Yep I did also.
Stu
At 08:47 AM 1/13/2006 -0500, you wrote:
Ummm... Did anybody else get a piece of spam this morning with subject
SPAMSPCE: that seems to have been relayed through Declude.com?
-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA
Does the Spamdomains tests use the mailfrom or the From: address to compare
to the revdns.
I'm betting it is the mailfrom address.
Thanks
Stu
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
I would definitely recommend message sniffer.
Stu
At 07:54 PM 3/21/2005 -0600, you wrote:
Thanks to both of you. I am looking to get mostly obscene stuff, but the
medical stuff would be very good to catch also. I will start with this and
then adventure out on my own:D
On a side note has
Marc,
I would be interested in these keys for some of the workstaions here if you
do not mind sharing them.
Thanks
Stu
At 05:46 PM 2/15/2005 -0500, you wrote:
If these are machines that the company owns and you can install them...
I have some Reg Keys that a guy who works under me wrote for
Is any one seeing Google and or Earthlink failing the subjectchars test on
blank subject lines or even if there is a subject typed in ?
Any one know of a reason for this.
Thanks
Stu
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came
Du..
Thanks Bill.
I now even remember making a note of this which in probably in the middle of
Christmas Bills.
Major brain fade today...
My apologies and thanks to all
Stu
At 10:09 AM 1/11/2005 -0800, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is any one
Matt,
Check this out http://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/index.lasso
The sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org is a combination of both the sbl.spamhaus.org data and
xbl.spamhaus.org data
You are checking some of the same data twice.
Stu
At 02:55 PM 07/06/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Hello All,
I am new to
Having done this (rename, move, zip) the Declude logfiles the tricky part is
dealing with the rollover of the logfile at midnight and at the end each month.
Stu
At 04:10 PM 06/30/2004 -0700, you wrote:
You could use something like:
LOGFILE spool\dec2004.log
I was hoping to
Scott,
With Declue removing the data between the in HTML messages to get the
correct wording. Deasdsdasdadlude = Declude.
Would a test that counts and/or totals the number of characters between a
single asd or all the aaa's in a message be a viable ne test.
I notice a fair amount of spam
Scott,
Can you give any idea when the next full release will be out and the
doccumentation updated? I'm primarly interested in the doccumentation of the
new features.
Searching the mail archive is ok but relying on mail-archive for information
can be difficult when they are upgrading or behind.
I would be interested in your script also.
Stu
At 08:27 AM 04/13/2004 -0700, you wrote:
I would be interested in your script until native support is added to
Declude.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In an effort to try and reduce the processing needed for checking mail.
With the new features in Declude to end or skip processing within a
filterfile does it seem better to have.
A) A small number of larger filer files vs a lot of smaller files
B) Doesn't make any significant difference if
Mark,
Try the same url with .zip instead of .txt
Stu
Matt,
Thanks for the response.
I did that but the newest file is just 2.0.1
I guessed you might have posted at:
http://www.mailpure.com/software/decludefilters/gibberish/Gibberish_v2-1-0.t
xt
but that spit back a 404
_
From:
I am here, I think :)
Stu
At 11:13 AM 07/31/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Optimists vs. Pessimists
Is the list up? Or is the list down?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Pereira
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott,
Would it be possible to have a variable like the %weight% variable say
%weight*% that would convert the weight into a series of stars based on a
set division number with the division number possibly held in the global.cfg
file.
This way only one x-header can be used rather than a series
Scott,
We will investigate this possibility, after seeing what else might be
possible currently. In this case, it looks like using LOGLEVEL HIGH
might be all that is needed, as that will add the phrase from the filter
file to the log file.
The problem with log level high is that log files
At 05:13 PM 04/01/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Now adding the phrase to the mid level in conjunction or in place of the
line number might work even if the phrase was limited to the first 10-15
characters. The line number would give the approx location and the first
part of the phrase could narrow it
Scott,
What information / location in the e-mail headers does Declude use for the
REVDNS test.
Does Declude use the DNS server in the global.cfg file to make the query ?
Thanks
Stu
-
CSOnline Technical Support hours -
Scott or anyone,
Looking to see if someone will confirm my thinking.
In trying to compare the IMail log files to the junkmail log files for some
stats.
Is it Correct that in an IMail - Declude JM combination
1) The IMail log files would show 5 SMTMD lines for each email
(connect, ehlo or
The (5) refers to the line number of the test in the filter file that failed.
Stu
At 12:05 PM 01/22/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I wanted to see if anyone new what the number meant behind the Filter
test failures when listed in the log file. For example: message failed
Filter_test (5) We are
We would be interested in this and currently are looking a putting something
like this together.
User goes to a web page enters e-mail address and selects filtering level
E-mail is sent to entered e-mail address for conformation
User just hits reply and sends an e-mail back
System process and
Scott,
Would it be possible to add a feature that would create a separate temp
debug log while maintaining the default log file.
Something likeLOGLEVELMID copy loglevel filename
Where if copy (or some key name) follows the primary settings a test logfile
would be created
Scott,
Rather than setting up diffrent domains on the gateway server is it possible
to get Declude to use the/a default (imail\declude\$default$.junkmail) file.
When set up without the specific domain all mail gets forwarded without JM
checking. With a domain configured
You are almost right on the HELOBOGUS test
The format for the HELOBOGUS test is
HELOBOGUS helovalid x x Y 0
Where Y = the weight
Stu
At 01:42 PM 07/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
I know all the beta enhancements don't make it to the manual and you can
find by
This is the knowledge base file for using IMail as a gateway.
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980116-DM01.htm
Stu
At 08:03 PM 06/18/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Mark, I was actually thinking about doing this. How is your Imail system
configured? I have never setup Imail as a gateway before.
Scott,
Maybe I misunderstood your comment but Eudora and Pegasus will filter on an
X-Header. Outlook and Outlook Express do not seem to allow for this. At
least I have not figured out how to do it.
Eudor does not include this as a default but you can add it. At least it
works with my version
How would the e-mail be handled that is (I'm assuming here) be held waiting
conformation?
If a valid conformation is received back then obviously the mail would be
delivered. How long for a conformation though and if a conformation bounces,
as expected, then what?
This idea sounds promising
So who's right and who's wrong here?
ORBZ for not changing the test or Lotus for not fixing a bug in their software?
In either case we loose another decent blacklist not because of some junk
mailer fighting for the right to send junk but a software issue in one program.
This would seem be a
Scott,
I have a customer using Exchange that would like us to do the JM filtering
for them. We do DNS for them so changing MX records and IMail relaying won't
be a problem and they have a 24x7 connection.
The questions is since the E-mail does come into IMail first am I correct
that Declude
Tom,
Using weight test(s) works very well for us.
You can have more than 1 weight test and at any weight. For give me for
stating the obvious if you already knew this.
Everybody has their own system and own ideas. One of the more common methods
is to have multiple weight tests with different
Scott,
The rest of the mail clients can filter on the X-RBL-Warning: header, if
the user sets it up.
We have done this with Eudora and Pegasus but have yet to find an option for
Outlook Express to do this. If you know this can be done with Outlook
Express I would be interested in the
Scott,
What ahould the affect be on Declude if there were a large number (hundreds,
thousands) of individual user.junkmail files.
Thanks
Stu
-
CSOnline Technical Support hours - Monday thru Saturday 7am - 1am
I'll add my .02 for a request of a to: (and or cc:) blacklist test similar
to the current From blacklist test.
Stu
At 03:26 PM 02/16/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Any way to add weight points to emails with
To: Undisclosed Recipients
as the recipient?
No, there is not any way to do that currently.
Mike,
Have you looked at the error code returned by the badheaders test in the logs ?
You can enter this code at http://www.declude.com/tools/header.php and
get an explanation of why the e-mail failed.
Stu
At 04:33 PM 02/13/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Can you tell me what the BadHeaders test
Should the %WEIGHT% Variable work with the SUBJECT action in 1.35a or 1.36.
I know it works other places but when I tried it in the sbject action it
didn't work.
Thanks
Stu
-
CSOnline Technical Support hours - Monday
I used it with 1.35a
WEIGHT15SUBJECT Junkmail Wt:%WEIGHT%
(Yes the quotes are part of the subject tag line)
The result was exactly that
Junkmail Wt:%WEIGHT%Viagra is Great
Stu
At 04:06 PM 02/01/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Should the %WEIGHT% Variable work with the
How about
BODYHEADER
BODYFOOTER
Stu
At 08:44 AM 01/31/2002 -0500, you wrote:
The HEADER action is misleading - it does not add a message to the header,
it adds it to the beginning of the body of the message. Your setup is
actually working as it was designed to. The manual is clear on this,
Harvy,
No you don't need to subscribe to MAPS to get Declude Junk Mail to work.
The decision on using MAPS (pay) vs the Free blacklists and/or Declude's
built in testing, Badheaders Spamheaders and so forth, is a matter of
personal decision and results of your testing. I do not use MAPS and am
Chris,
Using the weighting system in Declude JM (depending on how you set it up)
you should find in most cases anything failing 3-4 or more tests should give
you a very high degree of confindence it is spam in the 70-80% range you
mentioned.
Stu
At 08:36 PM 01/26/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Scott,
I don't think it was checked.
I located the Q file in the IMail Logs but it is not in the Declude log file.
I am checking the logs of some of the others that seem to have acted the
same way. So far at least one other Q file is listed in IMail but not in the
Declude logs.
Stu
At
Is it a correct assumption that if 4 weight tests are defined (weight5,
weight10, weight15, weight20) and the total weight is 18 only the weight15
test would get triped.
Stu
And, obviously, the WEIGHT test must somehow be postponed - because if it
was at the beginning of the globa.cfg file it
As usual when I assume something I am wrong :)
Stu
At 02:39 PM 01/16/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Is it a correct assumption that if 4 weight tests are defined (weight5,
weight10, weight15, weight20) and the total weight is 18 only the weight15
test would get triped.
No. If the total weight is 18,
42 matches
Mail list logo
