I see many ways to adjust levels of logging, is there any way to
temporarily turn it off to save processing power?
The best option in this case, if you are sure that you do not want logging,
is to use LOGLEVEL WARN. This will only report warnings and errors to
the log file, which you really
I see many ways to adjust levels of logging, is there any
way to temporarily turn it off to save processing power?
Thanks,
Chris Patterson, CCNA
Network Engineer
Rapid Systems
(813)232-4887 Ext. 112
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Managed Spam Filtering
and Anti-Virus Protection for Your
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Patterson
Sent: Monday, April
05, 2004 5:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Is it
possible to turn logging off?
I see many ways to adjust levels of logging, is there any
way to temporarily turn it off to save processing power?
Thanks,
Chris
Built a filter:
SUBJECT -30 CONTAINS tunafish
Doesn't trigger.
BODY -30 CONTAINS tunafish
Triggers fine.
It could very well be me, but if so, I'm stumped as to why.
Rob
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Sorry for false alarm, but I couldn't recreate this myself. Working now.
Rob
===
Built a filter:
SUBJECT -30 CONTAINS tunafish
Doesn't trigger.
BODY -30 CONTAINS tunafish
Triggers fine.
It could very well be me, but if so, I'm stumped as to why.
Rob
---
Is it possible to hide not write this to the mailheader ?
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-RBL-Warning: ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent with spam
Is it possible to hide not write this to the mailheader ?
X-RBL-Warning: ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent
with spam [210f].
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [148.122.161.44]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for
spam.
I have a strange request, however, I don't think it can be done. I have
a store-and-forward domain (Exchange User) that would like for us to
forward individual spam email to another location for each individual
user. The catch is, they don't want to send us their individual user
email addresses
Declude does a great job of creating sub-folders on the fly for on
the box Imail users, however, this is more on the fly creation of
Imail main boxes,
...which to me is dangerous since spammers could send email to any
ole' user...
Well, they can already send mail to any old user,
I want to either delete or send to a specified mailbox all mail for a list
of recipients.
I manage about 250 users between 2 different domains, and because we are a
wholesale salesman based company we have chosen to use the nobody alias so
all misaddressed mail is routed to one mailbox. We get
Dan,
Monday, November 11, 2002 you wrote:
DS I want to either delete or send to a specified mailbox all mail
DS for a list of recipients.
DS Is this possible using declude filters?
Yes, but I believe it would require a custom external test. As far as
I know there is no declude test that traps
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Smart Business
Lists
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:44 AM
To: Dan Spangenberg
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter
function or blacklist?
Dan,
Monday, November 11, 2002 you wrote
Scott, any chance of doing this with the existing filters or adding a
location - To: for the filter to look? Or possibly getting a blacklist To:
function?
There is actually a ALLRECIPS filter option in v1.62 that now allows you to
filter based on recipients.
One option (with Declude JunkMail
R.,
Monday, November 11, 2002 you wrote:
RSP ALLRECIPS filter option in v1.62
Is that documented somewhere and I just missed it?
How does it work?
Terry Fritts
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
RSP ALLRECIPS filter option in v1.62
Is that documented somewhere and I just missed it?
Whoops -- it looks like it didn't get added to the release notes for 1.62.
How does it work?
It works as one of the filter options; for example:
ALLRECIPS 100 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter
function or blacklist?
Scott, any chance of doing this with the existing
Dan,
Monday, November 11, 2002 you wrote:
DS Would I need to put the entire email addy?
Not necessarily.
DS And is it only going to look at the entire thing or will it find user or
DS r2 out of the above examples?
ALLRECIPS would have to match exactly with IS.
DS Wouldn't the IS
So there is two ways to do this, filters and per user config?
That is correct.
If I used a Filter file like this:
ALLRECIPS 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ALLRECIPS 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would I need to put the entire email addy?
Actually, you would need to use:
ALLRECIPS 0 CONTAINS
Scott,
I am trying out the per user config and trying the catchallmails function.
I can only get it to work if there is a valid imail user. If there is no
imail user then the email is still getting routed to my root directory where
the misaddressed mail goes. I was hoping to be able to have it
I am trying out the per user config and trying the catchallmails function.
I can only get it to work if there is a valid imail user. If there is no
imail user then the email is still getting routed to my root directory where
the misaddressed mail goes. I was hoping to be able to have it work
Title: Message
Going back to the
discussion on Junkmail?
Is it possible to
simply have a list for "Check First" and then deliver domains that users with
that domain will have their userID checked for validity
first.
If we can check
the domains of Hotmail, and Yahoo first and see if they
Is it possible to simply have a list for Check First and then deliver
domains that users with that domain will have their userID checked for
validity first.
If we can check the domains of Hotmail, and Yahoo first and see if they
exist before delivering their message our traffic will fall
22 matches
Mail list logo