RE: [Declude.JunkMail] End of headers {was - declude not modifying subject line}

2006-11-09 Thread Kevin Bilbee
OK sounds reasonable. Since you are the expert and I am trying to understand. Have you ever seen a legitimate message with a no real end of headers, where the two line terminators designating the end of headers are separated by more than white space, tab or space characters? Kevin

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] End of headers {was - declude not modifying subject line}

2006-11-09 Thread Herb Guenther
What about a brute force rule "I am appending a header more than x characters from the beginning of a y length message so this cannot be a correctly formatted message" and you have set the "deletebadforematmail" switch to "Yes" so delete. Herb Kevin Bilbee wrote: OK sounds reasonable.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] End of headers {was - declude not modifying subject line}

2006-11-09 Thread Mike N
 I've seen some messages with dozens of Kbytes of CC and TO E-mail lists that would fail this test. - Original Message - From: Herb Guenther To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 3:30 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] End of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] End of headers {was - declude not modifying subject line}

2006-11-09 Thread Herb Guenther
Hi Mike; I'm sure that you are correct, but it would have to be both malformed and have the large header.  Right now there are hundreds of messages a day slipping thru that are not being addressed at all.  This MAY be a way to get the vast majority of them without the apparent difficulty of