Do most people use WHITELIST HABEAS? I'm thinking of turning this off since
the large majority of spammers have already demonstrated their willingness
to ignore the legality of their activities.
Larry Craddock
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
Do most people use WHITELIST HABEAS? I'm thinking of turning this off since
the large majority of spammers have already demonstrated their willingness
to ignore the legality of their activities.
That's kind of like asking if you should move your store to another town,
since the store next to
But Scott, do you leave your front door unlocked if there is a bugler
actively on the lose?
Could you move this from whitelisting to weighting in order to help
protect from such things for non-Pro users? That might make a lot of
sense. This is just some header code, and that's all it takes.
It's unsafe to whitelist in general unless you have control over what is
sending, or a good relationship with the sender. Habeas is totally not
that. This should be a weighted test instead of something that gets
whitelisted. Maybe Scott could move this to the same type functionality
used in
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 9:12 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST HABEAS
Do most people use WHITELIST HABEAS? I'm thinking of turning this off
since
the large majority of spammers have already demonstrated their willingness
to ignore the legality of their activities
with by their service provider, or, failing any
satisfactory remedial action, listing in our Habeas Infringers List.]
Larry
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST HABEAS
Could you move this from whitelisting to weighting in order to help
protect from such things for non-Pro users? That might make a lot of
sense. This is just some header code, and that's all it takes.
You can use:
HABEAS habeas x x -5 0
in the global.cfg file to accomplish
on 1/12/04 9:59 AM, Larry Craddock wrote:
Good point and I do agree with one minor counter point ... we have little to
no feedback about how *the police are handling the situation.
Plus how many spam messages will be whitelisted while the police
investigate the incident and the courts go
Scott,
Whatever happened to the feature where Declude spits out a million dollars?
Eagerly waiting, but getting frustrated.
Matt :)
R. Scott Perry wrote:
Could you move this from whitelisting to weighting in order to help
protect from such things for non-Pro users? That might make a lot
: Monday, January 12, 2004 7:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST HABEAS
Could you move this from whitelisting to weighting in order to help
protect from such things for non-Pro users? That might make a lot of
sense. This is just some header code, and that's all
We're getting a LOT of spam with HABEAS headers, presumably because the
spammers are using hijacked systems. We have had to turn off that feature.
As long as systems can be hijacked, Habeas and SPF won't be worth very much.
Do most people use WHITELIST HABEAS? I'm thinking of turning
this
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST HABEAS
We're getting a LOT of spam with HABEAS headers, presumably because the
spammers are using hijacked systems. We have had to turn off
that feature.
As long as systems can be hijacked, Habeas and SPF won't be worth
very much
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST HABEAS
We have also turned off the HABEAS whitelist due to large amounts of spam.
We are also added pharma court.biz to our
I also found some today, held by Virus. Dunno if there have been others
that did get through.
Glenn Z.
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 5:42 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST HABEAS
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
