RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option

2003-09-30 Thread Keith Anderson
You shouldn't waste your time when third party programmers can do this stuff. We'll have a syslog version of the log renamer by tomorrow morning. Not at this time, mainly because of the amount of work that would need to go into creating the option and testing it. At this point, new

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option

2003-09-30 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option Kevin Bilbee wrote: Ultraedit has a setting to detect cnages in the file and ask if you want to reload. I can not remember if there is a manual reload menu

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option

2003-09-29 Thread Bill Landry
] Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 10:41 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option I would like the ability to log by hour also. I have a very high traffic server. I have days where my log files are over 500mb with LOGLEVEL LOW. It makes it hard to open them up and find anything

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option

2003-09-29 Thread Sheldon Koehler
7:41 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option So I will ask you the same question, why do you need to open the file for viewing? Why not just parse what you are looking for from the command prompt? There must be something I'm not considering Some of smaller guys are not versed

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option

2003-09-29 Thread Kevin Bilbee
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of DLAnalyzer Support Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option Scott, Does UltraEdit has a feature that allows you to refresh the text file? For example if something changes

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option

2003-09-28 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Scott, any more thought of adding the option to logging to a syslog? Not at this time, mainly because of the amount of work that would need to go into creating the option and testing it. At this point, new methods of detecting spam will take priority. OK, I understand that. How about the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option

2003-09-28 Thread Bill Landry
:43 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option Scott, any more thought of adding the option to logging to a syslog? Not at this time, mainly because of the amount of work that would need to go into creating the option and testing it. At this point, new methods of detecting spam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option

2003-09-28 Thread Daniel Grotjan
I would like the ability to log by hour also. I have a very high traffic server. I have days where my log files are over 500mb with LOGLEVEL LOW. It makes it hard to open them up and find anything if there is a problem. Daniel OK, I understand that. How about the ability to log by hour?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log to syslog option

2003-09-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, any more thought of adding the option to logging to a syslog? Not at this time, mainly because of the amount of work that would need to go into creating the option and testing it. At this point, new methods of detecting spam will take priority.