RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-28 Thread John T \(Lists\)
] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 4:59 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview FYI, I have not got back to you Jonas as I have been quite busy. I will see what I can do to send you the instructions by Saturday. John T

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Jonas, We have an application similar to SpamReview. We are currently seeking a very limited set of beta testers for called fpReview. It supports both imail and smartermail. If you or anyone else are interested please contact me offlist. If you are interested in seeing some screen

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread Darin Cox
We still use it, but are developing a replacement. It has trouble parsing the headers for info at times, but otherwise does what it was intended to do. It will work fine with 8.22. Darin. - Original Message - From: Jonas Fornander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread Dave Doherty
This looks really cool, Darrell. - Original Message - From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Jonas, We have an application similar to SpamReview. We

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread John Olden
Looks good. At first glance, one thing that would prevent me from switching is that I would have to go through each message individually. With SpamReview I can scan the top list showing the important info (to, from, subject, domain) to eliminate 90% of the work. Then I only have to review

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: John Olden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 5:39 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Looks good. At first glance

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread John T \(Lists\)
FYI, I have not got back to you Jonas as I have been quite busy. I will see what I can do to send you the instructions by Saturday. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

2006-04-27 Thread Jonas Fornander
) Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 4:59 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview FYI, I have not got back to you Jonas as I have been quite busy. I will see what I can do to send you the instructions by Saturday. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2006-01-13 Thread Dave Beckstrom
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer I have tested it but have never run it in a production environment. We plan to make the switch to SmarterMail once it supports whitelist auth with declude. If you would like to test it I will be more than willing to fix any bugs that you find

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Gary, Sure. Support for SmarterMail will be shortly after IMail... probably late January. Darin. - Original Message - From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:03 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Kevin, Didn't realize you had one. Is it available publicly? Darin. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:21 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer I have tested

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Steiner Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:03 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Will your replacement also work with SmarterMail? I believe the only difference between IMail and SmarterMail in this case is how they name their files

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-06 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I am going to try and get it out this week, possibly today. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:35 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Jay, SpamReview is what we use currently, but we're working on a replacement with a number of new features that we're intending to release at the end of the year. I'll post to this list as soon as it's available. Darin. - Original Message - From: Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I wrote the hold analyzer but it does not function with declude hold messages being in different sub directories it only searches one directory. The DLA.msi is a package installer for the web portion for the recovery of messages. I know it looks like a reporting tool. Due to the confusion I have

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Gary Steiner
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Hi Jay, SpamReview is what we use currently, but we're working on a replacement with a number of new features that we're intending to release at the end of the year. I'll post to this list as soon as it's

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer

2005-12-05 Thread Kevin Bilbee
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:03 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview / HoldAnalyzer Will your replacement also work with SmarterMail? I believe the only difference between

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

2004-04-13 Thread Markus Gufler
It is a great program... I wish I had a VB program to do the work. Same here. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the VB IDE. But if someone is interested I've some feature requests: 1.) Option to keep copy of requeued messages in a separate folder for statistical research. What test's has

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

2004-04-13 Thread Darin Cox
, 2004 4:02 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview It is a great program... I wish I had a VB program to do the work. Same here. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the VB IDE. But if someone is interested I've some feature requests: 1.) Option to keep copy of requeued messages

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

2004-04-12 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Has anyone responded to this. It is a great program... I wish I had a VB program to do the work. Fred - Original Message - From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 9:45 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Scott, We have switched

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

2004-04-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
We have switched email systems and will no longer be supporting SpamReview. It is written in VB6.0. You have any suggestions of someone that we can turn it over to? All right, hand it over. I'm in too deep to get out now. :) --Sandy Sanford

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

2004-04-12 Thread Darin Cox
We did. Waiting to see what Tom decides... Darin. - Original Message - From: Frederick Samarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 11:50 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Has anyone responded to this. It is a great program... I wish I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Web App Released

2002-11-27 Thread Charles Frolick
I caught a bug in rules file processing. It only affected the setRuleFile function for local rules, remote rules (which is how I am set up) has no known issues. The new version has been posted. Thanks, Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All

2002-09-25 Thread Tom Schwarz
Roger, Using standard windows select capibilities you may select multiple entries with the Shift and Ctrl keys or select all entries using Ctrl-A. After selecting multiple entries you can use all the normal functions such as Delete or Move just like you would use them on one selected entry.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All

2002-09-25 Thread Darrell L.
Delete All - Deletes all entries. ctrl+a del Delete All and Exit - Deletes all entries then exits (deleting deleted if switch is 'on') ctrl+a del alt+f4 Darrell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Heath Sent: Tuesday,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All

2002-09-25 Thread John Shacklett
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2002 6:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All Roger, Using standard windows select capibilities you may select multiple entries with the Shift and Ctrl keys

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All

2002-09-25 Thread John Shacklett
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2002 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All John, I will look into this problem again. I review and don't delete anything

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update and From EMail Discussion

2002-09-18 Thread Rick Davidson
Thanks for your work and effort Tom!!! We dropped some beer money in your pay pal account, enjoy. Have a great day! Rick Davidson Buckeye Internet Services www.buckeyeweb.com 440-953-1900 - - Original Message - From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update and From EMail Discussion

2002-09-18 Thread Roger Heath
Reply to: Tom Schwarz Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update and From EMail Discussion on Wednesday 3:00:02 PM This feature to add to kill still fails here. In place of X-Declude-Sender: I put X-Note-Real-Mail-From: Wondering what I might be doing wrong? -- Roger Heath [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Beta Update

2002-03-22 Thread Don Brown
Tom, It drive my processor to 100% when attempting to load only 55 messages from the virus folder. W2K server, dual P3 500 Mhz, 1GB memory. Thursday, March 21, 2002, 6:51:11 PM, Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TS I just posted an update to the Beta version of SpamReview (v1.0.27). TS I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Download v1.0.21

2002-03-20 Thread Tom Schwarz
] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Download v1.0.21 The sorting is great! Thanks for the updates! Here's a couple more suggestions: Having the subject field in the the to and from fields would be really nice so we could sort by subject. It would also be nice to know how many emails

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Schwarz
Hold on just a minute. I forgot to do something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 Several New features and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Don Schreiner
Is Spam Review updated since last night when I downloaded?? -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 Hold

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Schwarz
] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 Is Spam Review updated since last night when I downloaded?? -Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, This little program has saved me so much time over the past few days...what used to take an hours now takes minutes...reviewed all the spam being held in about 3 minutes this morning... This worth paying for. Thanks, Andy Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thumpernet.com 315-282-0020

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Champaign Park District
I was muddling through the MyParty e-mails this morning that were caught by Declude and I though your program might possible used for this (with a little tweaking). Changes I see that could be made would be that the temp store-to directory would be c:\imail\spool\virus and take out the HTML body

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Tom Schwarz
District Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 I was muddling through the MyParty e-mails this morning that were caught by Declude and I though your program might possible used for this (with a little tweaking

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4

2002-01-30 Thread Champaign Park District
MyParty? [EMAIL PROTECTED] John --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamreview headers

2002-01-28 Thread Tom Schwarz
Yes, this is true, for now. I have a fix that will be in the next release. (waiting on an email from Scott to confirm) However, I like including warnings in the header so I can see why the email was put in the Hold state. Spamview will display all warnings from the Headers and Body in the Junk