RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Has a 3. version been released with the same fixes as 4.2 build 20

2006-07-11 Thread David Barker
No version 3 is still 3.10 are you experiencing any of the same problems exhibited by 4 ? David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark ReimerSent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:01 PMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Has

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Has a 3. version been released with the same fixes as 4.2 build 20

2006-07-11 Thread Mark Reimer
So 3.10 does not have a buffer overflow in BANEXT for EVA? Mark Reimer IT Project Manager American CareSource 214-596-2464 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:07 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Has a 3. version been released with the same fixes as 4.2 build 20

2006-07-11 Thread Scott Fisher
Will there be any more 3.x releases? - Original Message - From: David Barker To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:07 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Has a 3. version been released with the same fixes as 4.2 build 20 No

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Has a 3. version been released with the same fixes as 4.2 build 20

2006-07-11 Thread David Barker
Yes there will be further 3.x fixes for a period of time. However we have encouraged customers to move to 4.x as that is where future development will be focused. David From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott FisherSent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:36 PMTo:

RE: SPAM-WARN: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Has a 3. version been released with the same fixes as 4.2 build 20

2006-07-11 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
Also, doesn't 3.1 have a problem with writing headers under specific conditions (possibly identified in 4.2 as headers sometimes not written with copyfile)? See Declude ticket [30A-0C30A9AC-1BB6]. Michael ThomasMathbox978-683-67181-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]