I've been having this problem with Declude going back to August and my
installation of 2.0.6. I'm currently running 3.0.6.4 with SmarterMail 2.6. It
seems that irregularly Declude's ip4r tests time out, but SmarterMail
redundantly running the same tests has no trouble picking up the spam. I
I received a couple with the broken gif as late as yesterday. The Declude
headers end up at the bottom of the message, but they are there. I'm running
Declude 3.0.5.26 and SmarterMail 2.6.
Gary
Original Message
From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28,
now,
as 3.0.5.26 had serious problems with handling certain kinds of mime
encapsulate messages. We actually had to roll back to 3.0.5.23 after
reporting the issues with 3.0.5.26 to Declude. Version 3.0.6 fixed this
issue.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL
I've never run ClamAV before. Looking at www.clamav.net, I see there are
several Windows ports for it. Is anyone using one of the various Windows ports
for ClamAV under W2K3? If so, which one is best?
Thanks,
Gary Steiner
Original Message
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL
Possibly this has something to do with the release today of SmarterMail 3.0.
Original Message
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:36 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New 4.0 version of Declude?
I
There seems to be early talk on the SmartTools Forums of bugginess in SM 3.0. I for one am not in any hurry to install it, especially since most of my customers need the Spanish language translation, and that hasn't been released yet. For those interested, this little blip is from the SmarterTools
More info on the new release has been posted here:
http://forums.smartertools.com/forums/12089/ShowPost.aspx
Original Message
From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:27 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail
basically just gave up on it.
Gary Steiner
Original Message
From: Will [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:08 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc causing dns queries to fail
Thank you for the feedback
There is a posting on the SmarterTools Forums that discusses the current
SmarterMail 3.0 BETA test.
http://forums.smartertools.com/forums/11870/ShowPost.aspx
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
.
Matt
Gary Steiner wrote:
Based on the following header lines...
X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see
http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=222.173.57.68;
X-RBL-Warning: DSBL: http://dsbl.org/listing?222.173.57.68;
X-RBL-Warning: MXRATE-BLOCK:
http://www.mxrate.com/lookup
. If this was an IP4R test, the proper variable would either be
%IP4R% or %REMOTEIP%. If this was a RHSBL test, the variable would be
%MAILFROM%.
Matt
Gary Steiner wrote:
So would this work?
BASURA WARN X-RBL-Warning: %TESTNAME%:
http://www.emailbasura.org/cgi-bin/consultaip.pl?%TESTDOMAIN
Based on the following header lines...
X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see
http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=222.173.57.68;
X-RBL-Warning: DSBL: http://dsbl.org/listing?222.173.57.68;
X-RBL-Warning: MXRATE-BLOCK:
http://www.mxrate.com/lookup/refused.asp?ipaddress=222.173.57.68;
X-RBL-Warning:
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 10:30 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] F-prot
I got the following from F-Prot technical support at 6 AM
this morning:
Unfortunately we
I feel the same way. I've answered several questions in their forums and tried to promote discussion where I was able.As for my own questions, I've always received answers, both from their support and from other users.I guess it depends on the nature of the forum and also a little bit of luck.
The following was posted today on SmarterTools web forums: Q: When will we expect to see v. 3? A: The release date depends on the results of final QA. The product is essentially done, just making sure that all the bugs are out of it. Since mail servers are so critical to people's infrastructure,
It doesn't. What happens (and it only seems to happen for the COUNTRIES
filter) is that it prints a line for every line in the filter file. The US
that you see is what it found in the message, and it is comparing US to every
line in the filter file.
Gary
Original Message
Will your replacement also work with SmarterMail? I believe the only
difference between IMail and SmarterMail in this case is how they name their
files.
Gary Steiner
Original Message
From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:29 PM
A list of features for the next version of SmarterMail was posted in their
forums this morning, though no release date was given.
http://forums.smartertools.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=11125
All previous statements have mentioned end of this year.
Gary Steiner
---
[This E-mail scanned
.
The problem seems to be fixed, as I was finally able to download the new
version with no delays from their web site.
Gary Steiner
Original Message
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 8:20 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE
Same here. I've been trying for over 8 hours straight with no luck.
Gary Steiner
Original Message
From: Richard Farris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 7:49 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] F-prot
Anyone using F-Prot
CONTAINS DE and
COUNTRIES 1 CIBTAUBS *A
Also the country filters were broken in early 3.0.5.x versions.
- Original Message -
From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] hops
I have a spam that produce the following:
X-Country-Chain: [Multicast]-GERMANY-destination
The country code check flagged it as Germany (DE). Is there any way to flag
both hops? I'm using the default setting which has HOP set to 0.
Thanks,
Gary
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by
Public Data Network
#*E RIPE Unlisted (Europe, North Africa, Middle East)
#*I Private IP
#*L Loopback
#*M Multicast
#*P APNIC Unlisted (Asia Pacific)
#*R IANA Reserved
#*U Unknown
- Original Message -
From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent
I'm trying to understand the different Declude configuration files. I'm
running 3.x Pro with JM and EV under SmarterMail.
I've seen mention of the Declude.cfg file, but my configuration doesn't have
one. I see global.cfg, virus.cfg, confirm.cfg and hijack.cfg, as well as the
3.0.5.7? How did you get that version?
When I go to the Declude web page and log in to my account, there is a box
there that says Declude Upgrades and in that box it has a link that says
Declude 3.0.5.3. When I click on that link, it takes me to another page that
has some links on it that
I'm confused by the SmarterMail reference. I thought the Q naming convention
was unique to IMail. I'm using SmarterMail 2.6, and the only names I've seen
have been *.EML and *.HDR files. Did an older version of SmarterMail use Q
files? The only renaming I've seen is a switch between
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 6:06 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] opening a ticket with Declude support
David,
As per our past off
It used to be that when I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would get an
automatic reply like the following:
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is
[xxx--].
Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject
(including
in your virus.cfg file.
What specific issues are you refering to with 2.x ? I will follow up on this
and respond.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:01 PM
configuration and it might well not be a bug.
Matt
Gary Steiner wrote:
I've been receiving a flurry of spam over the past two days where the spam
gets delivered with no Declude header in the message. When viewing the log
files, it seems that Declude scanned the message, found
David,
As per our past off-the-list discussion, I had re-lowered the times to 120, but
when this sudden increase of spam occurred yesterday, I raised them back up to
300. It doesn't seem to have had any effect.
Gary
Original Message
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've seen very little specific to blocking Spanish spam. There is a blacklist
at http://www.emailbasura.org/ but its effectiveness is somewhat limited.
Original Message
From: A. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:48 PM
To: Declude JunkMail
I guess this would be the best source for current country codes:
http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/list-en1.html
ARIN's list lets you break it down by region:
http://www.arin.net/community/countries.html
Original Message
From: Darrell
, so I have no idea how recent it
is. Does anyone know if it's been updated recently?
~Joe
- Original Message -
From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest ALL_LIST.DAT
I
Unlisted (Asia Pacific)
*R IANA Reserved
*U Unknown
- Original Message -
From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 2:06 PM
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] ROUTING and COUNTRIES
I guess it depends on exactly what text
Of Gary Steiner
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 12:11 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ROUTING and COUNTRIES
If Declude is reading this, maybe they could add these values to their
Knowledge Base.
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid
I guess it depends on exactly what text it is searching for. In looking at my
log files (set to Debug), I see that when it is checking the COUNTRIES filter I
created, it displays a message like Checking countries: *A . Is it actually
looking for an asterisk followed by an A? Here are some
I've received a couple replies over time from Declude Support illustrated in
the following header:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 09 20:22:49 2005
Received: from static-68-162-218-198.BOS.east.verizon.net [68.162.218.198] by
mail.plusultraweb.com with SMTP;
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 20:22:49
I'm confused. The page in the Knowledge Base
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=11
says to put it in the global.cfg file. It also says nothing about adding the
ON switch. I even exchanged emails with Declude support back on Aug. 2
stating that I was putting
I continue to run into a problem where Declude fails to get any response from
the ip4r blacklists, then SmarterMail catches the exact same spam using the
ip4r blacklists(spamcop, cbl, spamhaus, etc.). Declude support implied that
there was a problem with my DNS server. But both Declude and
Message -
From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 11:09 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r blacklists
I continue to run into a problem where Declude fails to get any response
from the ip4r blacklists, then SmarterMail
Regarding #5. I've run into spam that was sent to multiple addresses on the
server, and the spam was processed by Declude (it's listed in the log files),
but somehow when this spam is then moved to the hold directory it gets confused
and somehow loses track of the file, and the file doesn't
Welcome to Notepad!
I've also been looking for a utility to do this, but haven't found it yet.
Spam Review was recommended to me, but I was disappointed to find out that it
only works with IMail - not SmarterMail. You can download it here -
http://www.sunlightsoftware.com/spamreview.htm
The
101 - 143 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
