IMO you should never let a single test hold a messages.
The question is: what is a single test? Or Is invURIBL a single test?
invURIBL does multiple checks insinde and so it's practicaly a set of
URIBL-based tests that could add some points to the weighting system.
I would consider, to not block
There is a lot of flexiblity in the invuribl scoring.
I consider the surbl.org to be a consolidation of separate uribl lists and
use the bitmask scoring option.
So if somebody is listed on more than one list, they'll get higher weights.
I can also score lists such as ws.surbl.org lower because
I hold on just INV-URIBL, but that's just me and I'm no where near as on
top of this stuff as most people that post here. That said, I've never
found a false positive from INV-URIBL.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Beckstrom
Sent:
INV-URIBL looks at links in all mail that it processes. Not just mail
identified as spam. Analyzing links is how it determines the probability of the
message being spam.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dave Beckstrom
