Good to know. Thanks, Bill.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
FYI, from Steve Linford of spamhaus:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group
-
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
FYI, from Steve Linford of spamhaus:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/news.admin.net-abuse.email/msg/2d050ab220faf931
http://www.spamhaus.org
Does anyone have the proper setup in Declude to query
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and interpret the result?
I don't think I'm doing it correctly.
Thanks
-David
--
Best regards,
David mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
results,
SBL-XBLWARN
Note that you'll want to change 55 to the weight you want to assign on
failure.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 3:58 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
Hello Darin,
Wednesday, November 15, 2006, 4:12:49 PM, you wrote:
DC SBL ip4rsbl.spamhaus.org * 55 0
DC XBL ip4rxbl.spamhaus.org * 55 0
I was using 127.0.0.2 for SBL and 127.0.0.4 for XBL but Spamhaus lists
.2-4 for SBL and .2-6 for XBL but I guess * would work
Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darin Cox declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 5:04 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
Hello Darin,
Wednesday, November 15, 2006, 4:12:49 PM, you wrote:
DC SBL ip4rsbl.spamhaus.org * 55 0
DC XBL ip4r
This is how to do it properly. Declude will do the lookup once when
configured like this.
SPAMHAUSdnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.2
120
XBLdnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.460
BLITZEDALL dnsbl
: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
This is how to do it properly. Declude will do the lookup once when
configured like this.
SPAMHAUS dnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org 127.0.0.2 120
XBLdnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org 127.0.0.460
BLITZEDALL dnsbl%IP4R%.sbl
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
This is how to do it properly. Declude will do the lookup once when
configured like this.
SPAMHAUSdnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.2
120
XBLdnsbl%IP4R%.sbl
201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 05:35 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
This is how to do it properly
Then what was wrong with my example?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
Andy,
What you posted will work exactly the same way and there is no advantage either
]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
This is how to do it properly. Declude will do the lookup once when
configured like this.
SPAMHAUSdnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.2
120
XBLdnsbl
@declude.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:19 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
Andy,
What you posted will work exactly the same way and there is no
advantage either way except that your example is more normalized. I
use the variables for a purpose that isn't necessary
:* Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:19 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
Andy,
What you posted will work exactly the same way and there is no
advantage either way except that your example is more normalized. I
use the variables for a purpose that isn't necessary for most.
Matt
Andy
, 2006 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
nothing - Matt with his trickery is adding more weight to a last hop that fails
the test...
-Nick
Darin Cox wrote:
Then what was wrong with my example?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: declude.junkmail
: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
Darin,
You were using different addresses for the lookups. It works the same except
that two requests are sent instead of one. If you combine the SBL, CBL(XBL)
and NJABL lookups to use the same sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org domain, it will only
need to do one lookup
, overlap between XBL and NJABL.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
You are correct. I clearly missed the change where they removed BLITZEDALL
from distribution
, November 15, 2006 5:06 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
FYI... from http://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/index.lasso
Mail servers already using dnsbl.njabl.org are advised to
continue doing so, as dnsbl.njabl.org is itself
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com mailto:declude.junkmail@declude.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:44 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
nothing - Matt with his trickery is adding more weight to a last hop
that fails the test...
-Nick
Darin Cox
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
I just read that, too.
I've commented out my NJABLPROXIES ip4r test in my global.cfg
and noted that this is duplicated in my XBL test.
Andrew 8
FYI, from Steve Linford of spamhaus:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/news.admin.net-abuse.email/msg/2d050ab220faf931
http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/
Bill
David Sullivan wrote the following on 11/15/2006 12:58 PM -0800:
Does anyone have the proper setup in Declude to query
Has anyone been following the SpamHaus debacle?
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20061009/anti-spam-lawsuit.htm
-
Jay Sudowski // Handy Networks LLC
Director of Technical Operations
Providing Shared, Reseller, Semi Managed and Fully Managed Windows 2003
Hosting Solutions
Tel: 877-70 HANDY
Yes. They are making a good point. The courts shouldn't allow spammers
to file SLAPP suits as a way to threaten blacklists out of the
business. Even though Spamhaus could have fought this and won quite
easily, the fact that one has to spend resources fighting SLAPP suits is
a threat in
is this the same as the following
SBLip4rsbl.spamhaus.org
Bennie
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
It is the same as CBL, so be careful not to include both.
XBL/CBL is very
?
Thanks,
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bennie
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004
5:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Spamhaus
is this the same as the following
SBLip4rsbl.spamhaus.org
Bennie
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
It is the same as CBL, so be careful not to include both. XBL/CBL is
very accurate, primarily targets spam zombies, and should hit on about
40% of your spam.
Matt
Doug
the SBL-XBL
hit score?
Thanks,
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004
12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Spamhaus
No, that zone is only for SBL entries. There is a combined zone at sbl
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004
12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Spamhaus
Please explain. BLITZED-ALL and CBL
dont check Spamhaus, do they? Scotts spam database page
makes it look like BLITZED-ALL
ter
Sent: Wednesday,
December 01, 2004
12:32 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Spamhaus
Please
explain. BLITZED-ALL and CBL
dont check Spamhaus, do they? Scotts spam database page
makes it look like BLITZED-ALL goes to opm.blitzed.org and CBL goes to
cbl.a
Anyone use the xbl db from spamhaus? Good, bad,
otherwise?
Yes, it nails alot of spam
Rick DavidsonNational Systems ManagerNorth American Title
Group-
- Original Message -
From:
Doug Anderson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 3:11
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Spamhaus
Anyone use the xbl db
It is the same as CBL, so be careful not to include both. XBL/CBL is
very accurate, primarily targets spam zombies, and should hit on about
40% of your spam.
Matt
Doug Anderson wrote:
Anyone use the xbl db from spamhaus? Good, bad,
otherwise?
--
32 matches
Mail list logo
