Gotta agree. The rblpolicyd functionality is rare at the
free/low-cost price point, and new and untested even on
*nix (though sa-exim has been able to do the same for
Exim for a couple of years, a kind of weird latency if you ask me).
Sandy, I'll hazard a guess that this module has
Sandy, I'll hazard a guess that this module has taken a while
because RBL weighting could already be done within SpamAssassin,
which is nearly ubiquitous. What do you think?
It's the inline, envelope-level part that I'm talking about, which
sa-exim can do by shelling to SA
Is there a box I can put in front of my Imail
server that will help take some of the load off of the spam filtering that
Declude is doing
Richard FarrisEthixs
Online1.270.247. Office1.800.548.3877 Tech Support"Crossroads to
a Cleaner Internet"
Richard Farris wrote:
Is there a box I can put in front of my Imail server that will help take
some of the load off of the spam filtering that Declude is doing
IMGate. http://imgate.meiway.com/
I'm seeing a reduction in rejected messages with no reduction in
delivered mail.
This
Richard Farris wrote:
Is there a box I can put in front of
my Imail server that will help take some of the load off of the spam
filtering that Declude is doing
Hi Richard -
One method is to put ORF in front of your IMail box and via its
recipients blacklist feature refuse
@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Spam box
Richard Farris wrote:
Is there a box I can put in front of my Imail server
that will help take some of the load off of the spam filtering that Declude is
doing
Hi Richard -
One method is to put ORF in front of your IMail box and via its
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Thursday, August
04, 2005
1:43 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Spam box
Richard Farris wrote
- Original Message -
From:
Goran
Jovanovic
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 2:10
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
box
I have a question
about these boxes that go in front of Declude, be they IMGATE or ORF
box
- Original Message -
From:
Goran
Jovanovic
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 2:10
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
box
I have a question
about these boxes that go in front
Thanx
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Thursday, August
04, 2005
1:43 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Spam box
Richard Farris wrote:
Is t
solution - depending on the circumstance.
-Nick
Andrew 8)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill
Landry
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 2:27 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam box
next build of Declude Junkmail 2.x that will co-exist happily with
IMail 8.2x
Andrew 8)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 2:58 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
box
Goran a
ubject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Spam box
Richard Farris wrote:
Is there a box I can put
in front of my Imail server
that will help take some of the load off of the spam filtering that
Declude is
doing
Hi Richard -
One method is to put ORF in front of your
:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Spam box
Hi Andrew -
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Also,
I'd be a little skeptical that ORF would do the job for
Goran, as he is basically
an ISP for
multiple organizations.
Common :) Don't be so
negative..
He would
need extracts from their GALs for
each organization
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Thursday, August
04, 2005
6:10 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Spam box
Hi Andrew -
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Also,
I'd be a little skeptical
- Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 3:18
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
box
One other note to add to this.ORF plugs-into MS SMTP. I
have unfortunately found that MS SMTP doesn't appear
attachments.
Matt
Bill Landry wrote:
- Original Message -
From:
Matt
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent:
Thursday, August 04, 2005 3:18 PM
Subject:
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam box
One other note to add to this.
ORF plugs
.
Evans Martin
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005
4:10 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Spam box
I have a question about these boxes that
go in front of Declude
Sandy,
FYI, restarting ORF doesn't affect MS SMTP as far as I can tell, and as
long as you configure MS SMTP to accept all E-mail, all that a restart
of ORF will do is cause a moment of un-validated E-mail which should
get deleted by Declude as spam if it came from a dictionary attack.
The
FYI, restarting ORF doesn't affect MS SMTP as far as I can tell, and
as long as you configure MS SMTP to accept all E-mail, all that a
restart of ORF will do is cause a moment of un-validated E-mail
which should get deleted by Declude as spam if it came from a
dictionary
20 matches
Mail list logo
