[389-12284720-012E] Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Missing Messages

2009-08-26 Thread Scush Sales Support
Hello, Please be aware we are receiving copies of the messages below which appear to contain privacy data. You may wish to switch to direct emails. Regards, Mike Scush Inc. scush.com Think green - don't print! From: declude.junkmail@declude.com

[Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2008-02-04 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [384-0F3A4F35-96D8]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within 24

[Declude.JunkMail] re: [0AC-0F2F1668-54D5] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2008-01-27 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [0AC-0F2F1668-54D5]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within 24

[Declude.JunkMail] re: [1A6-0F2F1667-8C86] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2008-01-27 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [1A6-0F2F1667-8C86]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within 24

[Declude.JunkMail] re: [32D-0F2E28E3-D4C1] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2008-01-26 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [32D-0F2E28E3-D4C1]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within 24

[Declude.JunkMail] re: [244-0F1D628C-258E] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2008-01-13 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [244-0F1D628C-258E]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within 24

[Declude.JunkMail] re: [35B-0EDF437D-8B7F] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2007-11-27 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [35B-0EDF437D-8B7F]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within 24

[Declude.JunkMail] re: [1CD-0E690ED8-5E5B] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2007-08-30 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [1CD-0E690ED8-5E5B]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within 24

[Declude.JunkMail] re: [37A-0DF9A964-4718] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2007-06-06 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [37A-0DF9A964-4718]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within 24

[Declude.JunkMail] re: [052-0DA5FA77-DED9] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2007-04-04 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [052-0DA5FA77-DED9]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within 24

[Declude.JunkMail] re: [325-0CD4C030-CDA5] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2006-10-27 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [325-0CD4C030-CDA5]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within

[Declude.JunkMail] re: [17B-0CC41FA9-5FDA] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2006-10-14 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [17B-0CC41FA9-5FDA]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-27 Thread Avolve Support
Try thinking in terms of a programming language and it will come to light. ;) Avolve Support Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless ! http://www.avolvewireless.net -- Original Message -- From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] does anyone punish email from these folks?

2005-12-27 Thread Avolve Support
We block them also as of 12-20-05 Avolve Support Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless ! http://www.avolvewireless.net -- Original Message -- From: Mike K @ NetDotCom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:02:46

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Avolve Support
for the way they play with mac addresses. We have the residential ata's in place and we use the nPBX versions of the service in the office over our wireless and it just flat out works great. Oh, well we can also resell it too, but so do a lot of people. It works great here. ;) Avolve Support Get High

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Avolve Support
. Avolve Support Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless ! http://www.avolvewireless.net -- Original Message -- From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:22:41 -0600 Hi Guys, I have a T-1 in my house

[Declude.JunkMail] Spoolfiles t's, d's, a's q's

2005-12-13 Thread Avolve Support
How do you get T, D or even A files to process with Declude if they are in the Imail spool directory. For kicks I rename a T file to a 'q' file and made the corresponding D file a 'd' file and placed them in the proc directory and I think they got delivered. So one would think that all T files

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Keyword

2005-11-28 Thread support
PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Keyword If you find your are holding mail because of a keyword, how do you find out which keyword it is? Richard FarrisEthixs Online1.270.247. Office1.800.548.3877 Tech Support"Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.06 with Imail 8.21

2005-09-13 Thread Avolve Support
Go back to 2.0.5 and change the time between retries and watch the overflow directory. Avolve Support Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless ! http://www.avolvewireless.net -- Original Message -- From: Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Fix/Update Above 2.0.6 ?

2005-07-26 Thread Avolve Support
Any word on the fix to stop the errors that have been cropping up with 2.0.6 and beta .16 with the latest Imail versions ? Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop blacklist Misdirected bounces

2005-04-12 Thread Technical Support
I just found out that our mail server has been blacklisted by spamcop, apparently for "Misdirected bounces" which seems to be nothing more than bouncing a message after first accepting it (I pasted Spamcop's explanation below). I'm running Imail v8.05 with declude v1.82, and I'm not sure

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] URI Blacklist External Program Beta Now Posted For Download

2004-12-28 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Fred, While invURIBL will catch a lot of SPAM - I still would recommend folks use Sniffer. The thing to keep in mind is that Sniffer triggers on many other aspects of SPAM other than URI data. Darrell Frederick Samarelli writes: It looks like it may be a redundant test to sniffer.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Overflow Directory

2004-12-15 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Has anyone had any success with bumping that up? If so, what values seemed to work for you? I know the big concern is hitting the mystery heap limit. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail/Declude queues backing up

2004-12-14 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
I have just spent the last 24 hours slowly feeding messages back into the message queue after queue manager quit delivering. It has happened before, and I have seen posts on the Imail list discussing queue manager hanging. The real problem is, the service is running, it just isn't doing anything.

[Declude.JunkMail] relays.visi.com down?

2004-12-13 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Does anyone know if relays.visi.com is officially down? I havent had a hit against it since early November. RSL - relays.visi.com Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.

[Declude.JunkMail] ed10.com - E-Dialog

2004-12-10 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Does anyone have any feedback on E-Dialog.com. It appears their are several reputable companies using them (NFL, Reuters, etc). Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: Syslog entries from Cisco ACL question

2004-12-08 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Rick, My understanding is if the packet is rejected or allowed before the port information is needed for comparison Cisco IOS will log it as port 0. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for

[Declude.JunkMail] Service Agreements

2004-12-01 Thread Junkmail Support
Hello, I seem to recall that the license code is based on the fqdn of the mail server. Wouldn't that mean that an individual license would be required for each server it is installed on in order to function? I also think that the updates covered by the service agreement are for all products

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log file locking???

2004-11-17 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Matt, It's possible its a locking issue. What specifically is the error message it is returning? I ran into similar issue with a log rotating script I wrote to move logs around into WebTrends. I was trying to rotate a log file still being downloaded and it would cause an issue. When I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Skipping test if weight exceeds x

2004-11-17 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Katie, SKIPIFWEIGHT only works in filter files and you will need the latest version of Declude to use this feature. From my experience DNS based tests and external tests are ran before the filter tests are ran. Most folks use the SKIPIFWEIGHT test to bypass CPU consuming filter files if the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this the correct format?

2004-11-11 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Kris, The syntax would be 66.54.138.0/24 Description Of Why Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Moving mail servers

2004-11-11 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Dean, The best thing to do is lower your TTL well ahead of time of the move. If you lower your TTL down to about 5 minutes on your records your cutover should not take that long for mail to cutover to your new IP. Also, make sure you get your PTR records added ahead of time. Also you have

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SPAMC32 (SpamAssassin SPAMC for Declude) 0.5.57 released

2004-11-05 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Darin, If its an unsigned 4-byte wouldnt it be 4,294,967,295 tests? Darrell Darin Cox writes: This is the same idea I mentioned a year ago when we were all talking about combo tests in Decludeonly problem being if you use more unique tests than the numeric type supported. Assuming the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels

2004-11-04 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Mark, You will lose some functionality on log level MID. I am not exactly sure which reports you are currently running, but if you check out http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/support.htm it will let you know which log levels are required for each specific report. If you need any

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels

2004-11-04 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Those are both great tools. My only complaint with BareTail is I get a lot of flicker under TS. However, their older wintail has no flicker... Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink Porn Spam

2004-11-01 Thread i360 Support
Thanks,,, H. - Original Message - From: Matt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 3:46 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink Porn Spam i360 Support wrote: I am still getting a ton of porn spam from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Little confused by these headers

2004-10-14 Thread Matthew Hiltner: oliveJar Support
Well this is silly. I guess it's not really a forged header. I was scanning mails that were tagged as spam and passed on, and the original of this was going to a stepindustries.net account. Only this specific user is having that mail all forwarded to an AOL account. Within AOL, she's marking

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Client TOS Notifications from AOL

2004-10-06 Thread support
Essentially someone received an email in their AOL acount and marked it as SPAM. Since you setup a feedback loop with AOL they will now send you every instance of an email that was reported as SPAM by one of their members. Darrell

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Citibank - phishing- still live

2004-10-05 Thread Matthew Hiltner: oliveJar Support
-mail recognition to their virus definitions. Both uvscan (NAI/McAfee) and the latest release candidates for ClamAV support phishing e-mail detection. Bill - Original Message - From: Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:22 AM Subject

[Declude.JunkMail] annoying spammer

2004-10-03 Thread i360 Support
We have been swamped with spam from United Email Marketing.Below is a list of IP addresses and domains used to send the crap.Sniffer does not catch them and I can't stop them.Does anyone have a solution on how to get rid of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 1.80

2004-09-27 Thread support
Scott, Also from the doc's it appears as if the bounce action has changed back to bounce from bounceonlyifyoumust. Is this correct or an error in the doc's? Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Help, I have been blacklisted

2004-09-13 Thread i360 Support
- Original Message - From: Bud Durland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 12:22 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Help, I have been blacklisted Richard Farris wrote: I have been delisted from SPAMCOP...whew...but I still am in the red with

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF tests not working right?

2004-09-12 Thread Matthew Hiltner: oliveJar Support
in my GLOBAL file, the tests are defines as follows: SPFPASSspfpassx-50 SPFFAILspffailx8 0 In $default$ SPFPASS warn SPFFAIL warn My problem is, while I do get several successful pass results, I have yet to get a fail result. How exactly is this test

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF tests not working right?

2004-09-12 Thread Matthew Hiltner: oliveJar Support
that giving much, or perhaps any, weight to SPF PASS may not be a good idea as some spammers have added SPF records. Darin. - Original Message - From: Matthew Hiltner: oliveJar Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 2:42 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread support
Harry, We have a utility to let you know how well a specific test does in our log parser (DLAnalyzer). The test is called the Test Breakdown Summary Report. Essentially you can pick a certain test(s) and see which other tests fail along with them. This report has helped us eliminate tests

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hitting the CPU Wall

2004-09-01 Thread support
Do any of these servers provide pop/imap/webmail services. We have a couple identical servers, but the ones that provide ancillary services tend to consume more CPU. For your type of volume it should be rare to see 25+ declude processes running at one time. From my experience when I have

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Information

2004-08-25 Thread support
If your looking for more of a histogram of the number of messgaes processed we have MRTG scripts that interface with Imail/Declude to provide you this information. This may or may not be what your looking for... Darrell Goran Jovanovic writes: Darrell I was hoping for more of a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] External Test for Subject is Upper Case

2004-08-24 Thread support
I would be curious to hear on this as well. It's my understanding that the non-english test in declude should catch this (chinese in the subject)? Why the need for an external test? Darrell Check out

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Attachment sizes

2004-08-04 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
David, We limit around 10MB. It has worked well. That not to say several folks havent tried to email 50+MB files.. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] There's no doom like MyDoom

2004-08-03 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
It is using yahoo to query for more email addresses. Here is Mcafee's write up. http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_127175.htm Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.

[Declude.JunkMail] Repost of 7/30

2004-08-02 Thread Junkmail Support
Hello all, I need some other (better) minds with this question. I host a domain (with email) that I have whitelisted both to from in the global.cfg file. The entries are: WHITELIST TODOMAIN @domain.com WHITELIST FROM @domain.com I also have an IPBlacklist test as follows: IPBlackList ipfile

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Repost of 7/30

2004-08-02 Thread Junkmail Support
Thanks Scott, I was second-guessing my understanding of the Whitelist entry and my IPBlacklist test. Mike - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 10:56 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Repost of 7/30 I host a

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting IPBlacklist Question

2004-07-30 Thread Junkmail Support
Hello all, I need some other (better) minds with this question. I host a domain (with email) that I have whitelisted both to from in the global.cfg file. The entries are: WHITELIST TODOMAIN @domain.com WHITELIST FROM @domain.com I also have an IPBlacklist test as follows: IPBlackList ipfile

[Declude.JunkMail] Message header review

2004-07-22 Thread i360 Support
Can someone help me with the header of this message. I think this came from earthlink.net mail server. According to earthlink abuse they can't do anything about this type of spam since it did not originate from their network. We get porn spam from this segement all the time.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message header review

2004-07-22 Thread i360 Support
to confirm if this server is just used for forwarding or what the case may be. It could be that this is an open relay, a forwarding server, or a full fledged mail server. I am guessing the first.Matti360 Support wrote: Can someone help me with the header of this message

[Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Uninstall

2004-07-09 Thread Junkmail Support
Hello all, The test seems to be stable on our system. However, I looked around and there are a couple of DLLs installed on C:\ProgramFiles\ComputerHorizons\MTLDB. One seems to indicate that it is cyphering or creating/using a secure token of some purpose. In scanning the regisrty, I also notice

[Declude.JunkMail] DLAnalyzer 3.0 Released (New Free Version Available)

2004-06-30 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Message Domain Suppression * Customized Advanced Report Output (HTML TEXT) * Advanced Report - Last Action Filter * Advanced Report - Weight Range Filter * SMTP Auth Support * SMTP Multiple To: Addresses * SMTP BCC: Addresses * SMTP CC: Addresses * GUI Configuration Utility Supports Multiple

[Declude.JunkMail] Spam sent to list

2004-06-29 Thread TCOnline Internet Support
Title: Message I was wondering if someone was posting this item to the list or if my e-mail address was harvest from somewhere. Isaias HernandezTC Online InternetSupport979-775-6239[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from declude.com [68.162.218.198] by mail.tconline.net with ESMTP

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Way OT: HTML code for tab

2004-06-29 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
John, It suppose to be #09; i.e. character code 09. Darrell - Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude and Imail. Now released QueueMon an Imail/Declude Queue Monitoring Application. John Tolmachoff (Lists)

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Spam Review

2004-06-17 Thread TCOnline Internet Support
if the held e-mails in hold2 are Spam or not. Also I wanted to get some opinions on how Spam Review is working for other people. Isaias Hernandez Internet Tech Support 979-775-6239 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Spam Review

2004-06-17 Thread TCOnline Internet Support
Yes I understand what Hijack is doing but I wanted to use Spam Review to easily view the e-mails and send back to the spool folder if they are valid instead of manually having to check each file individually. Isaias Hernandez Internet Tech Support 979-775-6239 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Content Rules plus/vs. Sniffer?

2004-06-17 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Andy, I know I am not Matt, but I wanted to chime in here. We have a lot of body filters and we use sniffer as well. Mostly because we can quickly code rules to block spam that is coming in at that momemnt instead of waiting for a rule base update. Also, not all of the spam we get ends up

[Declude.JunkMail] IP4R DNS lookup

2004-06-17 Thread TCOnline Internet Support
from being delivered or are there some false positives that may be caught?   Isaias Hernandez TC Online Internet Support 979-775-6239 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com

[Declude.JunkMail] TESTSFAILED END Question

2004-06-17 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
I seen this post below and wanted to implement the TESTSFAILED to exit out of one of my body filters based on if another test was already triggered. Is the below line correct (assuming REVERSEDNSFILTER is one of my filters that occurs before the filter I put the below line in)? TESTSFAILED

[Declude.JunkMail] RFC That Covers HELO BOGUS

2004-06-10 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Scott/Anyone, What is the RFC that covers HELO BOGUS? I had wrote down RFC 821 4.3. However, when looking at that sub heading it covers Sequencing of Commands and Replies. So I am thinking I must be wrong, because the only thing that I see relevant is the following lines Note: all the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail From Help

2004-06-10 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
I am sure this may just be a typo but you put CONTRAINS opposed to CONTAINS? Darrell - Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude and Imail. Kris McElroy writes: I am wanting to block anything in the From line

[Declude.JunkMail] MRTG For Declude and IMAIL

2004-04-26 Thread support
If anyone is interested in using MRTG with Declude or Imail we have made available the program(s)that we are using to graph statistics. For Declude Junkmail * Graph A Test / Total Incoming Messages To Declude Junkmail For Imail * Total Incoming Connections * Incoming Connections For a domain /

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: ASCII code

2004-04-21 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Correct... Darrell John Tolmachoff (Lists) writes: A space is %20, correct? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.

[Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish and Anti-Gibberish Testing

2004-04-14 Thread TC Online Support
if there was a way to skip the Anti-Gibberish Test if the Gibberish is not triggered. (This goes to all the test that contain an Anti- test) Isaias Hernandez Internet Tech Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ARGOLINKs SPAM Graph

2004-04-14 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Terry, I orginally looked at the argolink spam graph, but as the doc's mentioned it goes through the full log file from beginning to end. Our log files are big, but it would tie up the cpu for a bit ~10-15 minutes. We just finished a seperate program that can be used with MRTG to graph

[Declude.JunkMail] e-commerce counter weights

2004-03-29 Thread Technical Support
with that spammers don't already try to fake. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you for making YourNET Connection your connection to the world Jim O'Keefe Technical Support @YourNET Connection, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Windows 2000 Performance Monitor

2004-03-17 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Matt, I monitor a bunch of counters (memory, cpu, process, disk, network, etc) on our servers. I roll the perf logs on a daily basis. The hard thing in tracking this stuff is that when you add process counters there is no way to track all of the individual processes for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cheap router to limit by IP

2004-03-13 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Matt, I used to put routers in these types of situations, but now I don't. I would suggest you/your customer look at some of the low end Netscreen firewalls like a 5GT. You can get these under $500 and they have way more value than a router.. One of the best things about the netscreen

[Declude.JunkMail] Server Recommendation

2004-03-12 Thread TC Online Support
just wanted to see if this is normal for an ISP. Isaias Hernandez Internet Tech Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Server Recommendation

2004-03-12 Thread TC Online Support
commented out were the ones provided by mailpure.com (Gibberish, Y!directed, etc). Are these tests really worth having to test for SPAM or can they be removed? Isaias Hernandez Internet Tech Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] We are currently looking to upgrade our mail server. Lately the processing

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Server Recommendation

2004-03-12 Thread TC Online Support
in the 32-bit mode. I was under the impression it was already running in this mode. Can someone post the command line used to run f-prot in the 32-bit mode or send me an e-mail directly? Thanks. Isaias Hernandez Internet Tech Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

[Declude.JunkMail] test gfdsghb

2004-03-10 Thread TC Online Support
nfdhgfgf Isaias Hernandez Internet Tech Support 979-775-6239 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

[Declude.JunkMail] wrong hop?

2004-03-03 Thread Technical Support
-Warning: HELOBOGUS: Domain pal01 returns a server failure for MX or A records. Why did it run on pal01? Shouldn't it run on mail.webagency.net? Thank you for making YourNET Connection your connection to the world Jim O'Keefe Technical Support @YourNET Connection, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] wrong hop?

2004-03-03 Thread Technical Support
HOP 1 and I don't have any IPBYPASS, I have it commented out. I also have HOPHIGH commented out. Thank you for making YourNET Connection your connection to the world Jim O'Keefe Technical Support @YourNET Connection, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS timeout and DNS configuration - does it get logged?

2004-02-26 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
DNS line in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file). Note that it is recommended (with or without Declude) that you only use 1 DNS server in the IMail SMTP settings. What types of problems tend to crop up with multiple DNS servers listed in Imail? Darrell --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

[Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
We are setup currently using HOPHIGH 1. With using a HOPHIGH setting of 1. What we are seeing is an increase in messages that are gettng caught with XBL, DSBL, SORBS, and other tests along this line on the second HOP even though they were legit messages that were sent through normal ISP

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
a domain from the MAILFROM instead of the hops, so you don't need to do anything special with these tests. Matt DLAnalyzer Support wrote: We are setup currently using HOPHIGH 1. With using a HOPHIGH setting of 1. What we are seeing is an increase in messages that are gettng caught with XBL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
and that helps with forwarding). I've only seen a few FP's as a result of tagged zombies sending legit E-mail, maybe a couple a week and always just barely failing. Note that all of these scored are based on a hold weight of 10 or 13. Matt DLAnalyzer Support wrote: Matt, Thats

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo, Sendmail to test antispam system

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Actually, Bill announced today at the RAS conference that Windows XP SP2 should fix the virus issue. Beyond the Windows service release, Gates also showed off ``active protection technologies'' that will gird Windows computers against attacks by sensing changes in the network that indicate

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature-itis

2004-02-23 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
the information gets discarded as unusable. It would be nice to have syslogging as a feature. However, it may not be very easy to integrate syslogging support into Declude. I am curious to know if the majoriety of folks would prefer that the focus of the developer(s) be maintained

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting and SPAM

2004-02-18 Thread TC Online Support
was sent from user98.net270.lv.sprint-hsd.net ([208.17.78.98]). X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Isaias Hernandez Internet Tech Support 979-775-6239 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting and SPAM

2004-02-18 Thread TC Online Support
is if one of our customers is whitelisted, is everyone receiving this message going to be receiving the whitelisted message? If so, is there a way to whitelist only that one customer and not the other messages that are going to other users? Isaias Hernandez Internet Tech Support 979-775-6239 [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish filter not working

2004-02-14 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Todd, Yes we do have a version that is compatible with the new log file changes. You need to download 2.0.6R. Darrell Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com Todd writes:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do I stop the reply to potentialvirus senders?

2004-02-05 Thread Avolve Support
scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] -- Avolve Support Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless ! http://www.avolvewireless.net -- --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com

[Declude.JunkMail] Keyword filtering AND Aliases

2004-02-05 Thread TC Online Support
by whitelisting the domains but I was just wondering if there was a better way to do this instead of whitelisting. Sorry for the vagueness of the second question. Isaias Hernandez Internet Tech Support 979-775-6239 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] **OT** Intrusion Detection Software

2004-02-04 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Snort... darrell Sharyn Schmidt writes: I have been asked to research Intrusion Detection Software. I have done a Google search, but most of what I see is an actual appliance. All I am looking for is software that will notify me when something suspicious attempts to hit our network.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation

2004-01-31 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Todd, Dotster.com has always been good to us. Darrell Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com Todd writes: Anyone using a registrar that they like? I want to get some of my

[Declude.JunkMail] Best Test for SPAM from AOL, Yahoo

2004-01-28 Thread TC Online Support
. Also are there any other tests that can be done to stop the amount of SPAM sent to our uses. 80%-90% of our network traffic is incoming SPAM and much is going through. Thanks, Isaias Hernandez TC Online Internet Tech Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Test for SPAM from AOL, Yahoo

2004-01-28 Thread TC Online Support
posting your global.cfg? Redact whatever you want private. With that maybe some good suggestions can be made -Nick Hayer From: TC Online Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt

2004-01-15 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Winzip has a command line utility add in. Darrell ISPhuset Nordic AS writes: Hi a little off topic Anyone knowing off a free or nearly free zip utility which can pack some files to a zip archive. unpacking isn't a problem It is a must that it can run for a command prompt Benny ---

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt

2004-01-15 Thread Hosting Support
winzip is only $29...and the command line add-on is free to registered users. Darin. - Original Message - From: ISPhuset Nordic AS [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 8:13 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt Hi a little off

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt

2004-01-15 Thread Hosting Support
to distribute this on 150 boxes and that is a lot of licenses :-) so free or nearly free are the keyword here -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DLAnalyzer Support Sent: 15. januar 2004 14:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail

[Declude.JunkMail] DLAnalyzer - Update Available For The New Log File Changes

2004-01-13 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
For those who have downloaded/currently using DLAnalyzer to process thier Declude Junkmail Logs an update is available that supports the new log file format found in 1.77i15+. It is also backward compatible and will still continue to work with the older log files as well. Please see the read

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] *OT* Web dns management console

2004-01-13 Thread Hosting Support
Hi Nick, I put together a simple one in .NET for MS DNS that uses SQL2K and the dnscmd utility to manage the most common functions in DNS (adding, deleting Host and MX records). Note that it does currently require IIS, the .NET framework, and SQL2K on the MS DNS server. If you're interested, we

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] *OT* Web dns management console

2004-01-13 Thread Hosting Support
hosting users can get access to the simple things like adding and deleting , and collocated customers can perform somewhat more advanced tasks like MX and common host (www, ftp, mail, etc.) record management. Overall, it saves us a small amount of support time and makes some of our customers happy

  1   2   3   >