RE: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-20 Thread Kami Razvan
, March 19, 2003 8:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released I personally would like to see some examples and more details on how to implement new test when you email a notice like this announcing them. That's what this list

Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, just wondering why these new tests use * instead of x for the undefined variables. I tried using x and the results were not good. I haven't tried using * yet, but will if that is what the undefined variables should be for these new tests. You can actually use anything there as

RE: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
I am curious what is the rational for using LongSubject test. I am curious as to why this test could be found useful? It was added at the request of one of our customers, who was able to show that it might be useful. Clearly, it wouldn't work well on its own, but it may be useful as part of

Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
WARNING do not use the new test SUBJECTSPACES On my system is causes Declude.exe to load and stay loaded in the task manager using 100% of the CPU time causing my computer to come to a stop. This has been fixed for an interim release 1.68i1 at http://www.declude.com/release/168i/declude.exe .

Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-20 Thread David Dodell
This has been fixed for an interim release 1.68i1 at http://www.declude.com/release/168i/declude.exe . It is recommended This link doesn't appear to be working. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
This has been fixed for an interim release 1.68i1 at http://www.declude.com/release/168i/declude.exe . It is recommended This link doesn't appear to be working. Whoops, it's there now. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-20 Thread David Fletcher
: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released I personally would like to see some examples and more details on how to implement new test when you email a notice like this announcing them. That's what this list

Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-20 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released Scott, just wondering why these new tests use "*" instead of "x" for theundefined variables. I tried using "x" and the results were not good. Ihaven't tried using "*" yet, but will if th

Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
What is the latest version of Declude Console and from where do I get it? The link is http://www.declude.com/release/168/deccon.exe . Can a link for that be added to the JunkMail manual? It isn't officially part of Declude JunkMail (yet?), which is why the link isn't there.

Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-20 Thread Dan Patnode
] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released I personally would like to see some examples and more details on how to implement new test when you email a notice like this announcing them

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
We have just released Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta). See http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm . Notable changes since the last beta include: o Fixes an issue where the 'comments' test type would catch comments that shouldn't have been caught. o MAILFROM and HELOBOGUS

Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-19 Thread William Baumbach
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 6:23 PM Subject: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released We have just released Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta). See http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm . Notable changes since the last beta include: o Fixes

Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
I personally would like to see some examples and more details on how to implement new test when you email a notice like this announcing them. That's what this list is for. :) The nonenglish test type will detect E-mails that are not in English (specifically, ones that are using foreign

Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-19 Thread William Baumbach
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:14 PM Subject: Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released I personally would like to see some examples and more details on how to implement new test when you email a notice like this announcing them. That's what

RE: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-19 Thread Ren LeVally
Same thing here -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Baumbach Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released WARNING do not use the new test

Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released

2003-03-19 Thread Bill Landry
Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 5:14 PM Subject: Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released I personally would like to see some examples and more details on how to implement new test when you email a notice like this announcing