Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam out of 86.* 87.*

2006-02-28 Thread Franco Celli
, February 27, 2006 10:33 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam out of 86.* 87.* You've got a lot of European DUL space in 86.* and 87.*. interbusiness.it , chello.pl , chello.fr, versanet.de, wanadoo.fr, ntl.com, btcentralplus.com. So anything that target Zombies should help

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam out of 86.* 87.*

2006-02-28 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi John, What is my best bet - jack up the score a number of points for any mail coming from 86 87? Many of the messages hardly trip any of the regular tests. Wouldn't hurt - use blackholes.us and maybe score 40% of your hold weight? I would say though blocking a /8 is not a good idea.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam out of 86.* 87.*

2006-02-28 Thread John Carter
trip the tag weight. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 9:22 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam out of 86.* 87.* Hi John, What is my best bet - jack up

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam out of 86.* 87.*

2006-02-28 Thread Scott Fisher
28, 2006 10:20 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam out of 86.* 87.* Thanks, will look at blackholes.us. My real problem is time. I've written a program and spreadsheet that extracts the domains and IP's of delivered messages and shows the unique IP's and how many messages came from them

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam out of 86.* 87.*

2006-02-27 Thread Scott Fisher
@declude.com Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 3:09 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam out of 86.* 87.* I am getting hammered by spam out 86.0.0.0/8 and 87.0.0.0/8; none of the addresses being registered to email servers according to SenderBase. All have faked domains (of course) but go back to RIPE