Rob,
How does the AUTOWhite handle spoofed addressing when someone
uses my address to send email? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Robert Grosshandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate
Does anyone have any configs they are willing to share that they are using in
production for Alligate
Rob,
If you don't mind sharing, what config settings do you use for
Alligate..
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Robert Grosshandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate vs. Message
Does anyone have any configs they are willing to share that they are using in
production for Alligate with Declude? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
áÁj)pjËjyÞuú+¾*î±ëÈ7ç^V*î²m§ÿðÃ^r[yÊN¬f¢yúèØ^
ç%¹ºyj)fj)b b²Ôèº{.nÇ+·£ºËlzwZI[hf¢Êïuç%¹¢f§vzé®Þ
ç%¹ºyj)S
æ«r¯zÇ·¢éÝjØm¶ÿÃ
global file, what should I
alter to pickup just the sbl.spamhaus.org database? Thanks for the aid.
Keith Johnson
Given that OSSRC and OSSOFT are no longer effective, besides EASYNET-DNSBL and
SPAMCOP, what are others giving good Weight to, thanks for the info.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 8/1/2003 5:01 PM
To:
.
Again, thanks for the aid, I wouldn't push it this hard, but we have gotten numerous
of these slipping through.
http://www.intuitive.com/coolweb/entities.html
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson
Sent: Fri 6/13/2003 5:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
; (put together no spaces). Has others seen this, and how are you detecting it. Thanks for the info.
___
Keith Johnson
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
Title: Message
Are
these type of emails been seen for awhile or are they new?
Thanks...
Keith
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:38 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Character
Entities
We are starting to see a flood
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammanager question
We have the sniffer product and it works great, we wanted
to automate a 'HoneyPot' type of scenario. Thanks for the suggestions.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
Scott,
It says in the release notes for 1.68:
Whitelist files will now work as exact matches, rather than partial matches
Does this mean that if we have whitelistfile in the default.junkmail file that we
need to have the exact match (email addresses) to let through. For example,
Title: Message
Scott,
I meant to ask you if the ALLRECIPS functionality was by
design, or was this something you were working on altering. Thanks for the
info.
Keith
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
JohnsonSent: Saturday
Are you using a copyall account? If so, ALLRECIPS would contain the
copyall account as well as the user that you were sending to, so ALLRECIPS
0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED] would never match.
Scott, I am not using the 'copyall' account. However, this is on a
Scott,
Thanks for the discovery. The reason I was wanting to use the IS, is due to
not wanting to step on email addresses that maybe valid. For example, if he had an
ex-employee that had the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] , but has a valid user called
[EMAIL PROTECTED] If I use the
Andy,
We have a bunch of gateway domains setup and works great. You have to have
the Pro version and setup per domain folders under declude folder (i.e. folder called
example.com) with a default junkmail file inside it. Define your tests within the
Global.cfg file and then set actions
.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
for some
suggestions. Thanks for the aid.
___
Keith
Johnson, MCP Network Engineer
Network Advocates,
Inc. Tel:
502.412.1050 Fax:
502.412.1058 Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Good pings come in small
packets"
? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
Johnson
-Original Message-From: John Tolmachoff
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003
4:28 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] Filter Help
Use delete action
on that test.
John
Tolmachoff MCSE
Is it possible to place wildcards in the whitelistfile (using 1.67beta). For example,
user is requesting to allow everything for *.il.us Can I put wildcards in the
whitelistfile or just put .il.usThanks for the info.
áÁj)pjËjyÞuú+¾*î±ëÈ7ç^V*î²m§ÿðÃ^r[yÊN¬f¢yúèØ^
ç%¹ºyj)fj)b
Per John's advice (thanks for the post), I have setup the following on a Store and
Forward Domain, I am using 1.67beta Pro Version
In my Global file:
EXEMPL filter c:\Imail\Declude\exempl.txt x 0 0
In my Default JunkMail file for that domain
EXEMPL DELETE
In my
Scott,
If we use the ROUTETO (fail Weight20) command with our Store and Forward
domains, the spamming domain will show up as a domain that sent mail OUT in my
domlist? I took a look today and I saw tons of domains in there with 1 or more emails
a piece and the only thing I could
Scott,
How common is this type of entry in the header - Disposition-Notification-To: ?
We are seeing a few of these get through, however, it seems there is some code,
Googled the above, that send a read receipt back to the user, thus you end up with yet
more junkmail. Is this common
Scott,
Is this thread something different than the Whitelistfile option for the per
domain junkmail configs (using 1.67beta)?
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 3/3/2003 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL
are interested.
Darrell LaRock
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 4:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Analyzer - Comments Needed
Darrell,
That is awesome. I
and understand that, then I can Whitelist for one specific domains as well. Thank you for the aid.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
Scott,
Thank you. What scenario I have is a company coming on board
that has list-serv email they do not want to have weights given against.
But, if this lists do indeed fail our tests then I would like for them
to be the only ones to get it, not all my other domains. It sounds like
the
.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
Another strange occurrence, is prior to the upgrade, in our
postmaster.eml
file for Declude Virus we had notifications going to two different
recipients (prior both domains were virtual to our box). These two
different domains are now setup as store/forward domains,
however, they
I wanted to gain some advise on using message sniffer. It seems to be (from forum
comments) to be an awesome product. Is the message sniffer database of know spammers
kept up on their end and the test within declude checks it? Is the test quick per
10,000 emails? Thanks for the info.
Thank you for the info and link. From a transmission standpoint, when the sniffer
test is called, does it send you the message, you scan it, and then report back. Or
do you come to the message and scan it and then report back. Thank you again, for
your time.
Keith Johnson
TAIS Web
Wilcox World Travel Tours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL
It states in the manual that by default JunkMail will use the outgoing section configs
of the global.cfg file to scan 'gateway' (store and forward) domains. However, use
the per domain configurations to override the behavior. With this in mind, will the
fromfile filters and tests I have
.
JT Fullerton, CA 92835
JT www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Store and Forward w
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Scott,
You are a wonderful human being, thanks for all your aid, you
fixed it before I even asked
Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Store
Since late last year we have had our entire setup with virtual hosted domains with No
Mail Relay. We are going to change our relay mode to 'relay for addresses' to filter
email for about 10 or more Exchange Servers (thus, store and forward). However, we
are going to still require all our
Steve,
From your previous message you stated you were using the ROUTETO
parameter to a mailbox called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I am running the weight10 test, and doing a ROUTETO
to a mailbox called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What we do is have the customer (admin for that host.com) login
to
.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:29 AM
Darrell,
That is awesome. I get those same requests from our clients
weekly. I appreciate your time in writing it.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Darrell L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Steve,
If I am not mistaken (Scott can correct me), since Declude has already looked
at it once, you can forward this to the intended user and it won't get scanned again
by JunkMail.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Steve Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL
Scott,
Do you have any suggestions on a filter we could use to
accomplish the FOOTER on outgoing email (per prior message)? I have a
customer who wants this for legal reasons. I have asked that he could
place a 'signature' on each of his email clients, however, he doesn't
want to give
John,
Speaking of lists, whose lists do you use.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Comments
On the subject of the new comments
I use a product called wintail for Windows (like tail from Unix), it is available from
www.wintail.com for free. It allows you to look realtime a spool file while the
connections are being made, thus not having to open notepad up, close it, open it,
etc. Good luck,
Keith
Title: How to append footer to a single domain using Jmail Pro
How would I go about setting a footer for a single domain on their Outgoing email? I understand I should use the catchallmails but not sure how? Thanks for the aid.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Kami,
I wanted to see if it would be possible to look at your lists, however, I
noticed it required a password. Thank you again.
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: Kami Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 1/21/2003 6:46 PM
To:
Adam,
Would love a copy emailed ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), although my logs
are just now going over 10mb, we keep adding customers weekly, so it
won't be long before it is to large to handle. Thanks for the program,
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: Adam Hobach [mailto:[EMAIL
know if our test fails a fromfile test it lists in the header. Thanks for any aid.
___
Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
We are using the Junkmail Pro edition in an email ISP like environment (i.e. numerous
virtual domains). We have setup Junkmail Pro to send the spam for each domain into a
central mailbox that an admin would then periodically check for any false pos. and
thus forward respect. I wanted to gain
Kami,
If you don't mind sharing with me as well. We are trying to
tighten down and it is always great to gain perspective from someone in
the trenches. Off list email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your
time.
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: Don Schreiner [mailto:[EMAIL
I know this is off subject for this forum, but has anyone experienced any problems
posting to the Imail Forum list. I have posted several messages, but they have not
appeared and I haven't seen anything posted since yesterday around 6pm. Thanks for
the info.
Keith
+¨¥Á«,q©çy×è®ø«ºÇ¬o
The adult sender's list I have was gathered over time from
reports from users and from ones I have seen in the SPAM folder.
I would be happy to share it.
That would be awesome if you don't mind. Please email me off list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Again, thank you for your time and professionalism
of? Thanks for the aid..
___
Keith Johnson
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel: 502.412.1050
Fax: 502.412.1058
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good pings come in small packets
Please forgive me for me not knowing, but what is the all_list.dat?
Thanks..
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat
Should we be downloading
Sandy,
I am very interested in your beta code (understanding it's beta). Thank
you for your knowledge and contribution.
Keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 12/18/2002 9:00
If you don't mind, is this report 1.05b something that I could download
(i.e. declude website). If so, what is the name of this reporting tool?
Thank you,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Believe I found it, called DeLog by Image'fx Thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Shared Kill File Stats
If you don't mind, is this report 1.05b something that I
Tom,
You are awesome, thanks for such great tools and support.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Juliano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Shared Kill File Stats
If you don't mind, is
as
this forum.
Keith Johnson
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:tom;imagefxonline.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx
50% effective
List of spammers caught by the Fromfile
The original install of Declude includes a line in global.cfg that
states WHITELIST HABEAS. I assume I can remark this out since we are
receiving warnings in the log files called Invalid Whitelist test
Habeas. Thanks for the input.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Scott,
Thanks for the reply. Speaking of the beta version - is it best
to run the beta vs the 1.60. I guess we shy on the conservative side so
at first glance the 1.60 was a good fit, however, if the 1.62 version is
better (i.e. more features, bug fixes), and has proven stable, we may
I've seen several emails come thru referencing 3rd party hold
readers/reviewers. Does anyone have a pref on one. Also, I have gotten
some feedback from Scott (much apprec.) on what he sees as a initial
setup for guarding against spam. I would like to see what options
others have unlocked or
101 - 163 of 163 matches
Mail list logo