RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-28 Thread John T \(Lists\)
: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Thanks for the offer but you don't have to. I'm currently testing Darrell's fpReview and it works great. Highly recommended. Jonas Fornander - System Administrator Netwood Communications,LLC - www.netwood.net Find Out Why We're Better - 310-442-1530

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread Jonas Fornander
There were some talk on the list about SpamReview earlier. Is anyone except John using it? Does it work OK? We use Imail 8.22 and really would like to find a way to work with all the messages in /spam/hold directories. Jonas Fornander - System Administrator Netwood Communications,LLC -

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Jonas, We have an application similar to SpamReview. We are currently seeking a very limited set of beta testers for called fpReview. It supports both imail and smartermail. If you or anyone else are interested please contact me offlist. If you are interested in seeing some screen

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 3:23 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview There were some talk on the list about SpamReview earlier. Is anyone except John using it? Does it work OK? We use Imail 8.22 and really would like to find a way to work with all the messages in /spam/hold directories

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread Dave Doherty
This looks really cool, Darrell. - Original Message - From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Jonas, We have an application similar to SpamReview. We

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread John Olden
Looks good. At first glance, one thing that would prevent me from switching is that I would have to go through each message individually. With SpamReview I can scan the top list showing the important info (to, from, subject, domain) to eliminate 90% of the work. Then I only have to review

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: John Olden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 5:39 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Looks good. At first glance

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Of Jonas Fornander Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 12:23 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview There were some talk on the list about SpamReview earlier. Is anyone except John using it? Does it work OK? We use Imail 8.22 and really would like to find a way

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread Jonas Fornander
) Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 4:59 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview FYI, I have not got back to you Jonas as I have been quite busy. I will see what I can do to send you the instructions by Saturday. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2006-01-13 Thread Dave Beckstrom
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer I have tested it but have never run it in a production environment. We plan to make the switch to SmarterMail once it supports whitelist auth with declude. If you would like to test it I will be more than willing to fix any bugs that you find

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Gary, Sure. Support for SmarterMail will be shortly after IMail... probably late January. Darin. - Original Message - From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:03 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Kevin, Didn't realize you had one. Is it available publicly? Darin. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:21 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer I have tested

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Steiner Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:03 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Will your replacement also work with SmarterMail? I believe the only difference between IMail and SmarterMail in this case is how they name their files

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I am going to try and get it out this week, possibly today. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:35 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
Hi All - I'm trying to find a utility that will let me analyze Declude's hold directory (well, sub-directories now) and ultimately deliver and held mail. From reviewing the archives, it looks like SpamReview and HoldAnalyzer are the two most frequently discussed programs, but I'm having issues

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Darin Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:10 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Hi All - I'm trying to find a utility that will let me analyze Declude's hold directory (well, sub-directories now) and ultimately deliver and held

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Kevin Bilbee
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 7:10 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Hi All - I'm trying to find a utility that will let me analyze Declude's hold directory (well, sub

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Gary Steiner
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Hi Jay, SpamReview is what we use currently, but we're working on a replacement with a number of new features that we're intending to release at the end of the year. I'll post to this list as soon as it's

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Kevin Bilbee
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:03 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Will your replacement also work with SmarterMail? I believe the only difference between

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

2004-04-13 Thread Markus Gufler
It is a great program... I wish I had a VB program to do the work. Same here. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the VB IDE. But if someone is interested I've some feature requests: 1.) Option to keep copy of requeued messages in a separate folder for statistical research. What test's has

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

2004-04-13 Thread Darin Cox
, 2004 4:02 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview It is a great program... I wish I had a VB program to do the work. Same here. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the VB IDE. But if someone is interested I've some feature requests: 1.) Option to keep copy of requeued messages

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

2004-04-12 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Has anyone responded to this. It is a great program... I wish I had a VB program to do the work. Fred - Original Message - From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 9:45 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Scott, We have switched

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

2004-04-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
We have switched email systems and will no longer be supporting SpamReview. It is written in VB6.0. You have any suggestions of someone that we can turn it over to? All right, hand it over. I'm in too deep to get out now. :) --Sandy Sanford

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

2004-04-12 Thread Darin Cox
We did. Waiting to see what Tom decides... Darin. - Original Message - From: Frederick Samarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 11:50 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Has anyone responded to this. It is a great program... I wish I

[Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

2004-04-10 Thread Tom Schwarz
Scott, We have switched email systems and will no longer be supporting SpamReview. It is written in VB6.0. You have any suggestions of someone that we can turn it over to? Have a Great Day, Tom -- Where Online Shopping Is Fun

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Black-listing White-listing Possible Feature

2002-12-27 Thread Roger Heath
Ok, I am now both black-listing and white-listing using a single filter file in Declude. For example if a source is blacklisted this can take the form of the following methods or commands examples: MAILFROM 60 ENDSWITH greatdeal.net HEADERS 60 CONTAINS somebaby.com BODY 60 CONTAINS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Web App Released

2002-11-27 Thread Charles Frolick
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Web App Released I have posted a copy of my SpamReview web app for download. It is sourceware, modify to your needs. I will provide as much support

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All

2002-09-25 Thread Tom Schwarz
. Will this take care of your request or would the buttons be better? Tom -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Heath Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:19 PM To: Tom Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All Importance: Low

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All

2002-09-25 Thread Roger Heath
Reply to: Tom Schwarz Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All on Wednesday 5:57:17 AM I would like the buttons actually... I am using the keyboard commands but I'd like to make these one clicks.. Particularly the delete all and exit..then this would delete all displayed

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All

2002-09-25 Thread Darrell L.
, September 24, 2002 10:19 PM To: Tom Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All Ok, SpamReview mailFrom is working great for me with the proper string detect...!!! Now for another request. two more buttons: Delete All - Deletes all entries. Delete All and Exit - Deletes all entries

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All

2002-09-25 Thread Roger Heath
Reply to: Darrell L. Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All on Wednesday 7:42:30 AM I know... This is what I do now. One click would still be nicer and faster... been using Windows since version 1. g Thanks, -- Roger Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rleeheath.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All

2002-09-25 Thread John Shacklett
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2002 6:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All Roger, Using standard windows select capibilities you may select multiple entries with the Shift and Ctrl keys

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All

2002-09-25 Thread John Shacklett
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2002 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All John, I will look into this problem again. I review and don't delete anything

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All

2002-09-24 Thread Roger Heath
Ok, SpamReview mailFrom is working great for me with the proper string detect...!!! Now for another request. two more buttons: Delete All - Deletes all entries. Delete All and Exit - Deletes all entries then exits (deleting deleted if switch is 'on') This is really want is needed.

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update and From EMail Discussion

2002-09-18 Thread Tom Schwarz
To SpamReview Users, v1.0.47 is now available. If you are already using v1.0.45 just click on File/Check for Program Updates to download the new version. Changes in this version. SpamReview now extracts the From email address for the list from the Q file if you have theShow Subject in List

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update and From EMail Discussion

2002-09-18 Thread Rick Davidson
, September 18, 2002 4:00 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update and From EMail Discussion To SpamReview Users, v1.0.47 is now available. If you are already using v1.0.45 just click on File/Check for Program Updates to download the new version. Changes in this version. SpamReview

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update and From EMail Discussion

2002-09-18 Thread Roger Heath
Reply to: Tom Schwarz Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update and From EMail Discussion on Wednesday 3:00:02 PM This feature to add to kill still fails here. In place of X-Declude-Sender: I put X-Note-Real-Mail-From: Wondering what I might be doing wrong? -- Roger Heath [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Software Request

2002-07-30 Thread Tom Schwarz
I have been looking back through my email trying to catch up and have noticed a few messages related to spamreview. As the developer I have no problem with this software being discussed here but would prefer all problem related issues be directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not that it bothers me for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Beta Update

2002-03-22 Thread Don Brown
Tom, It drive my processor to 100% when attempting to load only 55 messages from the virus folder. W2K server, dual P3 500 Mhz, 1GB memory. Thursday, March 21, 2002, 6:51:11 PM, Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TS I just posted an update to the Beta version of SpamReview (v1.0.27). TS I

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Beta Update

2002-03-21 Thread Tom Schwarz
I just posted an update to the Beta version of SpamReview (v1.0.27). I had to remove the Spool features for now. I need more time to help keep us all out of trouble. I added an update feature that will allow you to select File/Check for Program Updates and SpamReview will be updated from our

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update v1.0.21

2002-03-20 Thread Tom Schwarz
I have added a Beta/Test version of SpamReview to my site. This is version 1.0.21. For this version make sure you scroll down to the BETA Version. It includes a lot of new features (not very well documented on the web site yet but easy to figure out). http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm

MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update v1.0.21

2002-03-20 Thread Brian Watters
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update v1.0.21 I have added a Beta/Test version of SpamReview to my site. This is version 1.0.21. For this version make

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Download v1.0.21

2002-03-20 Thread Tom Schwarz
Sorry about the download problem. Since I'm on the network it worked for me when I tested. It should be working now for you. http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm Tom --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Download v1.0.21

2002-03-20 Thread Tom Schwarz
] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Download v1.0.21 The sorting is great! Thanks for the updates! Here's a couple more suggestions: Having the subject field in the the to and from fields would be really nice so we could sort by subject. It would also be nice to know how many emails

[Declude.JunkMail] spamreview gone wild

2002-03-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, This morning I discovered 3 instances of spamreview taking up 100% of the cpu utiliztion. It happened after using spam review to look at some spam. I had to use Task manager to end the processes. No copy of spam review was visible on the desktop. NT4, sp6a. I can't tell you the version

[Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Note

2002-02-15 Thread Tom Schwarz
To all that are using spamreview... If it appears that spamreview is locking up it may be because it is trying to load a large message and/or a large number of messages. To resolve the problem make sure you have v1.0.12. If you don't, you can download it at

[Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Schwarz
Several New features and fixes. If you have previously installed all you need is the exe. http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm (We are getting rain and ice so if you cannot get to the site the power lines may be down.) --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Schwarz
Hold on just a minute. I forgot to do something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 Several New features

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Don Schreiner
Is Spam Review updated since last night when I downloaded?? -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 Hold

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Schwarz
] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 Is Spam Review updated since last night when I downloaded?? -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

[Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.5

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Schwarz
Sorry!! Thats what I get trying to remove a couple of untested features before I distribute. Several New features and fixes. If you have previously installed all you need is spamreview.exe. http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm (We are getting rain and ice so if you cannot get to the site the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, This little program has saved me so much time over the past few days...what used to take an hours now takes minutes...reviewed all the spam being held in about 3 minutes this morning... This worth paying for. Thanks, Andy Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thumpernet.com 315-282-0020

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a great day, Tom TS -Original Message- TS From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of andyb@thumpernet TS Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:14 AM TS To: Tom Schwarz TS Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 TS Hi, TS This little program has

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have a great day, Tom TS -Original Message- TS From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of andyb@thumpernet TS Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:14 AM TS To: Tom Schwarz TS Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 TS Hi, TS This little program has

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Schwarz
, 2002 10:00 AM To: Tom Schwarz Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 Hi, Spamreview is now correctly displaying the message body in the Message Body window. What do I need to do the the declude config to have the correct info display in the Junk Mail Warnings: window

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of andyb@thumpernet TS Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:00 AM TS To: Tom Schwarz TS Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 TS Hi, TS Spamreview is now correctly displaying the message body in the Message TS Body window. TS What do I need to do the the declude config to have

RE: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Schwarz
]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 Hi, I think this is because there needs to be warnings in the declude config files ?? Which I don't believe I have. I'm using 1.05. I've never had anything display in that window. Thanks, Andy Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thumpernet.com 315-282

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Champaign Park District
7:58 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 Several New features and fixes. If you have previously installed all you need is the exe. http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm (We are getting rain and ice so if you cannot get to the site the power lines may be down

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Schwarz
District Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 I was muddling through the MyParty e-mails this morning that were caught by Declude and I though your program might possible used for this (with a little tweaking

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Champaign Park District
MyParty? [EMAIL PROTECTED] John --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],

[Declude.JunkMail] spamreview headers

2002-01-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Apparently spamreview likes it better when warnings are added to the header using XINHEADER (I assume). Without the warnings, all of the content of the email is being displayed in the Message Header window. syntax on using that feature more fully is appreciated. I'm guessing it may be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamreview headers

2002-01-28 Thread Tom Schwarz
Mail Warnings box. Check with Declude on how to put the warnings in the header. Tom -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of andyb@thumpernet Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:22 PM To: R. Scott Perry Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] spamreview