by
19 matches
Mail list logo
