Thanks. Mine too.
From: John Doyle [mailto:jdo...@spicehunter.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 4:18 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?
Robert
look in the declude log file, for
CT-BULK or CT-SPAM (depending on how you set it up
You can probably contact the message sniffer folks directly. There's not much
about Declude itself that requires updates, so long as it is working.
http://armresearch.com/
Good luck,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: declude [mailto:decl...@mail.net1media.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03,
That actually was a feature already built by someone many moons ago. He was /
is a Declude user. It used to be listed on the declude site.
http://www.eservicesforyou.com/products/autowhite.html
-Original Message-
From: David Barker [mailto:dbar...@declude.com]
Sent: Thursday, February
should be
able to create automatically with a script).
Robert
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:17 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail
Hi All -
We're
Thanks. It would have 1,000,000 aliases in it, I can't imagine that would
be easy to process.
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Robert
Shubert
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 9:55 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs
?
Cheers,
Eddie
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 9:17 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail
Hi All -
We're currently using Imail v2006. We had no need
gateway.
Wouldn't Domainkeys/Dkim still work without needing to change everyone's
email address?
Cheers,
Eddie
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 9:17 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail
I was about to upgrade my SmarterMail server this evening. What kind of
issues are they having with 7?
- MEC
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent
Hi All -
We're currently using Imail v2006. We had no need to upgrade and the iMail
versions until this year didn't support some features we needed (primariy
DomainKey / DKIM signing of outbound mail. ) We'd considered moving to
Smartermail, but it didn't (and doesn't) support a feature we
Hi
We get a reasonable number of spam /virus laden emails with the following
characteristics.
1) Sent to multiple recipients
2) A single line in the email, consisting of a URL.
The email is probably being sent by infected machines. It comes from legit
email addresses.
Hi
If we're running Sniffer, and we set this up as a Declude test (we're not
able to reject connections based on the info), isn't it being double counted
(once from SNF, once on its own?)
Thanks,
Rob
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Hi
Occassionally, we're getting false positives on the email to us
containing:
[Outlook 'MIME segment in MIME Postamble' Vulnerability]
I'm sure they do contain that problem, but false in that they're not
malicious (I don't think.)
People still blocking on this?
Thanks,
Rob
From what I read, Interceptor (which we tried in its earlier incarnation,
eons ago) doesn't include the Hijack functionality (the design wouldn't
support it.)
Rob
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Dan
Shadix
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:15 PM
To:
Sounds like a spam headline, doesnt it?
Anyway, were getting obvious spam, but were not able to weight it enough
to block it. Any tests you might suggest. The following came to us BCCd,
I believe. Nothing about it was appropriate for us.
Here are the headers:
Received: from
Hi All -
Rather than learn something new (my brain is overfull, and still feels
empty), I'm hoping somebody has a filter or guidance for the following need.
I don't want to move to per-user configurations if I can help it.
I'd like to have a filter that adds weight when an email fails a
The PCRE for yahoo.co.uk might just be the ticket.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:58 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need strategy to up score.
Hi
We're getting spam that comes via Yahoo, looks good (but it isn't). We'd
like to up the score it receives, so it won't get passed through. We use
Sniffer/Declude/Inviurbl.
We're almost always Bcc'd.
Sometimes fails Sniffer, sometimes not (we've got a query into them, too.)
Doesn't always
recipients not listed in the
headers.
BCC BCC 3 x 6 0
Where 3 is the number of BCC recipients and 6 is the weight given.
David B
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent: Tuesday
Blocking Email
Rob,
We are using domain keys and reverse DNS as well as SPF records. Do you
have a link to where I would request the whitelisting?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent: Thursday, February 21
More. Yahoo has whitelisting, and really cares about reverse DNS pointers
and Domain Keys. You might want to resubmit, they were fast for us way back
when.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Thursday, February 21,
Gents and the occasional lady:
You all are the smartest network folks I interact with. If you'd be so kind
as to give me your opinion / suggestions on the following, I'd be forever
grateful.
We're trying to increase the level of uptime and redundancy for our service.
To that end, we're looking
We're really happy with gammadyne mailer. www.gammadyne.com
We send about 200K pieces a week, the db is sql server.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 4:29 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Hi All -
Our opt-in newsletter is being rejected by users with Barracuda firewalls as
spam. I'm looking for a single place to report this / request to be
whitelisted at Barracuda, and I'm having no luck.
Any pointers appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Rob
Robert N
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Hi
We get e-mails that contain the following header (or something similar):
Received: from igive.com [71.250.241.101] by smtp.igive.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD-9.20)
The 71.xxx.xxx.xxx isn't ours. That IP can vary, but it is never ours.
Are there any legit mailers that would send something in this
15 IS igive.com
Set it at your hold weight. Your actual server(s) IP addresses should already
be whitelisted so it will not affect your internal mail routing.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Grosshandler
Sent
Fwiw it worked for us.
.. Original Message ...
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:11:57 -0400 Dave Doherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I attempted to install this update on my server. The package is apparently
missing a DLL. The decludeproc service would not start, and the pop-up said
to contact
Hi
We're seeing bounce messages similar to the following. I don't think our
server has been compromised, but I want to be sure. We legitimately send
mail from 208.100.26.91, but I think (hope) its appearance in the following
is spoofed.
Many thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 11:02 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce / Spoof Analysis Help Please
You're safe, Robert.
I've seen
Hi
We're getting certain e-mails whitelisted, and I'm not able to find where
we've done that to ourselves.
Here's a line from a whitelist entry I CAN find:
Skipping3 E-mail from IP 208.100.26.91; whitelisted [208.100.26.91]
Here's a line from the whitelist entry I CANNOT find:
Skipping4
We’re using it, no observed problems. Latest Declude / Sniffer / Imail 2006.2
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephan
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:03 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006.2
Has
will quickly disappear over the next few months. Keep in mind that if
you need to serve a lot of Mac webmail users or require SSL support on your
protocols, you might want to wait it out some, those areas are the biggest
faults at the moment.
Best,
Robert
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi all --
Recently, there was discussion of an issue with AVG.
Is that addressed in today's release?
Thanks,
Rob
=
Robert Grosshandler
iGive.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type
Congrats to all. Finally.
Rob
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
: Robert Grosshandler mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:55 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Turning outbound scanning off
Hi
Declude is working wonderfully, too wonderfully. It is scanning e-mail
we're sending out from our server, and we
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Turning outbound scanning off
That would turn off virus scanning, but not junkmail scanning.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Grosshandler mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday
Hi
Declude is working wonderfully, too wonderfully. It is scanning e-mail
we're sending out from our server, and we don't want it to do that, since it
adds headers and stuff that have no purpose, and might actually cause
filter issues on the receiving end. We don't need it to do outbound virus
from whatever the CA db mirroring
application is.
Hope that helps.
Rob
Robert Grosshandler
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail
Database mirroring is not the same as
clustering. You dont need the same kind of resources and licenses.
Robert E. Spivack
VP Sales Marketing
Voicegateway.com Web Services / SPIV Technologies Group
(408) 834-8560
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
SPLA licensing is very affordable. There are no SPLA licenses for many
3rd party products so staying with Microsoft is actually cheaper if you
are a service provider.
Robert E. Spivack
VP Sales Marketing
Voicegateway.com Web Services / SPIV Technologies Group
(408) 834-8560
[EMAIL
run without the witness server, but then you don't
automatic failover.
And of course, you need to be using the new SQL server 2005 native
client libraries on the client stations for transparent/automatic
failover.
Robert E. Spivack
VP Sales Marketing
Voicegateway.com Web Services / SPIV
and whether to force a fail over to
the second server.
Robert E. Spivack
VP Sales Marketing
Voicegateway.com Web Services / SPIV Technologies Group
(408) 834-8560
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sanford Whiteman
Sent
(clustered/storage file system) solution.
I'd be curious to hear if Sandy or anyone has compared db mirroring to
double-take and other solutions that made sense before this feature was
available but may be less desirable now.
Robert E. Spivack
VP Sales Marketing
Voicegateway.com Web Services / SPIV
David --
The problem exists in Interceptor, as well, so a fix from Ipswitch or
Smartermail isn't going to solve all of the problems, unfortunately.
If it helps at all, every message that is malformed this way is bad, spam
scores off the charts.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
on on the
backup, a bunch of bad stuff is more likely to get through.
Advice, pointers welcomed. Thanks in advance
Rob
Robert N. Grosshandler
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type
Test, please ignore.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Sorry for the multiple tests, please ignore.
Rob
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
test - ignore
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
Test
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Hi All -
We've been very happy users of Sniffer for several years,
but now that Declude is including the Commtouch solution, we need to consider
it.
Any thoughts, comparisons, suggestions?
We're a very small shop, if that matters. We're not
an ISP, so the licensing weirdness doesn't
he's got my vote.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Butch AndrewsSent:
Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:14 AMTo:
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Goober of the
year
I must write the list to see if my customer meets the
criteria for "goober"
Hi
We're not a service provider (but I love and value the fact that all of you
are!)
Rob
What I find particularly amusing is the line Restrictions apply to service
providers. If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing list who is not
a service provider, please raise your hand.
---
Correction David B, Postini offers a great product, it's Declude with the
product that is questionable.
We switched most of our services over to Postini and have been glad to avoid
the bugs, crashes, and huge price hikes of Declude. In comparison, as our
Postini volume grows, our costs are
1) Commtouch offering - I got to My Account, and I don't see anything to
give me a hint on pricing. Pointer requested!
2) Is this service competitive or complementary to Message Sniffer?
Thanks,
Rob
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an
, and Log Parsers.
Robert Grosshandler writes:
1) Commtouch offering - I got to My Account, and I don't see anything
to give me a hint on pricing. Pointer requested!
2) Is this service competitive or complementary to Message Sniffer?
Thanks,
Rob
---
This E-mail came from
Folks -
Once in awhile, we (really,me) get e-mails from folks using Blackberrys.
The body is blank. I'm trying to track down the cause.
We're using Imail 8.22 all patches applied. Latest version of Declude.
The same e-mail, going through a different e-mail server (not Imail /
Declude) goes
Sorry if this is waste of time, but I want
to be absolutely sure before I do anything to my server.
Is Declude 4.2 fully compatible with iMail
8.22?
Thanks,
Robert
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
Server
Hi Robert,
All very good questions.
The client is paying for piece work as
opposed to an hourly rate so monitoring time spent against time billed is not a
concern.
Mostly they want to know if the developers
are using the environment that has been provided to them. 2 SQL servers, 2
Lets start at the high-level:
What question are you trying to
answer?
e.g:
Are the developers
spending enough time doing the work they should be doing?
Are the developers doing
things they should not be doing?
Are the developers competent
and performing their job properly?
Another option to consider ... www.ultradns.com has a service that does
this. I've never priced it, so it may be pricey.
Rob
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
Stay away from Open-E - its
closed and proprietary as far as expandability.
Its just Linux in Flash
module with a GUI. They charge extra to use a hardware raid controller,
faster NICs, and nickel and dime other options too. It only supports a
limited choice of approved hardware.
If
This has been a problem with Declude for a while now, and so far, their
attempts to fix have not borne any fruit. They are painfully aware.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Olden
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 8:54 AM
To:
Haven't tried it, but the support costs look astronomical.
Have you considered SmarterMail? Many IMail customers have switched to
SmarterMail as it integrates fairly well with Declude, has most of the
existing features of IMail, and has many other features still not supported
in IMail.
It's
Sure - if you don't mind giving up all your privacy to Google and letting
them peek at your web traffic.
BTW - almost all web analytic tools offer embedded tracking options in
lieu off, or in addition to, log file parsing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
What version are you using? The Current versions are Livestats.XSP or
Livestats.NET versions are V8.xx
The earlier versions were a lot more buggy - this version is very solid
since they eliminator the collector tasks and just use direct file access
or ftp to access the log files.
I do wish they
@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
OT: Microsoft Open License
Robert,
I think that did a good amount of research and I do in fact have my facts
straight. It appears rather that you just simply didn't read my message
fully.
At this moment, SPLA isn't a good deal for me, though I recognize
Matt, get the facts before you rant.
If you are running a business then
you should be adhering to the rules. I cant believe you have been
hosting sites/email services for so long and not been aware of SPLA.
I think your rant is totally
offbase. Let me give you (and others lurking)
Unfortunately not. Remember,
thats a shared sql server account not a dedicated sql server for
$9.95/month. If somebody wants to put 500 sql accounts on a single Celeron
server, well, caveat emptor.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John T (Lists)
One limitation in SmarterMail is you can't turn off the built-in webmail
commands for mark as spam which is used to build the spam/ham queues for
the internal Bayesian filters.
Since we aren't using the SmarterMail filters, this is basically a confusing
no op option for our users and we would
I haven't received notification of 3.06. Did others receive a notice that
it was available?
Rob
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Title: Message
Would you be so kind as to post this
filter?
Thanks ahead of time
Rob
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran
JovanovicSent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 8:33 AMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Combo
Filter
FYI
Title: Message
You the Man!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran
JovanovicSent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:39 AMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Combo
Filter
Here you
go
TESTSFAILED END
CONTAINS BYPASS
# Did it Fail
According to SmarterTools site, version 3 is finally out.
Im anxious to hear if the port 587
stuff is working right, among all the other new things this one is important
catch-up feature with Imail.
It also looks like they added subfolder handling
to smtp and pop just like Imail.
Title: Logged spam getting to mailbox
Current version does not fix this "folding" problem.
Declude is testing a newer version that may fix the problem, but no joy
yet.
Mattwrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 4:34 PMTo:
Ditto. We'd love to be able to do this.
In the interim, we've actually had success getting on Yahoo's good side by
contacting them.
We used the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get the process
started.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc
Title: Message
Ah, you mean using a magic marker to write
a visual stripe on the edge of the cards, right?
Bah, we just NEVER dropped our card
decks. Afterall, using columns 72 to 80 for sequence numbers was always for
wimps, right?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
The community support for
SmarterMail is much smaller (or at least quieter).
We are running one SM server for a client
and Ive posted several questions on the SM support forums and have not
received any responses at all.
Similar posts to Imail or Declude discussion
lists have always
I guess not everyone has had the pleasure of waiting in line for hours for
a printout (batch processing mainframes) to find just a few terse lines with
ABEND error xx and no other clue as to why the job failed.
That's why ABEND sticks in one's mind for many many years if you've had to
deal
A couple of things:
How to remove the mark as spam
menu items in webmail since they are meaningless when using an external spam
blocking preprocessor. The suggestion I got from support that in an
unsupported manner I could edit the aspx files, seemed partly
reasonable until I poked
Check out www.onebox.com (virtual receptionist). Combine it with vonage.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:23 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT:
does it cost?
-d
- Original Message -
From: Robert Grosshandler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP
Check out www.onebox.com (virtual receptionist). Combine it with vonage.
Rob
So now I guess the big question is if Declude 3.0.5.20 is compatible with
and ready for Imail 2006. Is there any official word on support? Robert
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe
ROTFL
A real-world example of the disconnect between the technologists building
all these tools and the reality of how much work sysadmins and the real
users have to go thru to deal with the limitations of current anti-spam
solutions.
And I assume, this is after the best tweaks and config
Hi,
I have a question for those of you that are using SmarterMail.
We are looking at the software to determine how we can link it to our user
creation process.
Currently, we have both classic asp (ASP not ASP.NET) and php scripts that
create users by POSTing to a form. The back-end of the form
in the Declude generated headers in
order to handle Blank Folding. IMO, Declude should just throw the headers
just before the location of the first CRLFCRLF or possibly following a
mistaken LFLF.
I haven't seen any Declude headers in the body using 2.0.6.16 and earlier.
Matt
Robert Grosshandler
I didn't even think this was possible. Does anyone know of a command line
utility that does this?
Robert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Rapaport
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 12:30 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE
Yup, plus logs, etc. Putting it out here in case anybody else is seeing
same thing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 7:33 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Other
Hi
The problem of the routeto happening before the subject line has been
altered still exists in this newest version.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
No changes to the configs from prior versions. It only mangles one in 100,
and only for e-mails that trigger lots of tests.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:02 PM
To:
Does this dual-processor issue affect system with HT (turned on)? Robert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:43 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re
I have one outstanding issue -- not stability
related.
We're seeing some messages that exceed our hold or delete
weights get routed to our hold or delete folders without having their subjects
altered (we prepend "spam" to the subject line). They route
ok.
It does look like maybe the
?
Robert, may I make a
suggestion?
Put all the logs into
debug mode. Allow it to run until you know this issue has occurred. Put the logs
back the way you had them.
Extract from the JM
log all the lines for a message in question. Send those along with the d and q
file to Declude support
Are these the suggested defaults?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:41 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Beta 3.0.4.4 Posted
Hi
Are there any spam or virus tests that belong in Imail, rather than letting
Declude JM or AV handle it?
I use Declude Pro / Sniffer / Inviurbl / 2 AV scanners.
For instance, the tarpitting that Imail can do looks like a good thing.
Thanks,
Rob
www.iGive.com
---
[This E-mail scanned for
Hi
You are using both Sniffer and the Invariant Systems URI tests together?
Maybe I was even denser than I thought, but I thought they sort of
duplicated each other.
Thanks,
Rob
snip on
We have learned over the past year, that most of the built-in tests of
Declude are not effective like
It was Imail and Declude.
Robert
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Woes
I see about 250,000 messages per day and I have 3000 accounts.
3.05ghz xeon
mail will be resent
to us later.
Thats about the best I can offer..
I have been looking for something better for some time now.
That one reason why I haven't upgraded.
Robert Whitaker
The Modem Pool
517-789-5689
1-888-377-5689
Be sure to try the New Web Express Internet Accelerator from
,
Robert
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mailing Lists
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 11:30
AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
[Declude.Virus] Brief Update
Bill,
does that mean days, weeks, months?
I
The first one is in Jacksonville Fla.
Second one in Dallas Tx.
Robert
- Original Message -
From:
J Porter
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
attack
Yep...The first one got me a couple
The second one also says NY NY
Hum...
Two locations for the same Net Block?
- Original Message -
From:
Richard
Farris
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 2:27
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
attack
FYI, I got slammed by
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
