[Declude.JunkMail] Inserting Filtered Text in Headers

2005-11-29 Thread Dan Geiser
Hello, All, If I have a message which triggers a subject filter, e.g... SUBJECT 275 CONTAINS rolex ...is there anyway I can have the triggered text placed in the headers of the message in a similiar manner to the X-Spam-Tests-Failed header? Has anyone figured out a way to to this? It would

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] web email detection

2005-11-29 Thread Scott Fisher
You could use this as a starting place: MAILPOLICE-WEBMAIL rhsbl webmail.rhs.mailpolice.com 127.0.0.2 0 0 - Original Message - From: nick hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 5:56 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] web email

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] web email detection

2005-11-29 Thread nick hayer
Scott Fisher wrote: You could use this as a starting place: MAILPOLICE-WEBMAIL rhsbl webmail.rhs.mailpolice.com 127.0.0.2 0 0 Thanks Scott - I just found this one and five-ten this am - I think they will do nicely. Thanks for the reply! -Nick - Original Message - From:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Inserting Filtered Text in Headers

2005-11-29 Thread nick hayer
Dan Geiser wrote: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, WEIGHT-HOLD, KROPKA-IP, PSBL, UCEPROTECTL1, FILTER-SUBJECT ('olex') [148] ...or something similar to that. a WARN will give you the line number within the filter that failed. That has been my solut'n.. -Nick It would

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] F-prot

2005-11-29 Thread Ncl Admin
I just opened a window and sat there it finally downloaded took a while. At 05:19 PM 11/28/2005 -0800, Kevin Bilbee wrote: Same problem here. I get an Internal Server Error Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Richard

[Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail version 3.0 features

2005-11-29 Thread Gary Steiner
A list of features for the next version of SmarterMail was posted in their forums this morning, though no release date was given. http://forums.smartertools.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=11125 All previous statements have mentioned end of this year. Gary Steiner --- [This E-mail scanned for

[Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread Robert Shubert
So now I guess the big question is if Declude 3.0.5.20 is compatible with and ready for Imail 2006. Is there any official word on support? Robert --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread Matt
Regardless of any word, anyone that jumps on board a totally new release right after it is made available is asking for trouble. I have seen several instances over the years where Declude had issues with minor changes made in IMail. Some of these things didn't rear their heads until weeks or

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] F-prot

2005-11-29 Thread Gary Steiner
I got the following from F-Prot technical support at 6 AM this morning: Unfortunately we are experiencing some problems with our servers due to extensive traffic. These matters are being looked into as we speak. We apologize for the inconvenience and ask you to try again in about an hour. The

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread Tyler Jensen
Totally agree with you Matt but some feedback from Declude would be nice. I know john T said a couple of weeks ago that Declude was working with a beta 2006 so how is that going Declude? Tyler -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread Darin Cox
Regarding Mac, Ipswitch does have support for Firefox on Mac. Darin. - Original Message - From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 1:31 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready? Regardless of any word, anyone that jumps on

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread Dean Lawrence
Darin, are you sure? In their documentation they explicitly state Windows only. Firefox 1.0.6 for Microsoft Windows Also, from what I read, you are going to have to use a singe ip for all webmail vs. the currentwebmail sharing the ip of each domain. Boy, this is going to be a juggling act to get

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread Eric Hebert
Well on the same overview, We are still running 2.0.6 due to the fact that declude confirm has not been integrated into the new release. An other show stopper for us is the fact that the new web interface support only english at the moment. Since many of our customers are French talking, it's

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread Darin Cox
An Ipswitchdeveloperposted to the IMail list a couple of weeks ago that they had tested and it worked fine in Firefox on Mac. Safari and others browsers on Mac did not work at time of posting and would be added later. Darin. - Original Message - From: Dean Lawrence To:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread Matt
Robert, I suppose that hearing from them that everything is AOK would be consoling to some extent, but that shouldn't change the fact that you should wait. I don't expect that Declude will find but a small percentage of the bugs on their own, and it will take users like us to test and then

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread John T \(Lists\)
While I am willing to take the plunge today, I will be doing so as time permits. I can do this as my server is low volume. I will let everyone know when I do this. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread David Barker
I will have to ask the Developers and get some feedback. Will post when I have something. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyler Jensen Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 1:40 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

[Declude.JunkMail] New SmarterMail List

2005-11-29 Thread Evans Martin
Hey guys! I got really tired of having to log into a web based forum to see what is going on with SmarterMail so I created a list that I hope we can turn into something similar to the IMail or Declude user community lists. Who knows, if enough of us subscribe and start using it, maybe

[Declude.JunkMail] HOLD Action

2005-11-29 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Hi, I see in the manual the syntax of the HOLD action allows me to have HOLD [PATH]. I remember that a while ago the [PATH] was broken and only the HOLD %DATE% worked. Is HOLD [PATH] working now? Now what I would like to do is do a different hold path for each of my gatewayed domains. So in

[Declude.JunkMail] OT - At wits end

2005-11-29 Thread Orin Wells
We have a bit of a puzzler with one our clients in trying to communicate with another domain. What happens is they get 20 attempts failure to deliver. What is REALLY happening is that the DNS servers that service our environment do not see the target domain for some unknown reason and thus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - At wits end

2005-11-29 Thread John T \(Lists\)
The domain you are trying to send to has DNS problems. http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=ucancap.org Your domain has minor DNS problems. http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=cado-oregon.org Have you tried clearing the DNS Cache on your DNS servers? Have you tried

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - At wits end

2005-11-29 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi, Orin- A couple of suggestions First, look at your HOSTS file in c:\winnt\system32\drivers\etc to see if 64.62.134.10 is listed there. Delete the entry if you find it there. Next, add DNS service to your IMail server. Set the DNS servers in Network Properties to known-good upstream