[Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2006-01-06 Thread smb
Does the Spamdomains tests use the mailfrom or the From: address to compare to the revdns. I'm betting it is the mailfrom address. Thanks Stu --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2006-01-06 Thread David Franco-Rocha
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 10:50 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test Does the Spamdomains tests use the mailfrom or the From: address to compare to the revdns. I'm betting it is the mailfrom address. Thanks Stu --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-28 Thread Larry Craddock
Thanks Bill. I checked the archives and found one from Nov.28,2003 ... just got it setup. thanks again, Larry Craddock - Original Message - From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:34 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

[Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-27 Thread Larry Craddock
I think I need a little more detail on the spamdomains test. Here's the entire explanation from the manual: [This test will catch E-mail that is not coming from a mailserver that it should be coming from. This test will only work if you set up a file listing domains that you wish to be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
But I'm sure I've seen discussion someplace with reference to lines containing more than just a domain name in the spamdomains.txt file ... or is that all that's needed besides enabling the test? That's a new feature, that allows you to have an alias (for lack of a better word) that can be

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
So a line example.com would require that any E-mail address from @example.com must have a reverse DNS entry containing example.com. However, if legitimate @example.com E-mail can also be sent from @example.net, then you could have a line example.com example.net. Scott, any thoughts

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-27 Thread Matt
Using the dnsbl type of test and a custom zone, you could extend this through DNS. For instance: MPBL-SPAMDOMAINS dnsbl %REVDNS%.%RHSBL%.spamdomains.example.com 127.0.0.2 4 0 In your custom zone, you could construct records like so: *.aol.com.aol.comA 127.0.0.1 TXT ( "Good

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-27 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Using the dnsbl type of test and a custom zone, you could extend this through DNS. For instance: MPBL-SPAMDOMAINS dnsbl%REVDNS%.%RHSBL%.spamdomains.example.com 127.0.0.240 Interesting idea, Matt. Still way too much management compared to SPF-compatible

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-27 Thread Matt
I've been planing on trying this for about a week now, and I'm still not convinced that it will work. From my standpoint though, this represents a good way to remove a tad bit more processing and maintain a system to be shared on multiple servers without having to update text files. This idea

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-27 Thread Larry Craddock
Thanks everyone. Now that I understand how to use the test, does anyone have a spamdomains.txt file that includes the entries for the domains most commonly used that they could share? Larry Craddock

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-27 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: Larry Craddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks everyone. Now that I understand how to use the test, does anyone have a spamdomains.txt file that includes the entries for the domains most commonly used that they could share? Check the archives, Larry. I have posted

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains test not working consistently

2004-02-14 Thread Bill Landry
Scott, I am noticing SpamDomains test is not working consistently. Lots of messages are being properly flagged, but many that should be flagged but are not. I can provide samples, if you would like. Thanks for looking into this. Bill --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains test not working consistently

2004-02-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, I am noticing SpamDomains test is not working consistently. Lots of messages are being properly flagged, but many that should be flagged but are not. I can provide samples, if you would like. Yes, samples would be very helpful. Also, what version are you running?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains test not working consistently

2004-02-14 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Scott, I am noticing SpamDomains test is not working consistently. Lots of messages are being properly flagged, but many that should be flagged but are not. I can provide samples, if you would like. Yes, samples would be