Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Reverse DNS pointer?

2008-04-23 Thread Chris
1. Dunno cause I have never operated a mail server without proper reverse DNS (nor any server for that matter). 2. Yes I do. Proper standard should include proper reverse. As a general rule mail servers without reverse I have encountered are sending spam OR improperly configured and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No Reverse DNS pointer?

2008-04-22 Thread John Dobbin
1. Yes - per AOL SMTP header. 2. Yes. But if it the sending host has any pointer (match or not) then pass. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 9:23 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Reverse DNS pointer?

2008-04-22 Thread Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
1) If a mail server is configured without a reverse DNS pointer, is enough to prevent email from reaching AOL, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc? AOL indicates they will do this, on occasion I have seen this, but not all the time. 2) Do you block email coming from mail servers with no reverse DNS? No,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Reverse DNS and 554 Denied

2005-03-22 Thread Don Schreiner
server ending .197 and our office IP I saw being insrted in the headers. -Don - Original Message - From: Dave Doherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:43 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Reverse DNS and 554 Denied Hi, Don

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Reverse DNS and 554 Denied

2005-03-21 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi, Don- news.holisticmoms.org reports its IP address as 65.57.241.196 65.57.241.196 reports its name as vacant.compbiz.net. You should have your provider set up a reverse lookup (pointer) record for 65.57.241.196 that points to news.holisticmoms.org instead of vacant.compbiz.net -d -

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Reverse DNS Timeouts Over Weekend

2004-07-26 Thread Markus Gufler
Dan, I can't see neither an increased number of spam in our review range nor any significant changes in the ip4r-responses. (see attached file) Markus attachment: compare_ip4r.gif

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Personal Reverse DNS Whitlisting

2003-11-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
I was wondering if it was possible to use the REVDNS on a per user basis. Unfortunately, this is not possible -- whitelisting based on the reverse DNS entry is currently only available as a global option. We have a client who wishes to recieve coolsavings.com newsletter while most others

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] a Reverse DNS entry, questions

2003-06-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
I asked my ISP to provide reverse DNS entries for my block of IP's and they replied: If you want us to create the DNS records, you need to tell us which IP points to which fully-qualified hostnames. These hostnames need to match actual forward DNS record too. Are they right do I need FQDNs for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread David Lewis-Waller
Jim, Create a reverse zone in DNS that covers the IP address used in IMail. i.e. we have xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.in-addr.arpa With entries that cover from xxx-xxx-xxx-0.domain to xxx-xxx-xxx-255.domain This ensures that we have a reverse DNS for all possible IPs on that class C. David

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread John Tolmachoff
Jim, only one PTR record per IP address needed. Should only be for the mail record domain. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread Jim Rooth
: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns Jim, only one PTR record per IP address needed. Should only be for the mail record domain. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread Mark Smith
This shouldn't fail REVDNS as there is a REVDNS entry. Maybe HELOBOGUS. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Rooth Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread David Lewis-Waller
] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns Jim, only one PTR record per IP address needed. Should only be for the mail record domain. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread Jim Rooth
: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns This shouldn't fail REVDNS as there is a REVDNS entry. Maybe HELOBOGUS. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Rooth Sent

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread David Lewis-Waller
Of Jim Rooth Sent: 09 January 2003 18:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns Problem is there are 57 domains using one ip address. Reverse lookup shows the domain the server is and not the other domains. But if you do a reverse lookup

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread John Tolmachoff
There is no need to have a PTR for mail.standardhardware.com as that is not an actual MX record. Yes, it is there, but it is not proper as mail.standardhardware.com is a cname. Not good. http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=168.75.225.197 Answer: No PTR records exist for 168.75.225.197. [Neg

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread David Lewis-Waller
]] On Behalf Of Jim Rooth Sent: 09 January 2003 18:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns Possibly...the error my client received just said no reverse dns but it does have one even if it doesn't match the wording. Thanks. Jim Rooth Klotron, Inc. 214.244.0979 [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread John Tolmachoff
John, Let's get the names straight now... :)) John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
Possibly...the error my client received just said no reverse dns but it does have one even if it doesn't match the wording. Thanks. Just to clarify, the REVDNS test in Declude JunkMail only checks for the presence of a reverse DNS entry, and doesn't care what the actual entry is. There are

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread Jim Rooth
Of David Lewis-Waller Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns John, dnstsuff shows that 168.75.225.197 (ip for mail.standardhardware.com) doesn't have a PTR record. Set one up and you shouldn't fail REVDNS. http://www.dnsstuff.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread John Tolmachoff
Thanks to all. I have sent a request to the ISP to set up PTR record and hopefully that will solve this issue. Appreciate the help from everyone. Now, if we were still driving... John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread Jim Rooth
: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns Thanks to all. I have sent a request to the ISP to set up PTR record and hopefully that will solve this issue. Appreciate the help from everyone. Now, if we were still driving... John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns

2003-01-09 Thread John Tolmachoff
This sucker would be flying down the boulevard! :)) John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Reverse DNS

2002-02-08 Thread Bennie
] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:15 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Reverse DNS I got this from a customer on my service, using my mail server... We have reverse DNS... Why did we get this message? Most likely because you don't really have reverse DNS. A lot of people set up

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Reverse DNS

2002-02-08 Thread Webmaster Oilfield Directory
: [Declude.JunkMail] No Reverse DNS I got this from a customer on my service, using my mail server... We have reverse DNS... Why did we get this message? Most likely because you don't really have reverse DNS. A lot of people set up a reverse DNS entry in their DNS servers, and assume