Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-18 Thread Matt
Karl, We were specifically talking about SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) compliance, which have no legal applicability to your own needs. Your needs are governed by Florida's Government-in-the-Sunshine laws which allow for public inspection of most records. Matt IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-18 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 12:48 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage Karl, We were specifically talking about SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) compliance, which have no legal

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-18 Thread Matt
elp them avoid a lawsuit later. Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 12:48 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: "Message" Storage Karl,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-18 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage Karl, The problem is assuming that keeping it 'legal' involves lawyers for instance. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted by Congress and the responsibility for clarifying the law into workable practices

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-18 Thread Matt
-Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Matt *Sent:* Monday, December 18, 2006 2:36 PM *To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com *Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage Karl, The problem is assuming that keeping it 'legal' involves lawyers

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-15 Thread Matt
Ok, I'll add another few cents due to popular demand. I do wish however for this to not become a thread with personal attacks or charges, which I why I tend to step away from such discussions. I had a client who is a publically traded bank complete their annual FFIEC audit today. Two of my

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-14 Thread Craig Edmonds
I know you said that catch all does not work but something I do for certain clients is make two email accounts. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then I make a rule in Imail that sends a copy of all incoming to the incoming address and then a copy of the outgoing mail to the outgoing email

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-14 Thread John T \(Lists\)
The Imail CopyAll account will work, along with Imail Rules on that account. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-14 Thread William Stillwell
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Edmonds Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 2:18 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage Importance: High I know you said that catch all does not work but something I do for certain

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-14 Thread Matt
Brand it with a fancy name and they should be happy. IMail stores messages in an open format, and as long as you catch all of it, and archive it as required, that should be all that counts. Naturally I'm simplifying, but in reality, all of these other products are programmed by people too.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-14 Thread Matt
Sanford Whiteman wrote: Unlike... um, anyone on this list, it seems... I know firsthand what SEC and NASD think of homegrown compliance solutions. That's why you pay someone else to do it and insist that they slap on a fancy name like Perfect Super Uber E-mail Compliance Archive System. But