Has anyone had better luck with habeas lately. I turned things off since the
spammers jumped on.
Jeff Kratka
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 110 Ecklund St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel/fax: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kratka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] habeas
Has anyone had better luck with habeas lately. I turned things off since the
spammers jumped on.
Jeff Kratka
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Kratka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone had better luck with habeas lately. I turned things off since
the
spammers jumped on.
Don't use the Declude JunkMail habeas whitelist feature:
WHITELIST HABEAS
nor
HABEAS habeas x x -3 0
the watermark
their online agreement
to use the list that would benefit their customers.
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Kratka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 3:10 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] habeas
Has anyone had better luck with habeas lately. I turned things
- Original Message -
From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Habeas by itself was useless. A trivial amount of spammers using it.
I turned Habeas-HIL off... Too few responses to be useful. Twice in the
last
year they were false positiving on AOL, so when I was using it, their
weight
Just noticed this in the news and didn't see it on this list.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/07/habeas_spam_lawsuit/
Glad they are doing something about it.
Nathan Fouarge
AmberWave Communications
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
Just noticed this in the news and didn't see it on this list.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/07/habeas_spam_lawsuit/
Glad they are doing something about it.
Meanwhile Habeas is implementing technical modifications that will render
future Habeas Warrant Mark spoofing attacks ineffective.
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Fouarge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:05 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas win judgment
Just noticed this in the news and didn't see it on this list.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/07/habeas_spam_lawsuit
Great info! Thanks Bill.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas win judgment
Based on the following link, Habeas
Andrew...
What porn filter are you using?
Bennie
- Original Message -
From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 4:41 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn
Today's related counts:
My own Habeas filter: 17
HIL: 258
Has anybody seen the crazy amount of porn spam being sent with the Habeas
headers?
---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan
---
[This E-mail was scanned
Yes. Quite overwhelming actually.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn
Has anybody seen the crazy amount of porn spam being
on
Habeas and BondedSender entirely.
So... no, I have not SEEN this. But it may show up in my logs of messages
held.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Dan Geiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn
]
*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn
Has anybody seen the crazy amount of porn spam being sent
Yes.
At 03:45 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
Has anybody seen the crazy amount of porn spam being sent with the Habeas
headers?
---
Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn
Most people have stopped giving Habeas much negative weight, based on the
massive abuse of their mark by a spam gang hosting their pharmacy websites
in China. Habeas was very slow to populate their HIL database of known
abusers to counteract
]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn
H. Maybe I shouldn't have HABEAS whitelisted then. Also, it's still
whitelisted in the Declude JunkMail default GLOBAL.CFG.
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
)
-Original Message-
From: Dan Geiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn
Has anybody seen the crazy amount of porn spam being sent with the Habeas
headers
At 04:41 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
Today's related counts:
My own Habeas filter: 17
HIL: 258
Number of my Habeas filters tripped that were in HIL: 1
Number of my Habeas filters tripped on my porn filter: 9
You know - it's probably crossed a mind or two - but it needs to be said.
Is it now time to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn
At 04:41 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
Today's related counts:
My own Habeas filter: 17
HIL: 258
Number of my Habeas filters tripped that were in HIL: 1
Number of my Habeas
- Original Message -
From: "Madscientist" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn
At 04:41 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
Today's related counts:
My own Habeas filter: 1
Title: Message
Hello,
Is there way to
block this kind of emails? I am using lite version of
declude..
Cheers,
John
Received: from cmr-81-9-168-170.telecable.es
[81.9.168.170] by Jctweb.com (SMTPD32-6.06) id AF0537AE00B2; Thu, 22
Jan 2004 10:49:09 -0600Received: from 228.223.118.96 by
Is there way to block this kind of emails? I am using lite version of
declude..
What you want to do here is not whitelist the spam. To do that, you can
temporarily remove the WHITELIST HABEAS line in the
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg file until Habeas sues the spammers. :)
By removing the
Hi,
May be I'm must lucky - but yesterday I had:
HABEAS..50.04%
HIL...1961.57%
5 messages with HABEAS headers - but 195 mails that failed HABEAS' infringer
list.
Best Regards
Andy
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Dodell
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 01:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas
How do you implement the Habeas test?
hil.habeas.com
What type of weight are people assigning to it?
David
I counter-balance Habeas with their own hil blacklist.
Right now - 95% of all habeas mail is actually coming from a blacklisted
server.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
How do you implement the Habeas test?
hil.habeas.com
What type of weight are people assigning to it?
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
I thought Scott had it configured that if the Habeas headers were found, it
was considered a fail and therefore the negative weight should be the
first weight parameter, not the second.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I thought Scott had it configured that if the Habeas headers were found, it
was considered a fail ...
Correct.
... and therefore the negative weight should be the
first weight parameter, not the second.
Correct. So:
HABEAS habeas x x -10 0
would probably be the best way to set it up.
I decided to test the Habeas Infringers ip4r test to see if it was working,
and in 10 minutes the test has flagged 8 messages. Here is the entry I am
using:
HABEAS-INFRIGERip4rhil.habeas.com*50
It looks like a good way to offset the weight reduction Habeas test by
making the
Okay, so it was 16 minutes and I spelled INFRINGER wrong. So what... ;-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:18 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Infringers ip4r test
I decided to test the Habeas
:))
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas
Several spam emails are being whitelisted by declude, I didnt know what was
causing it as I dont have any whitelisting going on, until I noticed the
habeas header.
Am I correct in thinking that this spam messages got whitelisted because of
Habeas? And if so, what next step should I take other
Title: Message
Anybody using it to send mail? Anybody seeing mail with Habeas
headers?
I'm
considering subscribing for our outgoing e-mail newsletter, but before I do,
want to know if it works.
Thanks,
Rob
Anybody using it to send mail? Anybody seeing mail with Habeas headers?
I'm not using it, but have seen a handful of E-mails using it (typically
from the computer geek types, not the average end user).
I'm considering subscribing for our outgoing e-mail newsletter, but before
I do, want to
:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas
Anybody using it to send mail? Anybody seeing mail with Habeas
headers?
I'm not using it, but have seen a handful of E-mails using it (typically
from the computer geek types, not the average end user).
I'm considering
: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas
Sorry, didn't make myself clear.
Whitelisting Habeas works from a programmatic viewpoint - I use it here.
But I've never noticed any mail bearing Habeas Headers, so I'm wondering
if it works from a marketing
If anyone is using the Habeas headers whitelist option you should be aware
that topica.com is sending their messages with habeas headers. We have them
blacklisted but since the whitelisting overrides everything, their messages
were getting through.
Greg
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helpdesk
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 6:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas headers
If anyone is using the Habeas headers whitelist option you should be aware
Several porn spammers are also using them. They claim that they are using
verified opt-in lists, however we have seen several reports from customers
that claim they never opted-in for any adult oriented material, however may
have for other things. They are apparently buying their opt-in lists
Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helpdesk
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas headers
If anyone is using the Habeas headers whitelist option you should
on 3/25/03 10:14 AM, John Tolmachoff wrote:
What is the originating IP address?
66.180.244.23
66.180.244.25
66.180.244.28
and I assume others.
Greg
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
Just as a curiosity, is anyone using the Habeas test and if so does it help?
Jeff
*
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel/fax: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Kratka
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Test
Just as a curiosity, is anyone using the Habeas test and if so does it help?
Jeff
Title: Message
Does the HABEAS test
as implemented in Declude JunkMail query the Habeas Infringers List?
If not, would we
have to set it up in global.cfg as an ipr4 test?
Could it be run just
for those emails with Habeas headers?
Information about
the Habeas Infringers List.
Does the HABEAS test as implemented in Declude JunkMail query the Habeas
Infringers List?
No -- HIL is a standard ip4r test, and can be added to any version of
Declude, by adding a line such as:
HIL ip4r hil.habeas.com 127.0.0.2 5 0
to your global.cfg file.
Note that there are
Title: Message
Hi;
The concept is
interesting. It is sort of like the Trusted Sender of
TRUESTe.
In reviewing the
site: http://www.habeas.com/support/install.htm#headers
it seems like they
don't have IMail discussed. Scott since you started this topic, do you
knowwhat it would take to
The concept is interesting. It is sort of like the Trusted Sender of TRUESTe.
In reviewing the site:
http://www.habeas.com/support/install.htm#headershttp://www.habeas.com/support/install.htm#headers
it seems like they don't have IMail discussed. Scott since you started
this topic, do you
48 matches
Mail list logo
