That is easy. The CBL failure is set to go to the user Spam
mailbox. I just reviewed mine (spam box) and found 251
e-mails there for the past 30 days. Every one of them was
spam.
Ok Orin, so you're using the SUBJECT action with CBL?
I'm sorry to belabour it if you already know this,
Title: Message
I did !!
But there's inconsistence between MMC and registry,
The MMC is checked, but the Registry key isn't there.
So I added this key.
Let's see in some hours.
Regards
Andres.-
Colbeck, Andrew escribi:
Andres, have you checked out:
OOOPPPSSS !!!
So, after deleting it, same as before
:((
Andres.-
Darin Cox escribi:
Message
If you read the article, In windows
2000 SP3 and later the registry key is only used to turn OFF the
setting. By default it is on and there is no registry key.
Darin.
Title: Message
Thank you very much. I had not yet
tried this, so I have now re-enabled Declude Junkmail and Im taking it
for another test run today. I also switched to F-prot last Friday and
have Imail and Declude now pointed to my local DNS on the same server.
Heres hoping for the
Title: Message
These figures are pulled from the Imail
daily report.
Without Declude Junkmail this month:
SpamContent 12272
SpamPhrase 16150
SpamFeatures 831
SpamUrlDomain 31755
LocalDeliver 90728
RemoteDeliver 12614
With Declude Junkmail in December:
SpamContent 21384
Title: Message
These figures are pulled from the Imail
daily report.
Without Declude Junkmail this month:
SpamContent 12272
SpamPhrase 16150
SpamFeatures 831
SpamUrlDomain 31755
LocalDeliver 90728
RemoteDeliver 12614
With Declude Junkmail in December:
SpamContent 21384
Title: Message
Hello,
why do you have the Spam* counts?? I had them once, now
they are gone. Don't know why/when.
Any Idea?
Alex
From: Will [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:14 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
I've hit the research trail all morning and I'm unable to either find the
correct phrase, the process is obscure or my morning Coffee hasn't reached
my brain probably the later.
We have an issue where the email client is attaching a X-Header we want to
remove. While I view this as a minor
Ouch... only way I know of is to rewrite the message. So you would need an
app that reads the D*.SMD file, removed the appropriate X-Header line, and
rewrites the file. It would be in the process chain along with IMail and
Declude.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Cahill
Declude nor IMail has this capability out of the box.
I'm not sure if Declude locks the D*.SMD file, but if it doesn't, you
could write some VBScript and call it as an external test from within
Declude and have it rewrite the D*.SMD file when it finds the header
that you want to remove.
The destination client is a Financial Organization who handles our
electronic billing. They are complaining that the X-Mailer: header is
causing a routing issue with their automation software and want us to
remove it.
Since they have the perception of control, they submit our billing and we
Title: Message
Darin, Andrew.
Ok, I know the harmless of the action, but ...
anyway, the dns.exe version is 5.0.2195.6715, Jun 19, 2003. Windows
2000 SP4.
Maybe 2003 should be the 'solution'.
Regards
Andres.-
Darin Cox escribi:
The point was that he did not need
to add the key.
Chuck,
I figured as much considering the request. If it counts for anything,
unless your X-Mailer header is malformed, then it is the fault of the
automation software.
I was also wondering however what E-mail client was inserting this
header, and what it looks like if you have an example.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Cahill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The destination client is a Financial Organization who handles our
electronic billing. They are complaining that the X-Mailer: header is
causing a routing issue with their automation software and want us to
remove it.
Chuck,
One
of my domains is having trouble sending email to HotMail. I have a reverse
record and spf record setup for the offending domain. Do you guys know what HotMails
requirements are of if they have a test page available like AOLs?
Thanks,
Evans
Martin
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=martek.net
Fix all of your problems.
Your Nameservers aren't working.
At 01:24 PM 8/3/2005 -0500, you wrote:
One of my domains is having trouble sending email to HotMail. I have a reverse record and spf record setup for the offending
Strange. Im showing all pass
on dnsreport.com. Ill keep troubleshooting.
Thanks,
Evans Martin
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ncl Admin
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005
1:40 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
ns2.martek.net isn't responding appropriately. I get "recvfrom error
10054" when querying it directly for your MX records.
Matt
Evans Martin wrote:
Strange.
Im showing all pass
on dnsreport.com. Ill keep troubleshooting.
Thanks,
Evans Martin
From:
We have been seeing this since last week. Two
out of the four ip addresses listed for each MX host for hotmail do not respond.
I have tried pinging and telnet to port 25 by ip addresses.
See what ip is cached for hotmail for you and
try to telnet by some of the other ip address.
Rick
Thank you.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Baranowski
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005
3:17 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
OT: Trouble with HotMail
We have been seeing this since last week.
Two out
20 matches
Mail list logo
