RE: [Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail - Base64 and Exchange Messages

2004-11-01 Thread Markus Gufler
We have set Base64 to HOLD re: the Declude docs mentioning that there is no advantage for legit messages to be sent using BASE64 encoding in text or HTML sections. I recommend: 1.) Never use a single test for a final action without a very good reason. 2.) Lower the weight of BASE64 down to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail - Base64 and Exchange Messages

2004-11-01 Thread Kathy Leonard
Thanks Marcus. I have now set the BASE64 test to WARN instead of HOLD. Is that what you meant by minimum Kathy L. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail - Base64 and Exchange Messages

2004-11-01 Thread Mark E. Smith
This is a know Outlook 2000 OWA issue. There are some counter weights that you can put into place -- seach the mail-archive on this. You're correct that no few legit messages should be sent this way but there are some exceptions. For example, Dell.com sends its quotes this way. Why are you

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail - Base64 and Exchange Messages

2004-11-01 Thread Markus Gufler
I have now set the BASE64 test to WARN instead of HOLD. Is that what you meant by minimum Not exactly. As I can understand you're using single Declude Junkmail tests to do certain concrete actions. In my optionion it's the best way to use all single tests with the assigned weight to