Re: [Declude.JunkMail] NEw tests runs for all email

2004-06-24 Thread R. Scott Perry
The problem is as soon as I save GLOBAL.CFG the test runs for all inbound mail not just the one juser.junkmail file I added it to. That is just the way that Declude JunkMail works -- the tests will be run for all users (for example, in many cases, people define tests in the global.cfg file

[Declude.JunkMail] NEw tests runs for all email

2004-06-24 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
I'm in the process of creating a custom test. To test that I've got the correct calls to it, it currently just creates a unique named file and writes the command line arguments to it. It defined as an EXTERNAL test and I have added the the following line to GLOBAL.CFG MPALERT EXTERNAL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] NEw tests runs for all email

2004-06-24 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
OK. Is there anyway around this, perhaps by defining the test in a domain $default$.junkmail or individual's .junkmail file? I wonder why we put anything in the .junkmail files if all the tests in GLOBAL.CFG are run any. Not to pick-nits, it is just that I'm still pretty new to this and been

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] NEw tests runs for all email

2004-06-24 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Roderick A. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:43 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] NEw tests runs for all email OK. Is there anyway around this, perhaps by defining the test in a domain

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] NEw tests runs for all email

2004-06-24 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there anyway around this, perhaps by defining the test in a domain $default$.junkmail or individual's .junkmail file? No (not that I am aware of, at least -- some people have done some very creative things with Declude JunkMail, but I doubt this can be accomplished). I wonder why we put

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] NEw tests runs for all email

2004-06-24 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
Message - From: Roderick A. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:43 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] NEw tests runs for all email OK. Is there anyway around this, perhaps by defining the test in a domain $default$.junkmail or individual's

[Declude.JunkMail] New Tests

2004-05-28 Thread Karl Hentschel
This question has probably already been posted before. Is there a list anywhere that lists all the new tests in the beta versions that aren't listed in the manual of the release? For example DOW and SPF. Is there any easier way to find the documentation for these test other than looking through

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New Tests

2004-05-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
This question has probably already been posted before. Is there a list anywhere that lists all the new tests in the beta versions that aren't listed in the manual of the release? For example DOW and SPF. Is there any easier way to find the documentation for these test other than looking through

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] New Tests?

2003-02-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
CYBERsitter, now known as SpamManager, is being beta tested by a number of us with excellent results. It is coming close to being released. Some information may be found here, www.spammanager.com. Hey, SPAManager's my trademark! No fair! :)) -Sandy

[Declude.JunkMail] New Tests?

2003-02-04 Thread David Sullivan
I have been off this list for a while and just noticed two new tests in Scott's spam stats post to the Imail forum. Can anyone tell me where to get more info on the CYBERSITTER and MAILDEFLECTOR tests? I checked Cybersitter's site and couldn't find anything. Is anyone using these tests much?

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New Tests?

2003-02-04 Thread John Tolmachoff
CYBERsitter, now known as SpamManager, is being beta tested by a number of us with excellent results. It is coming close to being released. Some information may be found here, www.spammanager.com. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835