Re: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

Hello, Same Here. I love the ease of use with F-prot. And the license is great so we have it running on all our in-house systems. I have also started using it on all our corporate customers where we provide IT Support. I just get the customer an F-prot license for $40 (20 users) and can install

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] CIDR listings for china, Korea, Taiwan

John, Thank you for the offer. I would be very interested in what you are doing and how you are blocking all the Asian SPAM. Ken FIAM - Support - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: RE:

[Declude.JunkMail] Per User defaults

Hello Scott, We have been using Declude Junk Mail for almost one year and have about 5% of our users that have opted out of the program for one reason or another. I have a question about the per user default file. I have set all the tests to IGNORE or WARN. But my question is, can I just

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Antivirus Declude Junkmail

Hi Korey, Good question. But I don't know of any reason anyone would want to use Imail Antivirus when we have Declude JunkMail and Declude Antivirus backed by Scott's support. Ken - FIAM Support - Original Message - From: Korey Verlsteffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Heads Up

Hello Scot, Thanks for the Heads Up about the AOL Mail Server. AS an FYI, on a scale of 10, I've lowered SPAMCOP from 5 down to 2. We get so much AOL business e-mail, I can't afford to be deleting customer e-mails. If you ever find out that the AOL Server is taken off the SPAMCOP

[Declude.JunkMail] FYI New Problem with MediaOne

Hello, Just a quick heads up. MediaOne (ATT RoadRunner here in the northeast) just had one of their mail servers blackholed in the ORBZ database. http://orbz.org/?24.147.1.144 It has prompted a number of call and complaints to our Customer Service. I don't know if it is just one mail server

[Declude.JunkMail] DECmmdd.log Is Just Getting Too Big Deccon.exe

Hi Scott, Thanks again for the GREAT Tech Support. Just two quick questions. 1) Our DECmmdd.log is just getting too big. I guess we are just tracking too much good data. With the LOG set to low, the file still approaches 150 to 250 MB each day. In $default$ I have everything set to WARN except

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DECmmdd.log Is Just Getting Too Big

Thanks Scott, Using LOG_OK NONE works nicely. [1] You can add a line LOG_OK NONE to the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file. This will change it so that Declude will not log any of the Message OK lines. Thanks Again Ken --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Some way to tell which tests failed?

Hello Scott, I also use only the Weight system and would like a way to tell just what test failed. But sometimes I get lost following these threads that cross several days worth of e-mails. So if I'm redundant, please excuse my lack of attention. I would like to have one line in the e-mail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Comparing Weight Configurations

Hello Mike, Thanks for sharing your Configuration. I like your three strikes out approach. I use the same approach but with slightly different set of values. I find it very interesting that some of us can HOLD and look at each e-mail. We process 75,000 to 110,000 per day. So I also have to be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam filtering tests

Hello Chuck, Our false positives almost dropped to zero using the weight test. Check the e-mail from a couple of days ago and you will see our settings. Good Luck Ken - Original Message - From: Chuck Schick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:30