Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is it possible to turn logging off?

2004-04-06 Thread R. Scott Perry
I see many ways to adjust levels of logging, is there any way to temporarily turn it off to save processing power? The best option in this case, if you are sure that you do not want logging, is to use LOGLEVEL WARN. This will only report warnings and errors to the log file, which you really

[Declude.JunkMail] Is it possible to turn logging off?

2004-04-05 Thread Chris Patterson
I see many ways to adjust levels of logging, is there any way to temporarily turn it off to save processing power? Thanks, Chris Patterson, CCNA Network Engineer Rapid Systems (813)232-4887 Ext. 112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Managed Spam Filtering and Anti-Virus Protection for Your

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is it possible to turn logging off?

2004-04-05 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Patterson Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 5:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Is it possible to turn logging off? I see many ways to adjust levels of logging, is there any way to temporarily turn it off to save processing power? Thanks, Chris

[Declude.JunkMail] 1.78 beta possible bug

2004-02-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Built a filter: SUBJECT -30 CONTAINS tunafish Doesn't trigger. BODY -30 CONTAINS tunafish Triggers fine. It could very well be me, but if so, I'm stumped as to why. Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.78 beta possible bug - NOT

2004-02-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Sorry for false alarm, but I couldn't recreate this myself. Working now. Rob === Built a filter: SUBJECT -30 CONTAINS tunafish Doesn't trigger. BODY -30 CONTAINS tunafish Triggers fine. It could very well be me, but if so, I'm stumped as to why. Rob ---

[Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible

2003-11-26 Thread ISPHuset Nordic
Is it possible to hide not write this to the mailheader ? X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-RBL-Warning: ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent with spam

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible

2003-11-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is it possible to hide not write this to the mailheader ? X-RBL-Warning: ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent with spam [210f]. X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [148.122.161.44] X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for spam.

[Declude.JunkMail] Is it possible

2003-09-22 Thread Keith Johnson
I have a strange request, however, I don't think it can be done. I have a store-and-forward domain (Exchange User) that would like for us to forward individual spam email to another location for each individual user. The catch is, they don't want to send us their individual user email addresses

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is it possible

2003-09-22 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Declude does a great job of creating sub-folders on the fly for on the box Imail users, however, this is more on the fly creation of Imail main boxes, ...which to me is dangerous since spammers could send email to any ole' user... Well, they can already send mail to any old user,

[Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
I want to either delete or send to a specified mailbox all mail for a list of recipients. I manage about 250 users between 2 different domains, and because we are a wholesale salesman based company we have chosen to use the nobody alias so all misaddressed mail is routed to one mailbox. We get

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread Smart Business Lists
Dan, Monday, November 11, 2002 you wrote: DS I want to either delete or send to a specified mailbox all mail DS for a list of recipients. DS Is this possible using declude filters? Yes, but I believe it would require a custom external test. As far as I know there is no declude test that traps

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Smart Business Lists Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:44 AM To: Dan Spangenberg Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist? Dan, Monday, November 11, 2002 you wrote

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filterfunction or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, any chance of doing this with the existing filters or adding a location - To: for the filter to look? Or possibly getting a blacklist To: function? There is actually a ALLRECIPS filter option in v1.62 that now allows you to filter based on recipients. One option (with Declude JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread Smart Business Lists
R., Monday, November 11, 2002 you wrote: RSP ALLRECIPS filter option in v1.62 Is that documented somewhere and I just missed it? How does it work? Terry Fritts --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filterfunction or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
RSP ALLRECIPS filter option in v1.62 Is that documented somewhere and I just missed it? Whoops -- it looks like it didn't get added to the release notes for 1.62. How does it work? It works as one of the filter options; for example: ALLRECIPS 100 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist? Scott, any chance of doing this with the existing

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread Smart Business Lists
Dan, Monday, November 11, 2002 you wrote: DS Would I need to put the entire email addy? Not necessarily. DS And is it only going to look at the entire thing or will it find user or DS r2 out of the above examples? ALLRECIPS would have to match exactly with IS. DS Wouldn't the IS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filterfunction or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
So there is two ways to do this, filters and per user config? That is correct. If I used a Filter file like this: ALLRECIPS 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED] ALLRECIPS 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Would I need to put the entire email addy? Actually, you would need to use: ALLRECIPS 0 CONTAINS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Scott, I am trying out the per user config and trying the catchallmails function. I can only get it to work if there is a valid imail user. If there is no imail user then the email is still getting routed to my root directory where the misaddressed mail goes. I was hoping to be able to have it

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filterfunction or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
I am trying out the per user config and trying the catchallmails function. I can only get it to work if there is a valid imail user. If there is no imail user then the email is still getting routed to my root directory where the misaddressed mail goes. I was hoping to be able to have it work

[Declude.JunkMail] Is it possible?

2002-05-23 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message Going back to the discussion on Junkmail? Is it possible to simply have a list for "Check First" and then deliver domains that users with that domain will have their userID checked for validity first. If we can check the domains of Hotmail, and Yahoo first and see if they

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is it possible?

2002-05-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is it possible to simply have a list for Check First and then deliver domains that users with that domain will have their userID checked for validity first. If we can check the domains of Hotmail, and Yahoo first and see if they exist before delivering their message our traffic will fall