No you are absolutly correct - whitelist auth requires Imail version 8.x.
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI
I am getting a lot of spam for 64.192.25.* (which come in with constantly
changing domains, but actually resolve back to
outgoing.liverandcherrys.com). I am reluctant to block the whole class C,
but will likely end up doing so. Is there a better way to handle this?
Kind of a best practices?
You could create a filter file to block REVDNS matching
outgoing.liverandcherrys.com if you have Junkmail Pro, or create a simple
external filter if you don't.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15,
Ok. Haven't used REVDNS before, so didn't think of that one. Is there much
CPU or network overhead in using REVDNS?
Thanks,
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:06 PM
To:
Nope. You're just testing the REVDNS value that has most likely already
been retrieved by Declude.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking on
I usually run the IP number through www.senderbase.org to get a feeling of
the IP block.
In this case:
The netblock registered recently (a month ago) to a company named Direct
Ventures with above average mail flowing coming from suspicious domain
names. The 64.192.24.* is in the same netblock
Sorry to chime in so late... this is what I do:
I add that full class C to a weight of 80% of my hold weight... that weight,
my content filters, body/subject, and combo filters take care of the rest.
So, in the event a real person is sitting on that class C, their email still
comes though,
No, especially if you are using skipifweight directive for the filters. I
use them for all my filters except the safe-mail filters. I use safe-mail
filters to counter balance certain hosts.
Travis
- Original Message -
From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Thanks, Travis. Probably will use that method in the future with some other
IPs. On this one as previously suggested I did set up a filter file using
REVDNS 1 ENDSWITH liverandcherrys.com. Action is delete and seems to be doing
a good job. Already has killed about 300 messages to some 2000
I love the CMDSPACE test, seems to catch a load of spammers.
However, it also catches all of my clients that are using Microsoft
Office Outlook. Build 11.0.5510
Is there a way i can retain the use of this test, and the weight (if
possible), and not have Outlook fail the test?
I mean, of
If MS were to fix it, we wouldn't be detecting a lot of the spam. So, while
on one hand it would be nice if it were fixed... on the other hand the
CMDSPACE test wouldn't be catching nearly as much.
WHITELIST AUTH and custom filters to negate specific senders and servers
that fail this test is
11 matches
Mail list logo
