[Declude.JunkMail] outgoing mail

hello, i've got a question: i want to scan outgoing mail with declude. actually we're only scanning incoming mail. we're planning to use the existing tests on incoming mail and new tests on outgoing mail. we're using declude 3.1.0 with imail 7 can anybody help? --- This E-mail came from

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] AFTERJM

hi, we handle it for years like bonno described. it works fine. but we modified the system a little bit. we gather all held mail in a directory where we use the %DATE% - funtionality - so all held mails of one day are caught in a separated directory. each night (when there is little work for

[Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc stopped working

Hi, a few days ago, the decludeproc-service just stopped working without any reason i could tell. attached are 3 files, one part of our log and the two files declude created. has anybody encountered something similar or just an idea what happened? bernd goebbels LDSNRW Düsseldorf Germany

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] Country Code

hi scott, i think what you need is an update of the all_list.dat-file located in the declude-directory, it should contain all region-codes. if yours is old, a few changes because of new countrys etc. are not in the list and you're missing the steps in the country chain. my problem is that i

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] Bugfix: Imail 8.22 and ICS 2.02 released

hi, we're using imail 7.15, does anybody know if this is effected too? bernd goebbels LDSNRW duesseldorf germany -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 17:15 An:

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] spool not delivered

. Darrell DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive reporting for Declude Junkmail and Virus. Try it today http://www.invariantsystems.com Goebbels, Bernd (LDS) writes: we're monitoring something strange: there are a lot (11.000) d

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] SPFFAIL? Under 3.0

yes, i've seen some hits, but for the wrong mails. i think, as i posted before, that declude 3.0.5.12 really messes up with the failed tests. bernd -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Gesendet: Donnerstag,

[Declude.JunkMail] problem with declude 3.0.5.12

just detected a new bug (or ist it a feature?): i 've got mails moved to a special directory even if they don't trigger the specified test. i.e. content of $default$.junkmail: GESPERRTEANHAENGE HOLD g:\imail\gesperrteanhaenge\%DATE% there is NO way that this mail could trigger the

[Declude.JunkMail] problem with declude 3.0.5.12

hi @ all, we updated from 2.0 to 3.0.5.12 on monday. since then, we're looking into some strange effects: some of our tests doesn't seen to be started for every mail, for some mail they start, for others, they don't. since we are using a lot of combo-tests, this is causing us a lot of trouble.

[Declude.JunkMail] 100% CPU usage with declude

@all: im using a 4 processor 2,7Ghz pentium iv machine with win2003 server updated with sp1 and imail. yesterday, i updated from declude 2.0.6.14 to 1.81 because my cpu-usage stayed continuosly on 100%. with the numbers of mail coming in, i would expect it to be at an average from 50-70%. i saw

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] 100% CPU usage with declude

sorry, misunderstanding, next time i will try the declude.cfg. wasn't it said that it had to be put in global.cfg? oops. the cpu was used by declude processes, i had up to 30 at a time but only 4-5 took 100% with an average of 20-25% each. the only thing runnig at the same time (besides

[Declude.JunkMail] bug in jm 2.0.6

hi, this morning, we updated from 2.0.5 to 2.0.6. the hold action doesn't work properly. in $default.$junkmail, we selected a special directory for those mails who failed a certain test, this worked great with 2.0.5. 2.0.6 moves these mails to the hold directory under spool. the manual says: The

[Declude.JunkMail] viruses getting thru

Title: Possible official host name change hi, we use declude junkmail with imail andf-prot anti-virus on a win2003-server machine. there has been a short period of 10-15 minutes, where our machine was so busy that it let "some" viruses through (855 !!!). is there anybody out there, who

[Declude.JunkMail] hold and alert combined

is there a possibility to hold a mail and alert the recipient? our problem is that german law may force us to do this. bernd goebbels ldsnrw

[Declude.JunkMail] new decoding-problem

hi scott, we received a new mail, wich contains an attachment. the filename is coded as follows: --=_NextPart_000_0052_01C4BA43.77601E5CContent-Type: application/octet-stream;name="=?koi8-r?B?NC5wZGYuZXhl?="Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64Content-Disposition:

[Declude.JunkMail] maybe problem within combination declude junkmail/declude virus

hi scott, maybe we have detected a problem within the combination of junkmail and declude virus. we think we found a spammer bypassing junkmail by a simple trick. we are afraid to describe the problem here on list because other spammers may be on the list too and if they see how it works, all of

[Declude.JunkMail] problem with spaces

hi scott, i know it's been discussed before, but isn't there a possibility to add something to declude, thatdeals with preceeding spaces in filters? for example: ANYWHERE 20 CONTAINS badword catches: - badword -anotherwordbadword etc. but it's not possible to catch only the "

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working for me...I think!

Hi, I'm very interested, please send more informations. thanx, Bernd Bernd Goebbels LDS NRW -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. November 2003 09:26 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD

AW: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: unixtools help

Hi, just try the good old awk! excample: $ awk 'BEGIN {sum=0} \ {sum += $14+$15} \ END {print \nSUM: sum}' logfile.txt line BEGIN : initialzes the variable (sum) next line : adds to variable the colums 14 and 15 (colums separated by one ore more blanks) line