RE: [Declude.JunkMail] chronic junkmail -- new account

2005-10-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Interesting thought. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 5:45 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] chronic junkmail -- new

[Declude.JunkMail] 3.05.5 TempLog/Concatanate Log issues

2005-10-10 Thread Mark Smith
Any word from Declude on the issue in 3.05.5 that fills up the /templogs folder? To recap, if Concatenate logs is turned on AND the decludeproc service crashes, declude "forgets" about the temp. logs. (Concatenate Log Threshold is reset to 0). This results in the /templog eventually

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 3.05.5 TempLog/Concatanate Log issues

2005-10-10 Thread David Barker
Mark, I am following up with Bill and will post as soon as I have an answer. David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark SmithSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:43 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] 3.05.5

[Declude.JunkMail] DomainKeys

2005-10-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Good, bad, indifferent? Now that 3.0.5.5 is out and stable, any thoughts of including a test for DomainKeys into Declude? John T eServices For You --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DomainKeys

2005-10-10 Thread Matt
John, DomainKeys is designed to validate legitimate E-mail and can't be used to detect illegitimate E-mail any better than a SPAMDOMAINS test can. The problem with crediting E-mail that has only been validated to have passed through such a server is that this fact in itself doesn't have

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] chronic junkmail -- new account

2005-10-10 Thread Imail Admin
So when you look at the header, the only information you can trust is the last server before it reaches your server. Is his server address real? I mean, really his? Does he hijack open relays or spam zombies, or use servers outside of the US? I'm just curious how reliable this information is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DomainKeys

2005-10-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Thanks Matt for the analysis. I kind of thought that was going to be the case, but since I had not heard anything in a while... On an interesting related note, Habeas is still trying to push their stuff. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DomainKeys

2005-10-10 Thread Keith Johnson
John, Is 3.0.5.5 100% stable? I have seen numerous posts on this forum about ongoing issues with MAILFROM (triggering on local unauth. domains), COUNTRY Test and with Multi-Procs (especially above 100K volume per day). I have a call into Declude support on the above to see what is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DomainKeys

2005-10-10 Thread John T \(Lists\)
100% stable is a relative term. It is 100% stable on my server. I am not running a mutli-proc server, I do not use the COUNTRY test as I have some clients that do business with the far east which generally ends up failing, all local domains use authentication unless they are processes in which