RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Determining Declude Processing Times

Be sure that your dns server is specified in your mail server config Chris From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 11:27 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Determining

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: IIS 4 Advisory

For those of you still running NT 4.0 SP1 with IIS 4 -Original Message- From: VeriSign Customer Support Department [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 07:28 AM Subject: Important Service Notice about your Secure Site Certificate Dear VeriSign SSL Customer: In

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IIS 4 Advisory

Another advisory,, http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20061009/anti-spam-lawsuit.htm Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 9:00 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] INV-URIBL Scoring?

IMO you should never let a single test hold a messages. The question is: what is a single test? Or Is invURIBL a single test? invURIBL does multiple checks insinde and so it's practicaly a set of URIBL-based tests that could add some points to the weighting system. I would consider, to not block

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] INV-URIBL Scoring?

There is a lot of flexiblity in the invuribl scoring. I consider the surbl.org to be a consolidation of separate uribl lists and use the bitmask scoring option. So if somebody is listed on more than one list, they'll get higher weights. I can also score lists such as ws.surbl.org lower because

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] INV-URIBL Scoring?

I hold on just INV-URIBL, but that's just me and I'm no where near as on top of this stuff as most people that post here. That said, I've never found a false positive from INV-URIBL. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent:

[Declude.JunkMail] Verification

I use Declude to filter emails for several domains that are behind our main email box and it has worked well. In this configuration does anyone have a quick solution for Email Account Verification for the servers behind IMail/Declude? Chuck Cahill ---This E-mail came from the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] INV-URIBL Scoring?

INV-URIBL looks at links in all mail that it processes. Not just mail identified as spam. Analyzing links is how it determines the probability of the message being spam. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom

[Declude.JunkMail] Internal AVG vs Fprot CPU?

Has anyone measured the difference in CPU requirements between Fprot and the internal AVG? We've upgraded to the latest Declude and turned off the internal scanner for now. We will probably migrate before the Fprot renewal under the new terms - I just wanted an idea if we have to upgrade to

[Declude.JunkMail] No Email Address

Is there a way to check to see if an email exists before Declude does all the testing...many accounts are gone now and I am sure there are many emails trying to be delivered to addresses that are not there..which is consuming my server...I am at 100% many times trying to process the spam...

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No Email Address

Are you running IMail or SmarterMail ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 3:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] No Email Address Is there a way to check to see if

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Email Address

If the address doesn't exist, then the message will bounce before it gets to Declude. Unless of course you have nobody aliases, which is an extremely bad practice these days. In that case you should remove the nobody alias, and viola, problem solved. If the attempts to deliver to nonexistent

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamHaus

Has anyone been following the SpamHaus debacle? http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20061009/anti-spam-lawsuit.htm - Jay Sudowski // Handy Networks LLC Director of Technical Operations Providing Shared, Reseller, Semi Managed and Fully Managed Windows 2003 Hosting Solutions Tel: 877-70 HANDY

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamHaus

Yes. They are making a good point. The courts shouldn't allow spammers to file SLAPP suits as a way to threaten blacklists out of the business. Even though Spamhaus could have fought this and won quite easily, the fact that one has to spend resources fighting SLAPP suits is a threat in

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Email Address

Imail Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:18 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Email Address

OK, I thought Declude took over first..I know it has been said here before but what are the sequences to deliver an email to a box? Which programs activate first and so on down the line...in Imail Imail Rules IPs blocks Declude invURLB Sortmonster FProt I have all these going on... Richard

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Email Address

Declude is not a mail server. IMail accepts the email for valid email addresses, then passes those messages on to Declude. So if you don't have nobody aliases, then you should check to see if you are under significant dictionary attacks. If so, you can reduce the load on your mail server

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Email Address

Do you have any domains with nobody aliases? Easy to check by doing Start | Run | regedit Access HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE | Software | Ipswitch | Imail | Domains Click Edit | Find Enter nobody and be sure all three boxes are checked Note the domain name for any hits, then click F3 to get tio the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Email Address

Thank you..I will do more leg work to see what I can do...your help is appreciated.. Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet - Original Message - From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com

[Declude.JunkMail] Licensing problem after upgrade

I just upgraded from 3.x to the current version. Nothing will run. All I see in the diags.txt is FATAL ERROR: Product license key not in configuration INVALID KEY Where do I put the update Key? Also the IMAIL Delivery Application is still set to Declude.exe is this correct. Thanks. Fred

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Licensing problem after upgrade

Fred, Your license code should go in the declude.cfg file. -Jeff From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarelli Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:59 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Licensing problem after

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Licensing problem after upgrade

do not have a declude.cfg. What should be in it and where should it go. Do i just rename my global.cfg What about this. Also the IMAIL Delivery Application is still set to Declude.exe is this correct. Should it change to the Decludeprocess.exe - Original Message - From:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Licensing problem after upgrade

My declude.cfg is in C:\Imail\Declude\ and contains the contents below. Be sure to place your serial number in the CODE line (replacing the XXXs) # # This file was distributed for Imail with Declude v4.3 # CODE ---- THREADS 15 #WAITFORMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Licensing problem after upgrade

The delivery app is still declude.exe. Create a new text file in you imail\declude director and call it declude.cfg. Add a line CODE -x-xx-xx- replacing the xxx-xx with your code. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original